Sara Ottoboni1, Muhid Shahid1, Christopher Steven1,2, Simon Coleman1,2, Elisabeth Meehan3, Alastair Barton2, Paul Firth2, Richard Sutherland2, Chris J Price1,4. 1. EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Continuous Manufacturing and Crystallisation, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, U.K. 2. Alconbury Weston, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 3PE, U.K. 3. Pharmaceutical Technology and Development, AstraZeneca, Macclesfield SK10 2NA, U.K. 4. Department of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1RD, U.K.
Abstract
A key challenge during the transition from laboratory/small batch to continuous manufacturing is the development of a process strategy that can easily be adopted for a larger batch/continuous process. Industrial practice is to develop the isolation strategy for a new drug/process in batch using the design of experiment (DoE) approach to determine the best isolation conditions and then transfer the isolation parameters selected to a large batch equipment/continuous isolation process. This stage requires a series of extra investigations to evaluate the effect of different equipment geometry or even the adaptation of the parameters selected to a different isolation mechanism (e.g., from dead end to cross flow filtration) with a consequent increase of R&D cost and time along with an increase in material consumption. The CFD25 is an isolation device used in the first instance to develop an isolation strategy in batch (optimization mode) using a screening DoE approach and to then verify the transferability of the strategy to a semicontinuous process (production mode). A d-optimal screening DoE was used to determine the effect of varying the input slurry. Properties such as solid loading, particle size distribution, and crystallization solvent were investigated to determine their impact on the filtration and washing performance and the characteristics of the dry isolated product. A series of crystallization (ethanol, isopropanol, and 3-methylbutan-1-ol) and wash solvents (n-heptane, isopropyl acetate and n-dodcane) were used for the process. To mimic a real isolation process, paracetamol-related impurities, acetanilide and metacetamol, were dissolved in the mother liquor. The selected batch isolation strategy was used for the semicontinuous isolation run. Throughput and filtration parameters, such as cake resistance and flow rate, cake residual liquid content and composition, cake purity, particle-particle aggregation, and extent and strength of agglomerates, were measured to evaluate the consistency of the isolated product produced during a continuous experiment and compared with the isolated product properties obtained during the batch process development. Overall, the CFD25 is a versatile tool which allows both new chemical entity process development in batch and the production of the active pharmaceutical ingredient in semicontinuous mode using the same process parameters without changing equipment. The isolated product properties gained during the semicontinuous run are overall comparable between samples. The residual solvent content and composition differs between some samples due to filter plate blockage. In general, the mean properties obtained during semicontinuous running are comparable with the product properties simulated using the DoE.
A key challenge during the transition from laboratory/small batch to continuous manufacturing is the development of a process strategy that can easily be adopted for a larger batch/continuous process. Industrial practice is to develop the isolation strategy for a new drug/process in batch using the design of experiment (DoE) approach to determine the best isolation conditions and then transfer the isolation parameters selected to a large batch equipment/continuous isolation process. This stage requires a series of extra investigations to evaluate the effect of different equipment geometry or even the adaptation of the parameters selected to a different isolation mechanism (e.g., from dead end to cross flow filtration) with a consequent increase of R&D cost and time along with an increase in material consumption. The CFD25 is an isolation device used in the first instance to develop an isolation strategy in batch (optimization mode) using a screening DoE approach and to then verify the transferability of the strategy to a semicontinuous process (production mode). A d-optimal screening DoE was used to determine the effect of varying the input slurry. Properties such as solid loading, particle size distribution, and crystallization solvent were investigated to determine their impact on the filtration and washing performance and the characteristics of the dry isolated product. A series of crystallization (ethanol, isopropanol, and 3-methylbutan-1-ol) and wash solvents (n-heptane, isopropyl acetate and n-dodcane) were used for the process. To mimic a real isolation process, paracetamol-related impurities, acetanilide and metacetamol, were dissolved in the mother liquor. The selected batch isolation strategy was used for the semicontinuous isolation run. Throughput and filtration parameters, such as cake resistance and flow rate, cake residual liquid content and composition, cake purity, particle-particle aggregation, and extent and strength of agglomerates, were measured to evaluate the consistency of the isolated product produced during a continuous experiment and compared with the isolated product properties obtained during the batch process development. Overall, the CFD25 is a versatile tool which allows both new chemical entity process development in batch and the production of the active pharmaceutical ingredient in semicontinuous mode using the same process parameters without changing equipment. The isolated product properties gained during the semicontinuous run are overall comparable between samples. The residual solvent content and composition differs between some samples due to filter plate blockage. In general, the mean properties obtained during semicontinuous running are comparable with the product properties simulated using the DoE.
A key challenge facing the pharmaceutical industry is maintaining
particle properties across the entire purification and isolation process.
In the last decade, there has been substantial effort into crystal
engineering to generate particles in suspension with the required
size, habit, and other critical attributes. However, the task of maintaining
these desirable particle properties during downstream isolation has
received less attention. Active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) isolation
by filtration, washing, and drying still poses significant challenges
if practitioners are to avoid unwanted crystal attrition or agglomeration
or precipitating dissolved product or impurities.[1,2] Without
effective washing, impurities which are in solution in the filtrate,
some of which is retained in the filter cake, are incorporated in
the product during drying, reducing purity. Any residual dissolved
solute is also deposited and tends to promote granulation, changing
the product particle size distribution (PSD).[3] A washing step is invariably employed to minimize these problems.[4] The final product attributes can be affected
by different process and physicochemical parameters such as the feed
suspension viscosity and density, PSD, suspended particle loading,[5−10] the chemical character of impurities,[11] the interactions between solvents during washing and drying,[12−14] the point at which filtration is halted (dry land or breakthrough),
the pressure driving force for both filtration and washing, etc. All
of these processes and material attributes can affect the isolated
crystal attributes (PSD, aspect ratio, and purity), filtration rate,
efficiency of washing, and propensity for filter blockage.[15−19] Equipment design affects the filtration performance. Therefore,
decisions taken during the isolation stage can modify the particle
characteristics. It is crucial to design the isolation process to
maintain the required properties of the crystals obtained during crystallization.The pharmaceutical industry is starting to adopt continuous API
manufacturing in order to reduce the cost of production, improve manufacturing
flexibility, and reduce infrastructure cost. It is also anticipated
that continuous processing will improve consistency of API critical
quality attributes, to reduce manufacturing lead time (from typically
6 months to 10 days[20]) and to improve sustainability
by reducing waste generation.[21] This is
taking place, in part, as a response to initiatives promoted by the
United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) which in 2003 began
to encourage the industry to develop new, innovative processing methods
to improve product consistency.[22−24]Innovations have been reported
to transition synthesis, crystallization,
and secondary processes from batch to continuous operations. However,
both API and intermediate isolations are still almost exclusively
performed batch wise. There have been few attempts to develop equipment
to address the gap of continuous pharmaceutical isolation.[25−29] and the strategies to transition from batch to continuous API isolation
are not well investigated.In this work, strategies for the
development of an API isolation
process in batch mode using a screening DoE approach are investigated
before the knowledge gathered is used to operation in a semicontinuous
mode. A d-optimal design of experiments (DoEs) was used to investigate
this multivariate problem, containing both qualitative and quantitative
factors, in order to minimize the number of experiments required to
characterize the system. Usually in industry the isolation strategy
is developed batchwise using Nutsche filters, while continuous isolation
is conducted with other isolation systems (rotary drum, belt filter,
etc.). Changing the isolation equipment increases the challenges related
to the process conversion from batch to continuous. Therefore, scientists
need not only consider aspects like isolation chamber size variation
but also variation of the isolation mechanism. In this study, the
use of a single unit capable of the isolating material in a batch
and semicontinuous/continuous way, the CFD25 (Alconbury Weston Ltd,
AWL, UK),[30] has been used to investigate
how easily the batch isolation strategy development can be transferred
to the CFD25 semicontinuous isolation approach. An isolation strategy
was developed using the CFD25 in batch mode (called optimization mode)
and then used virtually unchanged to run the CFD25 in a semicontinuous/continuous
manner (production mode).Common practice in filter cake washing
is to use at least three
cake volumes of the wash solvent to remove mother liquor and the associated
impurities of synthesis. This typically amounts to 5 to 7 mL of solvent
per gram of API produced.[31] The goals of
this work are the following:To improve washing efficiency and consequently minimize
solvent use;To improve environmental
sustainability in API isolation
minimizing solvent consumed;To improve
product purity;To reduce manufacturing
costs.The main target of continuous
isolation is to reduce the processing
time and cost[31] whilst minimizing negative
impacts on API particle physical properties in order to deliver API
that is optimal for final processing into drug products, for example,
eliminating the need for a particle size reduction step after isolation.[32]The effect of input slurry properties
such as solid loading, PSD,
and crystallization solvent were investigated to determine their impact
on the filtration and washing performance and the characteristics
of the dry isolated product. Two different PSD grades of API were
used, a typical crystalline product, and micronized paracetamol. Paracetamol
was selected as model compound because it is a well-researched compound
and is thereby facilitating experimental work;[20,22,23] also, the majority of its related impurities
are commercially available. The role of washing was explored by analyzing
the effect of different crystallization and wash solvents and the
quantity of wash solvent used to remove paracetamol related impurities
such as acetanilide and metacetamol because of their different solubility
respect to the paracetamol in crystallization and in the wash solvent.
Acetanilide does not contain in the molecular structure the hydroxyl
group that reduce solubility in solvents, whereas metacetamol is the
meta isomer of paracetamol showing lower solubility respect to the
paracetamol. The slurries used were generated from pure materials,
where the related impurities were dissolved in the crystallization
solvent to mimic slurries produced during a crystallization process.
Product crystal suspensions were prepared using three potential crystallization
solvents: ethanol, isopropanol, and isoamyl alcohol.[33−35] Three different wash solvents were evaluated. n-Heptane and isopropyl acetate were selected based on their miscibility
with the primary crystallization solvents to facilitate diffusional
and dilution washing mechanisms and therefore facilitate impurity
removal; isopropyl acetate and n-heptane exhibit
relatively high and very low paracetamol solubility, respectively.
The third wash solvent n-dodecane was selected as
an immiscible wash solvent to exemplify displacement washing in the
absence of miscibility. In each case, the wash strategy was designed
to minimize the nucleation of new crystals during washing.Industrial
practice is to follow the International Conference of
Harmonisation (ICH) harmonised tripartite guideline Q6A (test procedure
and acceptance criteria for new substances and new drug products)
to identify the tests required to analyze drugs and drug products
to evaluate the product conformance to specifications. As described
in ICH Q6A guideline,[36] a series of tests
are required during the design and development of a new product/process,
these include the following:Identification and assay test, such as HPLC, to verify
paracetamol compound content with respect to the relative impuritiesPSD testsA
series of specific tests to verify the impact of specific
product properties on the downstream process.The analytical strategy proposed covers a series of analytical
characterizations to determine filtration properties[37] (specific test), residual solvent content and composition
after drying (specific test), purity achieved during washing of the
isolated material, PSD, and agglomeration propensity, and strength
of the isolated product (specific test) here used is following the
industrial practice and the ICH guideline specifications.Filter
cake properties were determined using the on-board machine
vision system in the CFD25 to halt filtration at drylanda and to record filtration rate data. The filter cake and filtrate
were both analyzed using HPLC to quantify the purification achieved.
The mechanical properties of the isolated product were evaluated;
the extent of agglomeration, the agglomerate PSD, and the agglomerate
mechanical strength were all measured. Proton nuclear magnetic spectroscopy
(1H NMR) was used to determine the residual solvent in
the dried filter cake.The isolation strategy developed during
the screening DoE was used
to run a semicontinuous isolation test. The samples collected were
analyzed using the same analytical procedure to determine filtration
properties, residual solvent content and composition, isolated cake
purity, extent and PSD, and strength of agglomerates.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Two
PSD grades of paracetamol
(typical crystalline and micronized) were selected to challenge different
aspects of filtration, washing, and drying. The micronized material
(Mallinckrodt, Inc., batch 042213E407: x50, 24.55 μm; SMD, 18.66 μm) settles slowly and filters
slowly, has a large wetted surface area to wash, and is more challenging
to dry than the granular grade material. The intermediate powder grade
was used to mimic a typical crystalline material (Mallinckrodt Inc.,
UK, batch 637514D001: x50, 64.03 μm;
SMD, 46.35 μm). The PSD of the two different materials are reported
in the Supporting Information section.Two structurally related compounds of paracetamol were used, acetanilide
and metacetamol; if present at the end of the synthesis, they could
affect the crystallization process.[33,34,38] HPLC was used to determine purity of the isolated
product. The eluents contained water (Water, Ultrapure, HPLC Grade,
Alfa Aesar) and methanol (Methanol, Ultrapure, HPLC Grade, 99.8+%,
Alfa Aesar); the methanol was also used as diluent for some samples.
Dimethyl sulphoxide-d (extent of deuteration 99.8%
for NMR spectroscopy, VWR, UK) was used as the NMR solvent.To investigate efficiency of the AWL’s CFD25 to isolate
a “real process slurry” a series of three crystallization
solvents were used: ethanol [purity ≥ 99.8% (GC), from Sigma-Aldrich],
propan-2-ol (IPA) [purity ≥ 99.5% (GC), from Sigma-Aldrich],
and 3-methylbutan-1-ol, (known as isoamyl alcohol) [purity ≥
99.5% (GC), from Sigma-Aldrich. As for the wash solvents, n-heptane (purity 99% from Alfa Aesar, UK), isopropyl acetate
(purity 99+ % from Alfa Aesar), and n-dodecane (purity
99%, from Alfa Aesar) were selected. The washing approach used for
each crystallization–wash solvent combination is reported in
the Results and Discussion section.
Raw Material Characterization
A series
of raw material characterization were conducted to investigate the
following:The PSD of the paracetamol
material used to generate
the slurry. The PSD of micronized and typical crystalline material
were determined by image analysis (QICPIC particle size analysis,
Sympatec, Germany, QICPIC Rodos/L; trigger conditions: feed pressure
1 bar, VIBRI feeder, feed rate 25%, gap width 1.5 mm).The solubility of paracetamol in the crystallization
and wash solvents was determined experimentally by equilibration and
gravimetric analysis using an incubator (Incubator S160D, Stuart,
Cole-Parmer, UK) on a multiposition stirrer plate. The measured values
were compared with those taken from the literature,[39,40] where available, and values were predicted using COSMOTherm (COSMOlogic GmbH & Co. KG, Germany).The true density of the paracetamol grades was determined
with the Accupyc 1330 V1.30 Helium pycnometer. Ten replicas for each
compound were run. Specific surface area BET (m2/g) using
octane as the vapor probe.The impurity
content in the filter cake and filtrate.
Calibration curves for pure paracetamol, acetanilide, metacetamol,
and orthocetamol (an impurity present in the raw paracetamol) were
gathered using a multilevel calibration method. An Agilent 1260 Infinity
II system with a diode array and RI detector was used. The column
was an Agilent Poroshell 120 EC-C18 4.6 × 100 mm × 4 μm
operated at 40 °C, with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The injection
volume was 5 μL, wavelength: 243 and 230.5 nm, the mobile phase
was 80% water and 20% methanol.The compressibility
index of the two PSD grades was
determined by filtering three different aliquots of slurry using three
different pressure driving forces: 300, 500 and 900 mbar. The natural
logarithm of the cake resistances measured during these experiments
is plotted against the natural logarithm of the driving force, and
the slope of the linear fitting is giving the cake compressibility.[3]The potential for
“antisolvent effects”
to occur during washing. A fast screening procedure to identify appropriate
crystallization–wash solvent mixture compositions was conducted.
This test is performed to minimize paracetamol dissolution, whilst
avoiding precipitation of fine paracetamol particles or impurities.
The potential for particle formation during washing from a thermodynamic
perspective can be estimated relatively rapidly from solubility data,
whereas the kinetics needs to be determined experimentally by a more
time consuming process. This screening method is rapid and simple
to operate, allowing the experimentalist to determine whether the
kinetics of particle formation due to washing are comparable with
the washing step or if the “antisolvent effect” is taking
longer time to occur. For all the combinations of crystallization
and wash solvents screening was conducted at room temperature by contacting
paracetamol saturated primary solvent, which mimiced the mother liquor,
with each wash solvent. Different ratio of the solvent pairings were
analyzed: 50–50, 40–60, 30–70, 20–80,
10–90 and 100% pure wash solvent. For the combination of isopropanol
and dodecane, 60% crystallization and 40% of wash solvent was also
tested. Compositions which resulted in product being precipitated
were rejected.
Slurry
Preparation: Test CFD25 with Structurally
Related Paracetamol Compounds
Suspensions containing dissolved
acetanilide and metacetamol the representative impurities of synthesis
were prepared as a concentration of 2% by mass of each impurity. The
required mass of each impurity was weighed and dissolved fully in
the crystallization solvent prior to adding any paracetamol. The amount
of paracetamol required to saturate the solvent solution was then
added and dissolved. The last step in suspension preparation was to
add the paracetamol required to form the cake, this paracetamol represents
the solid load, calculated in % by mass. This two-stage addition of
paracetamol was crucial to avoid partial dissolution of the cake forming
particles affecting the filter cake properties.To avoid “antisolvent
effect” leading to dissolved API being precipitated during
the first wash step the first stage wash was prepared using a mixture
of pure crystallization and wash solvents. The composition was selected
based on the wash solvent screening methodology outlined in the Raw Materials Characterization section. The second
washing step was conducted using pure wash solvent. In each instance,
the wash solvent quantity was based on the cake void volume and the
criteria set up in the experimental design.
CFD25
Continuous Filtration, Washing and Drying
System Overview
The CFD25b[41] is a dead end filtration unit able to filter,
wash and dry API cakes in manual, semiautomated or even semicontinuous
mode (Figure ). It
is an advanced prototype which was developed to allow the investigations
reported here to take place and to use the data gathered to further
enhance the operability of the final product.[42]
Figure 1
CFD25
carousel filtration and isolation unit.
CFD25
carousel filtration and isolation unit.The prototype unit is controlled through a touch-screen panel.
The unit consists of:A slurry
tank with agitator to provide a homogeneous
slurry. This vessel has two functions: (1) holding a set volume of
API for a trial, (2) buffer vessel to be placed between a continuous
crystallizer/reactor and the continuous filter dryer to allow for
planned and non-planned upstream downtime.A vacuum transfer system is used to intermittently withdraw
aliquots of slurry from the slurry vessel to the charge vessel, before
then discharging the aliquot under gravity into port 1 of the isolation
carousel. The transfer system is described in Section .The carousel consists of 10 different glass tubes of
22.4 mm diameter where filtration, multiple washing stages, deliquoring
and drying is carried out. These tubes rotate above a base with ten
apertures, nine of which contain a BOPP Poremet 20 μm filter
mesh (G. BOPP & CO.). The filter chambers are formed when the
carousel is compressed against the base plate with each glass tube
located above a filter. Position 1 of the carousel is used for slurry
feeding and filtration, position two and three can be used for multiple
washing steps position four can be used for additional washing or
deliquoring step, while positions five to nine are used for drying.
There is no filter media present in position 10 which allows the cake
to be mechanically ejected by a pneumatic cylinder (Figure ).
Figure 2
CFD25 schematic
operative procedure. From left to right: port 1
where the suspension is fed and filtered; port 2, where cake is washed
the first time; port 3, where cake is washed a second time; port 4,
where cake is deliquored; port 5, where convective drying (in optimization
mode) is done. In production mode drying is subdivided from port 5
to 9. Port 10 is used to discharge the dried cake.
Two wash solvent containers are connected to the washing
positions. To prevent disturbance of the cake surface, wash solvent
is dispensed on top of the cake using atomization nozzles.A receiver is connected to the bottom of
each carousel
position allowing the user to collect the liquid phase, remove and
analyze the impurity content in each filtrate phase, or to evaluate
filtrate removed in each filtration/wash/drying stage.Static drying is carried out under vacuum to allow the
flow of ambient or heated compressed air to flow through the cake.
The temperature of the gas is controlled by the on-board electronics
to ensure that the temperature sensitive compounds are not damaged.
To heat up the gas, a system invented by Purdue University and developed
by AWL is used.[42] The C-Core carbon heated
transfer line is composed of a woven carbon fiber tube covering a
PTFE transfer tube. A voltage is applied to the carbon fiber which
then reaches the desired temperature in seconds. This in turn heats
up the transfer tube and therefore the drying gas. This technology
ensures flexible and accurate control of the temperature of the drying
gas delivered to the drying port.CFD25 schematic
operative procedure. From left to right: port 1
where the suspension is fed and filtered; port 2, where cake is washed
the first time; port 3, where cake is washed a second time; port 4,
where cake is deliquored; port 5, where convective drying (in optimization
mode) is done. In production mode drying is subdivided from port 5
to 9. Port 10 is used to discharge the dried cake.Please note, drying times are generally longer than the process
time in a filtration or washing port. Drying in one port position
would extend the cycle time and therefore decrease overall throughput.
This decrease in throughput is overcome in AWL’s filter dryers
by sharing the drying across 5 drying port positions. This means that
the drying time can be 5 times the time of the filtration/washing
port position with the longest processing time. In terms of throughput,
the limiting factor can be related to either the processing time required
for all filtration and washing steps, or the time required for drying.
In the CFD25, the drying time per port can be specified, the system
can therefore be dried for the specified time regardless of the total
time required for filtration and washing. If extended drying times
are required to achieve specified moisture levels then overall throughput
will be effected. For a production unit which processes material requiring
a long drying period, the number of drying ports can be increased
to increase the drying time.
Slurry Transfer System
The slurry
transfer system is illustrated in Figure . The transfer line between the slurry vessel
and the charge vessel consists of the following; a PTFE lined stainless
steel 6 mm ID dip tube with a length of 300 mm, a 4 mm ID transfer
line with a length of 1 m, and a pneumatic pinch valve (V3) with 10
mm ID. The line between the charge vessel and the isolation carousel
consists of a pneumatic pinch valve (V7) with 10 mm ID and an 8 mm
ID tube with a length of 150 mm.
Figure 3
Process diagram of slurry transfer system
for transferring aliquots
of slurry from the slurry vessel to the charge vessel using a vacuum,
before discharging the aliquot under gravity into port 1 of the isolation
carousel.
Process diagram of slurry transfer system
for transferring aliquots
of slurry from the slurry vessel to the charge vessel using a vacuum,
before discharging the aliquot under gravity into port 1 of the isolation
carousel.The vacuum transfer procedure
is carried out as follows: (1) a
specified level of vacuum is created in the charge vessel, (2) the
pinch valve between the slurry vessel and charge vessel is opened
and an aliquot of slurry is drawn into the charge vessel, (3) the
pinch valve between the slurry vessel and charge vessel is then closed,
(4) the pinch valve between the charge vessel and isolation carousel
opens and the aliquot of slurry is transferred under gravity into
the first port position of the carousel, (5) the pinch valve between
the slurry vessel and charge vessel opens, allowing any residual slurry/solids
in the transfer line to fall back into the slurry vessel.To
ensure that a representative sample of slurry is drawn from
the slurry vessel, the slurry vessel agitator is rotated at a speed
which fully suspends the solids, and the end of the dip tube is placed
toward the bottom of the vessel in a well-agitated region, approximately
1 cm from the agitator. The level of slurry is kept above at least
300 mL to ensure that the solids were suspended in a reasonable volume
of slurry. Preliminary experiments used the camera to measure the
volume of the aliquot and the volume of solids in that aliquot. The
variation in the % solids was ±9% measured across 6 number of
samples.To ensure that a consistent volume of slurry is transferred
for
each aliquot, the vacuum transfer system is calibrated. The volume
of slurry carried into the charge vessel is controlled by vacuum levels
measured in the charge vessel. The vacuum level required to draw over
a small volume dose (e.g., 25 mL) and the vacuum level required to
draw over a large volume dose (e.g., 75 mL) are recorded. The system
uses these vacuum values to plot a graph of vacuum level versus volume
transferred. The system uses this plot to calculate the vacuum level
required to draw over a specified volume. The accuracy of the slurry
volume transfer is ±2 mL.The volume transferred into the
ports of the isolation carousel
are measured by the camera vision system, as shown in Figure and described in more detail
in Section .
Vision System
The CFD25 employs
a vision system to determine the relative heights of the liquid phase
and accumulated solids (Figure ). The camera measures the position of the meniscus of the
liquid and the height of the cake by detecting dark-to-light (or light-to-dark)
transitions. The camera measures pixel values which are then converted
into volumes in milliliters. Before the camera is used to measure
volumes, the camera is calibrated by placing calibration sticks of
known height and volume within the ports of the isolation carousel.
The system records the pixel values of the top of the calibration
stick and uses these values to convert pixel values into volumes for
each port position.
Figure 4
Schematic of the camera arrangement for the vision system.
(a)
The camera looks through the side of the glass tube (filtration vessel).
(b) The liquid and solid interfaces are visible to the camera.
Schematic of the camera arrangement for the vision system.
(a)
The camera looks through the side of the glass tube (filtration vessel).
(b) The liquid and solid interfaces are visible to the camera.There are two different modes: one for a slurry
with solids which
settle within a reasonable time (i.e., a “settling slurry”)
and one for a slurry with solids that do not settle in a reasonable
time and/or when the level of the cake cannot be detected by the camera.For a slurry with solids that settle within a reasonable time (a
“settling slurry”), the vision system can detect the
meniscus of the liquid and the level of the solid due to dark-to-light
transitions. This allows filtration and washing to be stopped at dry
land or allowed to continue to breakthrough by bypassing the automatic
control and stopping the filtration manually. Halting the process
at dry land when the liquid interface reaches the cake surface ensures
that the cake remains fully saturated and establishes ideal conditions
for displacement washing. To allow a partial separation of liquid
and solid phases and guarantee the ability of the vision system to
work, after slurry charging and before filtration in port 1, slurry
is maintained undisturbed for a few seconds. The liquid level is tracked
while the filtrate is being removed; this approach allows the recording
of the filtrate volume removed during the time. This consequently
allows for the calculation of filtration parameters such as filtrate
flow rate, cake and media resistance, cake permeability, cake volume,
and cake density. Cake compressibility can be measured during the
optimization mode, by filtering different aliquots of slurry at different
driving forces and comparing the cake resistance generated.For a slurry with solids which do not settle easily (a “nonsettling
slurry”) or a slurry which deposits significant quantities
of particles on the walls of the tube, a “non-settling mode”
can be selected which uses an expected cake height. An automated calibration
procedure has been developed to calibrate the expected cake height.
The calibration procedure first draws over a specified volume of slurry
into port 1 and measures the volume of slurry transferred. The slurry
in port 1 is then filtered. Once the operator sees that the cake is
deliquored, the operator can accept the measured cake height of the
deliquored cake. The system then draws over another aliquot of slurry
with a different specified volume. The slurry is filtered, the cake
is deliquored, and the cake height is accepted by the user and recorded.
The system plots the “expected cake height” versus “measured
slurry volume” based on the two points that have been recorded.
The system can therefore use this plot to calculate the expected cake
height from the measured slurry volume during optimization or production
mode. A tolerance band of a few mL can be specified so that the filtration
can be stopped before reaching the expected cake height.There
may be cases where the slurry or wash solvent splashes the
wall of the tube. This may cause the camera to briefly detect the
splashes as a light-to-dark transition, therefore incorrectly measuring
this splash as the liquid level. Improvements that have been made
to the vision software to prevent this are described in Section .There may be cases where the slurry splashes the walls of the tube.
This may cause the camera to briefly detect the splashes as a light-to-dark
transition, therefore incorrectly measuring this splash as the liquid
level. To prevent this, if the liquid level detected by the camera
momentarily jumps to another position, the software will ignore this
and continue to measure the true liquid level.Post-filtration
in port 1, a slurry is yet to be encountered which
cannot be removed from the walls with wash solvent dispensed through
the spray nozzles. This allows the camera to operate using the same
settings for ports 2–4 irrespective of slurry attributes.In cases where halting filtration before breakthrough, or where
the user doesn’t require the automatic capture of filtration
data, there are other systems available from AWL without the transparent
carousel and therefore no vision system. For systems without the vision
system, the filtration and washing control are based on pump times
and vacuum times.
Modes of Operation
Three different
operating approaches can be used: fully manual, semiautomated, called
“Optimization Mode”, and fully semicontinuous, called
“Production Mode”. Manual mode is used when the operator
requires full control of each step of isolation; this method uses
the maximum available vacuum (900 mbar) to filter the cake and as
the camera cannot be used to halt filtration at dry land, the operator
must manually stop the filtration step. In addition, the operator
may manually control wash quantity, wash solvent deliquoring, and
drying.Optimization mode is when a single cake progresses through
each of the various carousel stations with the exception of the drying
stage which is carried out solely in port 5: this mode is recommended
for process development as it can generate the maximum data from the
minimum product and it allows for the collection of filtrate and wash
solvent from each port for off-line analysis. To set filtration, washing,
and drying parameters, a setup screen is used to program the unit.
After a single cake has been processed, it is possible to wash the
filter plates with a wash-in-place (WIP) solvent. When using optimization
mode for the experiments in this paper, 25–30 mL of acetone
was drawn through each filter plate in ports 1–4, before the
next aliquot of slurry was processed.Production mode is fully
automated and can simultaneously process
a cake in each port and so isolate multiple aliquots of slurry: this
mode uses the filtration parameters obtained in optimization mode
and allows for maximum throughput. To allow semicontinuous cake processing,
drying is divided through ports five to nine.
Production
Mode in CFD25
The
production mode set for this work consisted on a series of operations:Transfer from the slurry tank to
port 1, 65 mL of slurry;
cake and filtrate volume were semicontinuously recorded by the camera;
filtration was stopped at dryland (i.e., when the liquid level reached
the top level of the cake); the head of the carousel lifted allowing
the carousel to rotate one position to index the cake from port 1
to port 2.The camera automatically calculated
the volume of wash
solvent required to wash the cake in port 2 in relation to the cake
volume and cake void fraction; the volume of wash solvent was set
in the setup mode, corresponding to 1 cake void volume. The solvent
selected as wash 1 was a mixture of ethanol–heptane (50–50%
v/v), used to prevent antisolvent effect during washing. The wash
solvent was pumped into port 2. Concurrently in port 1, another dose
of slurry was dispensed. When the slurry was fully dispensed in port
1, vacuum was applied in ports 1 and 2, and filtration (port 1) and
washing (port 2) proceeded simultaneously. Filtration and washing
both stopped at dry land by the automatic operation of individual
bottom outlet valves. Upon completion of the filtration and washing
processes, the carousel head lifted and the cakes indexed to port
3 and 2Three corresponding cake void
volumes of wash solvent
2 (n-heptane) was automatically measured and dispensed
in port 3 whilst wash solvent 1 was measured and dispensed in port
2 and 65 mL of slurry were transferred in port 1. As above, vacuum
was then applied and in each port, filtration stopped at dry land.
The carousel again indexed one position moving the cakes to ports
4, 3, and 2.In port 4, the cake saturated
with n-heptane (from wash 2) was deliquored for 20
s whilst all other process
described in the step above were repeated.Ports 5 to 9 were each used as a drying station: each
station dried the cake for 30 s; ambient temperature gas (25 °C)
was split into those 5 ports. The unit is also able to dry the wet
cake at different drying temperatures; however, for this test, drying
temperature was considered a fixed parameter.Port 10 was used to eject the cake.In cases where filtration and/or washing is protracted
due to incorrect detection of cake and liquid levels, the process
in each port was set to stop after a defined period (800 s for filtration
and 300 s for washing, with a further constraint of a maximum process
time of 999 s). When these time limits are reached, the unit proceeds
to index to the next stage, regardless of the residual solvent mass
left behind so that processing can continue.To avoid filter
blinding, a WIP process was completed every 5 indexes
in ports 1, 2, 3, and 4. Some preliminary tests showed that acetone
was a suitable WIP solvent for this process. The WIP sequence dispenses
25–30 mL of WIP solvent through each of the filter plates in
ports 1–4. The WIP sequence is as follows:Ports 2–10
continue as normal
but no slurry is dosed into port 1. Once all ports have completed
the carousel indexes one positionPorts 3–10 continue as normal.
Port 2 does nothing and is complete. Port 1 is dosed with a volume
of WIP solvent. The solvent sits on the filter plate for a specified
time to allow the fines to be dissolved before a vacuum is then applied
under the plate to draw the WIP solvent through. Once all ports have
completed, the carousel indexes one position.Ports 4–10 continue as normal.
Port 1 and 3 do nothing and are marked as complete. Port 2’s
filter plate is washed with a WIP solvent as described above. Once
all ports are complete, then the carousel indexes one position.Ports 1 and 5–10
continue as
normal (i.e., slurry is dispensed and filtered in port 1, and ports
5–10 continue as normal). Ports 2 and 4 do nothing and are
marked as complete. Port 3’s filter plate is washed as described
above. Once all ports are complete then the carousel indexes one position.The same procedure is repeated until port
positions 1–4
have been washed with WIP solvent.
Experimental
Design: CFD25 with Paracetamol
and Related Compounds
A DoE approach was used to analyze
a multifactorial problem minimizing the number of experiments to run
and to maximize the number of achievable results. MODDE was selected
as software for the DoE data analysis. The model used to analyze the
data is a screening d-optimal process model where seven factors and
seven responses were selected. A total of 21 experiments were run.
The d-optimal approach is appropriate in this case because the experimental
variables investigated comprise of a combination of quantitative and
qualitative factors.[55,56] The seven factors selected were
a combination of three qualitative and four quantitative factors.
Factors, factor ranges, and responses are reported in Table . Three center points were used
for the design space, and no constraints or inclusions were set. Three
factors were selected for the design space: API solid load, isolation
pressure (driving force), and volume of wash solvent. Anova data analysis
was not used for this DoE because this data analysis approach is valid
only in case of DoEs presenting only quantitative factors. A PLS fitting
model was used to determine the correlation between factors and responses.
This fitting model is used in case several responses were measured,
and the model is used to simultaneously represent the variation of
all the responses in response to the variation of the factors. Table describes the list
of quantitative and qualitative factors and the responses generated.
These factors and responses were selected to investigate the effect
of solid load, raw material PSD, crystallization and wash solvent
selection, wash solvent volume and drying time on final dried product
purity, PSD, and moisture content.
Table 1
DoE Factors and Responses
Selected
to Investigate a Multivariable Problem
factors
abbreviation
units
type
settings
API solid load
API
w/w (%)
quantitative
15–25
PSD (grade)
PSD
qualitative
micronized, powder
isolation pressure
FP
mbar
quantitative
200–800
crystallization solvent
Crys
qualitative
ethanol, isopropanol,
isoamyl alcohol
wash solvent
wash
qualitative
n-heptane, dodecane,
isopropyl acetate
volume of wash solventa
WV
volume ratio relative
to cake volume
quantitative
2–4
drying time
dry
s
quantitative
180–600
Wash solvent volume was automatically
calculated by the camera vision software. Knowing the tapped density
of paracetamol and cake volume after the filtration, the volume of
wash solvent added corresponded to 1, 2, or 3 void volumes in the
cake. Tapped density of micronized paracetamol corresponded to 0.46
g/mL, while typically crystalline (named also powder) corresponded
to 0.44 g/mL.
Wash solvent volume was automatically
calculated by the camera vision software. Knowing the tapped density
of paracetamol and cake volume after the filtration, the volume of
wash solvent added corresponded to 1, 2, or 3 void volumes in the
cake. Tapped density of micronized paracetamol corresponded to 0.46
g/mL, while typically crystalline (named also powder) corresponded
to 0.44 g/mL.In the Results and Discussions section,
the correlation between factors and responses are reported using the
coefficient plots. The coefficient plots provide graphical representation
of the significance of the model terms in explaining each experimentally
determined response. A significant term is one with a large distance
from y = 0 as well as having an uncertainty level
that does not extend across y = 0. A nonsignificant
model term is a model term close to y = 0 and with
an uncertainty level that crosses y = 0”.
The error bar expresses the 95% confidence interval that is related
to the coefficient. Some of the regression coefficient plot presented
in the Results and Discussions section reports
on the Y axis (responses) and presents the expression
“extended”. If a term in the model comprises a qualitative
factor, C, with k levels, there
will be k – 1 expanded terms associated with
that term for the regular option, whereas in the expanded option all
of the levels are correlated with the selected response. For example
considering the crystallization solvent as a qualitative factor, there
are three levels, ethanol, isopropanol, and isoamyl alcohol. In the
regular option for presenting the qualitative coefficients, MODDE
is plotting isopropanol and isoamyl alcohol, while the expanded option
is plotting all of the three levels.The effect plots and experimental
evidences observed during this
work were used together to qualitative define the optimal batch isolation
design space to be transfer to the semicontinuous experiment. The
combination of qualitative and quantitative factors used in this screening
DOE does not allow the prediction of the optimal design space. However,
the use of qualitative factors was needed to screen essential isolation
parameters.
Offline Filtrate and Cake
Characterization
Techniques
Offline sample characterization followed a precise
sequence to prevent destruction of material required for further characterization:Cake resistance and media resistance[10−12] and filtration
flow rate. Data were collected using the on-board vision system software.
Cake and filtrate masses were weighed at the end of each batch experiment.To determine how effectively the residual
solvent had
been removed, around 40 mg of “wet” filter cake was
collected at the end of the allocated drying time to determine the
total residual solvent and to quantify individual solvent residues
(percentage of crystallization and wash solvent). An AVII+600 NMR
spectrometer BRUKER ADVANCE 2+ (Bruker, UK) was used to collect proton
NMR spectra. The sample collection procedure was designed to gather
a representative sample of the wet product cake which once collected
was dissolved in 0.75 mL of DMSO-d. To determine
number of scansions, a T1/T2 relaxation time evaluation was performed
for all of the solvent combination (process parameters: frequency
axis F1 equals to 32, pulse program t1ir, 4 scans, 2 replicas of T1/T2
analysis to evaluate T1 relaxation). Samples were analyzed using 64
scans, corresponding to approximately 5 times T1. The time determined
from the T1/T2 relaxation time test (5T1) was required to maximize
peak to noise intensity and also to detect very small quantity of
proton signals from traces of solvents. Each sample was analyzed in
duplicate.Cakes were dried to stable
mass in a vacuum oven (Gallenkamp,
UK) at 50 °C and 20 mbar of reduced pressure to determine the
moisture content (loss on drying, LOD %).The acetanilide and metacetamol contents in filtrates
and cake were determined using HPLC; no filtrate assay was done during
the semicontinuous run. The reason for this is due to impractical
implications. There are catch bottles located underneath ports 1 to
5 used to separately collect the filtrate from each stage during optimization
mode. In production mode, the cakes are being processed simultaneously;
therefore, the filtrate from the first cake is then mixed with the
filtrate of the second cake, and the wash from the first cake would
mix with the wash from the second cake, etc. It is possible for the
operator to track the position of a cake and change the bottles underneath
each port to collect the filtrate and wash separately for one cake
and prevent mixing filtrate with filtrate from another cake. However,
this would require removing and replacing numerous bottles simultaneously.
This would also require the unit to be paused affecting the throughput
and alter the wash solvent contact time, therefore potentially capturing
mis-representative data. The new systems may include extra valves
and software in order to collect filtrate/wash samples from a cake
at certain intervals during a production run without the need to pause
the unit.The extent and strength of
agglomerates were measured
with a methodology proposed by Birch and Marziano’s.[7] The extent of agglomeration was determined by
measuring the mass of material retained by a 1 mm sieve (Endecotts
Ltd). The sieves were shaken by hand to avoid particle breakage. The
extent of agglomeration was calculated as the mass ratio of the mass
of agglomerates larger than 1 mm and the total sample mass. The strength
of agglomerates, also defined as friability or ABI index, was measured
by transferring the product particles to a sieve stack comprising
of 1 mm, 500, 250, and 180 μm sieves. The sieve column was shaken
for 180 s using a vortex shaker. Next, the mass of fraction retained
on each sieve was determined. This process of vortexing and weighing
was repeated to allow the extent of agglomeration and agglomerate
brittleness index (ABI) for each cake to be measured and calculated
in accordance to Birch and Marziano’s[7] approach, with every lump of particles bigger than 1 mm size being
considered an agglomerate.The PSD of
dried cake particles smaller than 1 mm was
measured using the same method used for the PSD raw paracetamol characterization.
Results and Discussions
Development of Batch Isolation Strategy
Antisolvent
Effect Screening
In Table , the volume ratio
of crystallization and wash solvent that minimize API dissolution
and avoid precipitation of fines and/or impurities during the first
washing step is reported. These solvent mixtures used, as first wash
solvent, were carefully selected to avoid paracetamol dissolution
from occurring—as might occur if the first wash done using
pure wash solvent, whilst also avoiding a drastic drop in solubility
during washing to prevent API or impuritiy precipitation.
Table 2
“Antisolvent Screening”
to Determine Suitable Wash Solvent Mixture for Washing 1 to Prevent
Nucleation of Particles from Mother Liquor and Reduce Paracetamol
Dissolutiona
heptane
dodecane
isopropyl acetate
ethanol
50–50% (v/v)
30–70% (v/v)
30–70% (v/v)
isopropanol
50–50% (v/v)
60–40% (v/v)
10–90% (v/v)
isoamyl alcohol
20–80% (v/v)
20–80% (v/v)
0–100% (v/v)
In bold is reported
the percentage
of pure crystallization solvent used to make the first wash solvent
mixture.
In bold is reported
the percentage
of pure crystallization solvent used to make the first wash solvent
mixture.
Effects
on Filtration
Three different
summary fittings were analyzed to determine parameters affecting the
parameters related to cake filtration: cake volume, filtrate flow
rate during filtration in port 1, and cake resistance. Variation of
cake volume (Figure ) after filtration in port 1 was mainly affected by driving force,
the nature of the crystallization solvent selected (cry). The coefficient
plot (Figure ) shows
low reproducibility value caused by the variation of results obtained
within the center points (replicates of each response is reported
in the Supporting Information section).
The R2 and Q2 values showed good fit between data and model and the model capability
to predict responses. The variation of cake volume after filtration
seems to be affected by the driving force (FP) applied during filtration
that has a direct impact on the compressibility of the cake. As reported
elsewhere,[3] organic powder generally shows
a compressibility index lower or in some cases higher than one. From
experimental approach, the compressibility index of the different
paracetamol grades was verified to be in this range (micronized compressibility
index is equal to 0.2327 and for typical crystalline is 0.3976). Cake
volume appeared to be affected by the nature of the crystallization
solvent used, mainly ethanol and isoamyl alcohol, suggesting the impact
of the solvent density. In the case of isoamyl alcohol, the final
cake volume was higher with respect to the other crystallization solvents
(ethanol, 0.789 g/mL, isopropanol, 0.786 g/mL and isoamyl alcohol,
0.81 g/mL), showing how denser solvent can reduce the capability of
cake packing.
Figure 5
DoE variables that affect cake volume during filtration, R2 = 0.53, Q2 = 0.26,
reproducibility = −0.2.
DoE variables that affect cake volume during filtration, R2 = 0.53, Q2 = 0.26,
reproducibility = −0.2.The filtrate flow rate (Figure ) was another key parameter used to evaluate the processability
of the slurry.[3] The filtrate flow rate
seems to be affected by crystallization solvent properties, the driving
force applied, and by the PSD (grade). The coefficient plot (Figure ) shows low reproducibility
value caused by the variation of results obtained within the center
points (replicates of each response is reported in the Supporting Information section). The R2 and Q2 values
showed modest fit between data and model and the model capability
to predict responses. The characteristics of the crystallization solvent
used affect the filtrate flow rate. This could be related with the
viscosity of the mother liquor. As described from the Darcy’s
equation (volumetric flow rate),[43] faster
flow rates were observed for less viscous solvents (ethanol, 1.61
cP, isopropanol, 2.88 cP, isoamyl alcohol, 4.81 cP). As expected also
the filtration driving force is positively affecting the filtrate
flow rate: the higher the driving force, the higher the filtration
flow rate achieved.
Figure 6
DoE variables that affect filtrate flow rate during filtration, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.44,
reproducibility = 1.
DoE variables that affect filtrate flow rate during filtration, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.44,
reproducibility = 1.The grade of paracetamol
from which the filter cake was formed
seems affecting the filtrate flow rate:[43] during filtration, finer particles tended to migrate towards the
filter medium reducing the void volume and increasing the tortuosity
of the cake adjacent to the filter medium. This phenomenon impacted
also cake resistance, resulting in a gradient of alpha along the axis
of the cake;[44,45] this also slows washing and deliquoring,
potentially causing higher moisture content in the deliquored cake.
As known, cake resistance is calculated using the filtrate flow rate,
as described by the Darcy’s equation.[43] Increasing the solid content in slurry and reducing driving force
also reduced the filtrate flow rate. This is in agreement with the
findings in Figure , as the impact of solid loading is negatively related to the filtrate
flow rate.Figure shows that
the selection of crystallization solvent also potentially impacted
crystal purity, not only the filtration performances (Figures and 6).
Figure 7
DoE variables that affect the concentration of orthocetamol in
the first filtrate collected during filtration, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.44, reproducibility
= 1.
DoE variables that affect the concentration of orthocetamol in
the first filtrate collected during filtration, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.44, reproducibility
= 1.As seen from Figure , the concentration of orthocetamol
removed during filtration is
affected by the grade of the paracetamol used to generate the cake
and by the nature of the crystallization solvent. The coefficient
plot (Figure ) shows
good reproducibility value and good fit between data and model and
the model capability to predict responses. The reason of this correlation
between impurity removal and crystallization properties can be correlated
to two different solvent properties:Solubility of the impurity in the crystallization solvent:
the higher the impurity solubility, the bigger the quantity of impurity
dissolved into the filtrate and the higher the removal during filtration; Figure indeed shows a direct
correlation between the concentration of orthocetamol removed and
the solubility of this compound in the solvent. The solubility of
orthocetamol in ethanol, 2-propanol, and isoamyl alcohol was predicted
using COSMOTherm method, and the solubility of orthocetamol
was observed to be higher in ethanol (the solubility of orthocetamol
in ethanol is 0.106 g/g at 22 °C, the solubility of orthocetamol
in 2-propanol is 0.056 g/g at 22 °C, and the solubility of orthocetamol
in isoamyl alcohol is 0.044 g/g at 22 °C). However, a disadvantage
of choosing a solvent in which API related impurities are soluble
is that the API is also likely to be quite soluble causing a corresponding
reduction of crystallization yield.[1] Of
the three crystallization solvents evaluated in this study isoamyl
alcohol appears to be the most promising candidate based on the quantity
of API remaining in solution at 20 °C (ethanol, 0.184 g/g of
solvent, isopropanol, 0.109 g/g, isoamyl alcohol, 0.047 g/g at 20
°C). However, analyzing the impurity concentration in the mother
liquors, the capability of this solvent to remove impurities is lower
than the other two solvent due to lower API and impurity solubility
and higher viscosity. Therefore, the second most promising crystallization
solvent is 2-propanol for its low API solubility and high impurity
solubility.The viscosity of the solvent
inversely affect the capability
to remove the impurity, as seen in the case of isoamyl alcohol: higher
the solvent viscosity, lower the quantity of impurity removal. This
effect is here amplified by the low impurity solubility in isoamyl
alcohol. The increased viscosity makes it more difficult to remove
the solvent from small capillaries in the cake, reducing the efficiency
in displacing mother liquor during washing.[1] As suggested in previous research, the viscosity of mother liquor
and wash solvent should be similar to promote good displacement washing.[46]
Effects
on Washing
To investigate
how the variables selected in the DoE affect washing, the effect of
wash driving force, wash solvent properties, wash quantity, and the
interaction between mother liquor and wash solvent were investigated
with regard to the individual impurity concentrations in both filtrate
and cake. The % of wash solvent relative to the overall residual solvent
quantity after drying, the ABI index and the extent of agglomeration
were also investigated.The residual moisture content composition,
evaluated as relative percentage of residual mother liquor (Figure ) and wash solvent (Figure ) after drying, varies in relation to the properties of the
wash solvent. The coefficient plot (Figures and 9) shows good
reproducibility value and good fit between data and model; however,
the model capability to predict responses is not adequate to get good
model prediction. The property that seems to affect the residual wash
and mother liquor solvent content after drying is the boiling point
of the wash solvent. n-Dodecane has a high boiling
point and so becomes a dominant factor when employed as the wash solvent.
In case the boiling point of the crystallization solvent is higher
than the wash solvent, a relative abundance of residual crystallization
solvent is expected (e.g., isopropyl acetate and n-heptane).
Figure 9
Fitting summary of variable
affecting the relative percentage of
crystallization solvent in the dried cake moisture content, R2 = 0.63, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = −0.2.
Figure 8
Fitting summary of variable affecting the relative percentage of
wash solvent in the dried cake moisture content, R2 = 0.63, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = 0.97.
Fitting summary of variable affecting the relative percentage of
wash solvent in the dried cake moisture content, R2 = 0.63, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = 0.97.Fitting summary of variable
affecting the relative percentage of
crystallization solvent in the dried cake moisture content, R2 = 0.63, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = −0.2.The effect of the selected DoE factors on the orthocetamol concentration
in the second filtrate (wash 1) is shown in Figure . The paracetamol grade, solid content,
and properties of the crystallization solvent mainly affect the removal
of orthocetamol during the first wash. The coefficient plot (Figures and 9) shows a good reproducibility value and good fit between
data and model and the model capability to predict responses. API
solid load and particle size grade also affected impurity removal:
typical crystalline paracetamol has larger crystals which form larger
interparticle channels where the solvent can easily flow and displace
any mother liquor present.[43] The cake height
also affected the wash performance, which can be seen in Figure . Higher the cake,
more the chance to trap impurity and so forming a gradient of purity,
where the surface of the cake shows the purest part, while the cake
near the filter and near the walls shows the highest impurity content.
Figure 10
Second
filtrate orthocetamol concentration fittings with DoE variables, R2 = 0.77, Q2 = 0.51,
reproducibility = 0.64.
Second
filtrate orthocetamol concentration fittings with DoE variables, R2 = 0.77, Q2 = 0.51,
reproducibility = 0.64.During wash 1, as reported
in Section , the wash solvent used was a mixture
of pure crystallization and wash solvent. As seen in Figure , the solvent properties that
mainly affect the impurity removal are the impurity solubility and
the solvent viscosity. From Figure , the combination of ethanol as the crystallization
solvent and n-heptane as wash solvent shows an enhancement
the purity of cake, higher than other solvents combinations. Conversely
the combination of isoamyl alcohol as the crystallization solvent
and isopropyl acetate as the wash solvent yields the poorest washing
outcome due to the big difference in the solvent viscosity and the
1 order of magnitude higher API solubility in isopropyl acetate (0.0076
g/g at 25 °C) with respect to the other wash solvents (n-heptane, 0.0001 g/g and n-dodecane 0.0007
g/g at 25 °C).Figure shows
how the selected factors affect the concentration of orthocetamol
impurity in filtrate removed from the filter cake during wash 2. The
coefficient plot (Figure ) shows good reproducibility value and good fit between data
and model, and model and the model capability to predict responses.
This plot needs to be considered in the opposite way compared to Figure . Here, the presence
of higher concentrations of the impurity in the third filtrate relates
to poor washing. This is mainly influenced by the grade of paracetamol,
the properties of the crystallization and wash solvents (solubility
and viscosity), the driving force used, and the quantity of wash solvent
used. The PSD of the cake can be correlated to the porosity and tortuosity
of the cake. Higher cake tortuosity, as seen in micronized paracetamol,
increases the propensity to trap impure mother liquor in the cake
during filtration and wash 1 and lowers the capability of wash 2 to
completely remove the impure mother liquor.[43,47]
Figure 11
Dependence of the concentration of the impurity orthocetamol in
the different wash solvents on the DoE variables, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.37, reproducibility
= 0.96.
Dependence of the concentration of the impurity orthocetamol in
the different wash solvents on the DoE variables, R2 = 0.69, Q2 = 0.37, reproducibility
= 0.96.The properties of crystallization
and wash solvent affecting the
washing efficiency in wash 2 are the solubility of the impurity and
viscosity. The effect of n-dodecane should be similar
to that of n-heptane, due to their similar viscosity
(n-heptane 0.4 cP, n-dodecane 1.36
cP, isopropyl acetate 0.8 cP from Detherm database[48]). Further investigation into the effect of dodecane washing
needs to be considered, even though fitting validity and reproducibility
show high values. As reported in Section , Figure , isopropanol (2-propanol) or ethanol are considered
the best cases of mother liquor because the API loss by dissolution
in mother liquor is less than ethanol, due to the relative lower solubility.
However, to remove the possible impurities deposited on the crystal
surface, ethanol is suggested as the solvent, to allow partial crystal
surface dissolution and therefore prevent impurity incorporation into
the isolated material.From Figure ,
it is possible to infer that the ideal isolation strategy was the
washing of a small typical crystalline paracetamol cake with an ethanol–n-heptane mixture in wash 1 and with pure n-heptane in wash 2 using a total of four void volumes of wash solvent
(1 in wash 1 and 3 in wash 2), using a low driving force to maximize
the contact time to enhance dilution and diffusion washing mechanisms.
Effects on Drying
Drying was accomplished
in port 5, without agitation, by flowing ambient air through the wet
cake under reduced pressure. Lekhal et al.[19] reported that wet particles tend to agglomerate during static drying
under reduced pressure. The lack of agitation and consequent absence
of disruption of aggregates allows strong interparticle bridges to
form as solute saturated solvent evaporates from the points of contact
between particles. The supply of material to form interparticle bridges
was determined by the quantity of residual solvent evaporated and
the amount of solute dissolved in it.The effects of the variables
investigated in the DoE; PSD, extent of agglomeration (particles bigger
than 1 mm), agglomerate strength of the final dried material, and
the LOD after drying are summarized in the subsequent plots.Figure focuses
on the final solvent content in dried samples (LOD). The coefficient
plot (Figure ) shows
good reproducibility value and good fit between data and model and
the model capability to predict responses. The factors which influenced
this in order of decreasing importance are the paracetamol grade,
wash solvent identity, volume of wash solvent used, nature of the
crystallization solvent, paracetamol grade, and drying time. There
is an inverse correlation between particle size and the LOD: the lower
the particle size the higher the quantity of residual solvent retained.
The wash solvent properties affecting the LOD are the wash solvent
viscosity (more viscous solvents are more readily retained), the boiling
point, and enthalpy of vaporization of the wash solvent that affect
the ease of removal during drying, where n-heptane
and isopropyl acetate are more easily removed than dodecane (n-heptane 98.42 °C, 36.6 J/mol, isopropyl acetate 89
°C, 37 J/mol, dodecane 216.2 °C, 62.1 J/mol). The amount
of wash solvent used to displace the mother liquor affects the LOD:
in cases where the volatility of the wash solvent is higher than the
mother liquor, increasing the volume of wash solvent promotes the
removal of the mother liquor and therefore the reduction of the LOD.
The crystallization solvent properties affecting the LOD are the solvent
viscosity and volatility. Ethanol, the least viscous and most volatile
crystallization solvent, is retained least, causing a reduction of
the LOD. As expected, the drying time is affecting the LOD: longer
drying produces a drier product.
Figure 12
DoE variables that affect LOD of the
dried samples, R2 = 0.92, Q2 = 0.59, reproducibility
= 0.99.
DoE variables that affect LOD of the
dried samples, R2 = 0.92, Q2 = 0.59, reproducibility
= 0.99.Combining all these factors, the
most favorable conditions occurred
under the following conditions: API particle size was large, ethanol
was the crystallization solvent, washing was completed with four cake
void volumes of n-heptane using a low driving pressure
to promote displacement, diffusional, and dilution washing, and this
was followed by an extended drying period.The coefficient plot
(Figures and 14) shows a good reproducibility
value and good fit between data and model. Figure shows good model capability to predict
responses, while Figure does not, showing that the effect plot does not show meaningful
factor–responses correlations. It can be seen from Figure that solid loading,
paracetamol PSD, the nature of the crystallization and wash solvents,
and the volume of wash solvent affected the extent of agglomeration.
The mechanical strength of the agglomerates formed (hard or soft agglomerates,
described by the ABI index) seems to be affected by the paracetamol
grade and solid load, by the nature of the crystallization and wash
solvent, and by the drying time. The higher solid loading increased
the agglomeration propensity whilst producing harder agglomerates.
This effect is due to the mechanism of drying.[20] During this constant rate drying step,[49] the drying front progresses from the cake surface through
to the bulk whilst the moisture content in the cake decreases linearly
and it is only limited by the gas flow. During this step, agglomeration
starts from the upper surface and slowly progresses through the bulk
where the transport of unbonded moisture is occurring through the
particle–particle capillaries. In case of thin cakes, if the
material in the upper cake portion stays in contact with the solvent
for longer periods, then the material after drying has a rather hard
shell or crust and a relatively soft core. On the contrary, for thicker
cakes, capillary forces cannot effectively transport the moisture
from the bulk of the cake to the surface. In this case, after constant
rate drying, the process is driven by moisture diffusion through the
cake during the falling rate period (slower drying rate), causing
an even distribution of cake moisture and formation of a single solid
block.
Figure 13
DoE variables that affect extent of agglomeration of the dried
samples, R2 = 0.9, Q2 = 0.55, reproducibility = 0.9.
Figure 14
DoE
variables that affect ABI index of the dried samples, R2 = 0.39, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = 1.
DoE variables that affect extent of agglomeration of the dried
samples, R2 = 0.9, Q2 = 0.55, reproducibility = 0.9.DoE
variables that affect ABI index of the dried samples, R2 = 0.39, Q2 = −0.2,
reproducibility = 1.The particle size and
particle shape played a role on deliquoring
results: as reported by Wakeman,[43] increasing
particle size shortens deliquoring time due to the increase in gas
flow rate through the cake. On the contrary, fine solids provide larger
surface area than bulky particles, producing faster drying. Effective
moisture removal during the constant rate period was affected by surface
area, while the internal particle morphology (or porosity) limits
the falling rate period. Moreover, PSD affected the enthalpy transfer
mechanism: as a particle dries, the outer layers shield further heat
propagation and form a diffusion barrier. In the case of large bulky
porous particles, removing all the liquid from the core requires prolonged
drying times. Therefore, whilst finer particles dry rapidly, the larger
particles begin to dominate the whole process. Wide PSDs increased
the risk of agglomerate formation and cake hardening due to finer
particles located in small voids of the cake that can act as bridge
formation agents.[50] On the other hand,
finer particles tended to form hard agglomerates.As reported
in Figures and 14, also the nature of crystallization
and wash solvent also affect the agglomeration propensity and the
strength of agglomerates during drying. One approach to reduce agglomeration
is therefore to tailor the wash solvent composition to minimize concentration
of the highly soluble component before the drying stage. Papageorgiou
et al.[51] investigated how solvent selection
can influence particle agglomeration analyzing the effect of solvent
selection and critical moisture content.[52] From Figure ,
isoamyl alcohol could be considered a good candidate as crystallization
solvent, but, as stated in Section , due to the different viscosity with
respect to the wash solvent isoamyl alcohol was difficult to remove
during washing. This may then cause bridge formation with high mechanical
resistance (low ABI index), as seen in Figure , where the ABI index seems to be influenced
by the nature of the crystallization and wash solvents. Therefore,
isopropanol or ethanol was preferred as crystallization solvent, even
if ethanol showed higher propensity to form agglomerates.The
extent of agglomeration can be reduced by increasing the quantity
of wash solvent: increasing the wash solvent volume of the pure wash
solvent (wash 2) from 1 to 3 cake void volumes causes a drastic reduction
of crystallization solvent/mother liquor trapped in the cake during
the drying process. The best wash solvent to use for reducing agglomeration
propensity is n-heptane due to the very low API solubility
(see Supporting Information section) and
the lower boiling point and enthalpy of vaporization. Even if n-dodecane showed solubility similar to n-heptane, this solvent has the highest boiling temperature; thus,
during drying, the lower drying rate would also cause agglomeration.
Isopropyl acetate was the poorest wash solvent, as its high API solubility
allowed the formation of extensive agglomerates with a low ABI index
(hard agglomerates). Finally, agglomeration and strength of aggregates
can be reduced by increasing the drying time.PSD of particles
smaller than 1 mm were analyzed to determine if
agglomeration mechanisms were also observed in single particles. In
general, the particle size increase was observed in all of the samples.
As seen for the extent of agglomeration, PSD of single particles was
affected by the solvent selection, paracetamol grade, wash volume
used, driving force (reducing the driving force increases in the wash
solvent contact time and removal of impurities and mother liquor),
and drying time. The PSD plots of the raw paracetamol compared with
the different samples are reported in the Supporting Information.
Semicontinuous Run
To verify the
transferability of the isolation strategy developed in optimization
batch mode, a semicontinuous test was carried out using the CFD25
in production mode (details in the Materials and
Methods section); optimized isolation parameters were qualitatively
selected using the correlation plots. The set point validation tools
provided by MODDE to identify the optimized parameter region could
not be used due to the qualitative and quantitative nature of factors
selected. In particular, in Sections , 3.1.3, and 3.1.4, detailed descriptions of the method used to
select the optimal isolation parameter are reported. The parameters
selected are reported in Table . The suspension was prepared using the same procedure described
in the Materials and Methods section.
Table 3
Isolation Strategy Selected for the
Semicontinuous Run
suspension properties
range
mother liquor composition
saturated solution of paracetamol in ethanol, containing 2% mol/mol of acetanilide, and metacetamol
solid load (%, w/w)
25
slurry dose feed in port 1 (mL)
65
driving force filtration and washing (mbar)
500
wash solvent 1
ethanol/n-heptane = 50:50 (% v/v)
wash solvent 2
n-heptane
wash solvent 1 volume (corresponding to cake void volumes)
0.44
wash solvent 2 volume (corresponding to cake void volumes)
three washes of 0.44 void fractions
drying time (s)
180
drying gas temperature (°C)
room temperature (25 °C)
The semicontinuous run lasted for 10 h and 40 min.
After every
7 indexes (i.e., after every 7 cakes were filtered in port position
1), an automatic WIP sequence was carried out to avoid filter blinding
and therefore increase the overall throughput during extended semicontinuous
runs. The WIP sequence is described in Section . In total, 724 g of semidry material
was produced with a throughput of 1.13 g/min (approximately 68 g/h).
The average LOD was 12.1 ± 5.2% with a mean residual solvent
composition of 83.7 ± 0.2% of wash solvent and 16.3 ± 0.2%
of crystallization solvent was produced with a throughput of 1.13
g/min (approximately 68 g/h). A sample was collected for every full
rotation of the carousel. A total of eight samples were collected
after drying and analyzed to determine the consistency of samples
throughout the semicontinuous run and to compare the properties of
these samples with the properties predicted with the screening DoE.The residual solvent content and composition obtained during the
semicontinuous run and the data predicted by the DoE are quite different:
the predicted LOD is close to zero, while the composition of the residual
solvent is 50.4% as wash solvent and 49.6% of crystallization solvent.
LOD and residual solvent composition of each sample analyzed is reported
in the Supporting Information section.
It is thought that this may be partially due to a lower drying gas
flowrate through each cake when using production mode, compared to
the flowrate through the cake in optimization mode. When drying in
optimization mode, the gas flows through a 4 mm ID, 2 m length heated
transfer line and one cake. When drying in production mode, the gas
flows through the same heated transfer line and then shared between
5 cakes. The gas flowrate will be improved on future units by providing
a larger ID heated transfer line. Pressure regulators on the inlet
of the drying gas will be included to allow the use of compressed
air with an inlet pressure of +250 mbar. In addition to these improvements,
a floating base has been designed for the filter base, allowing for
an improved seal between the base of the carousel and the filter base
on future units.The discrepancy of measured and expected values
could also be caused
by some issues observed during the semicontinuous run. A summary of
the issues observed and the solutions to these challenges have been
outlined in Section .Filtration flow rate and cake resistance of the different
samples
collected during the semicontinuous run were calculated to determine
the consistency of filtration (Table ).
Table 4
Calculated Values of Flow Rate and
Cake Resistance During Filtration in Port 1 of the Different Samples
Collected During the Semicontinuous Run
sample
flow rate (mL/s)—mean 0.0253 mL/s, st dev 0.0084 mL/s
cake resistance (m/kg)—mean 6.44 × 1010 m/kg, st dev 3.41 × 1010 m/kg
1
0.0097
1.39 × 1011
2
0.0180
8.76 × 1010
3
0.0293
5.09 × 1010
4
0.0310
4.54 × 1010
5
0.0329
4.24 × 1010
6
0.0301
4.34 × 1010
7
0.0317
4.22 × 1010
8
0.0200
6.37 × 1010
The flow rate gradually increases with the number
of cycles, reaching
a stable value after cycle 3: clean in place takes place every 7 cakes
formed, this prevents blockage of the filter media with consequent
increase of the filtrate flow rate. To get comparable flow rates with
respect to the first run and those following, it is recommended that
the unit is washed thoroughly at the end of each semicontinuous run
to prevent crystallization of the material that blocks the system
at the beginning of a future run.Cake resistance values of
the different cakes show comparable values,
showing that the filtration process is consistent throughout the entire
semicontinuous run (Table ).Comparing flow rate and cake resistance of the semicontinuous
run
with the values predicted with the DoE model, the values are orders
of magnitude of difference (batch predicted values: flow rate = 2.2–2.4
mL/s and cake resistance ≈ 109 m/kg; semicontinuous
run average values: flow rate = 0.025 ± 0.008 mL/s and cake resistance
= 6.44 × 1010 ± 3.41 × 1010 m/kg).
These discrepancies are mainly due to the extent of filter media obstruction:
during the batch experiments, all of the ports are carefully cleaned
before each run (approximately 1 L of WIP solvent was used to clean
the entire carousel and filter plate after processing each cake in
optimization mode), whereas during semicontinuous experiments after
every 7 cakes formed, the automated WIP sequence draws a 25–30
mL aliquot of WIP solvent through ports 1 to 4 to wash the filter
plates. Improving the WIP procedure used during semicontinuous operation
can reduce the risk of filter media blockage and consequently improve
the filtration flow rate and cake resistance.Analyzing the
cake purity of the eight samples, those were mainly
formed of paracetamol with traces of acetanilide (area ratio paracetamol/acetanilide
= 1:0.013 ± 0.0012) with an average cake composition determined
by HPLC of 133.44 ± 22.25 μg/mL of paracetamol and 1.79
± 0.22 μg/mL of acetanilide. HPLC calibration curves and
purity of each sample are reported in the Supporting Information section.The isolated cakes were analyzed
to obtain information about the
extent of agglomeration, the particle–particle aggregation
(aggregates size less than 1 mm) and the agglomerate strength. Measured
values of these product properties for each sample are reported in
the Supporting Information section.The samples collected during the semicontinuous run showed comparable
extent of agglomeration: the mean value measured was 56.4 ± 0.14%.
The strength of these agglomerates was consistent throughout the eight
samples, showing the formation of hard agglomerates (mean ABI index
was 0.28 ± 0.15). These values were compared with the values
predicted by the DoE, and the results modeled are in good agreement
with the experimental data (modeled extent of agglomeration corresponded
to a range between 56 and 58%, whereas the ABI index modeled was in
a range of 0.3–0.35). The formation of hard agglomerates is
due to the presence of residual mother liquor in the dried cake which
is able to promote strong particle–particle bridges formation.Particle–particle aggregation was observed in all of the
eight samples; mean volumetric diameter (x50) and sauter mean diameter (SMD) of the samples collected during
the semicontinuous run corresponded to 85 ± 7 and 69 ± 6
μm, whereas raw powder paracetamol presented x50 and SMD values of 67 and 47 μm. Cumulative distribution
graph of the samples is reported in the Supporting Information section.
Solutions for Resolving
Issues Observed
during Semicontinuous Run
Table summarizes the issues observed during the
semicontinuous run. Some of these issues have been resolved on the
future units, and others are being addressed. The solutions to the
challenges are also described in Table , all of which serve to reduce the risk of inconsistency
of solvent removal during the filtration, washing, and deliquoring
processes.
Table 5
Observations During 11 h of Semicontinuous
Operation of the CFD25; Includes the Time of Occurrence, Number of
Cakes Where the Issue Was Observed, and Solutions to the Challenges
observation during semicontinuous run
solution(s)
filtration (port 1, 2, and 3) did not halt at dry land due to slurry splashes on the walls of
the tube. This resulted in non-consistent deliquoring in port 4
splashes on the tube walls may cause the camera to briefly
detect the splashes as a light-to-dark transition, therefore incorrectly measuring this splash as the liquid
level
to prevent this, if
the liquid level detected by the camera
momentarily jumps to another position, the software will ignore this
and continue to measure the true liquid level
note: in cases where filtration and/or washing is protracted, the process was set to stop after a defined
period and index to the next stage regardless of the residual solvent
volume left behind, as described in Section 2.4.3.1
other vision system
software improvements will be made to increase
robustness of dryland detection, e.g., viewing windows and time windows
will be adjusted to improve reliability
blockage
of filter plate, resulting in liquid volume not being
fully drawn through the cake. This resulted in the cake being indexed
to the next stage with a larger quantity of solvent on top of the
cake than desired
the filter plate in port 1 will
contain the most fines, and therefore most likely be the first filter
plate to blind. A “back pulse” feature will be added to port 1 where
a back pulse of compressed air will be applied to the filter plate
before each aliquot of slurry is dispensed, helping to clear fines
from the filter plate therefore improving filtration performance
improvement to WIP sequence. For
example, WIP sequence will
now include a “contact time” to allow more time for WIP solvent to dissolve material within the
filter plate before being drawn through the filter plate
drops of solvent falling into the tube, resulting in disturbance
of meniscus, leading to loss of liquid level detection
reduction of solvent dropping from the atomizer by reversing
the pump after dispensing
a “drip-check” feature
will be added to the software to ignore any disruption to
the meniscus
Conclusions
The pharmaceutical industry is
in the process of embracing continuous
manufacturing of APIs in order to reduce production cost, improve
manufacturing flexibility, reduce infrastructure cost to improve consistency
of API quality critical attributes, and to reduce manufacturing lead
time and to improve sustainability by reducing waste generation.To reduce time and to minimize material consumption during new
drug/process development, it is fundamental that the isolation development
strategy is studied using adaptable laboratory equipment to avoid
extra investigation to adapt the design strategy to a semicontinuous
isolation system.The CFD25 can be used to first develop the
isolation strategy in
batch approach and then to isolate in semicontinuous mode slurries
without the requirement of modifying the process design.To
verify the process transferability between batch and semicontinuous
CFD25 production modes, a screening DoE approach was used to study
the effect of API solid load, input PSD particles, crystallization
solvent nature, isolation driving force, wash solvent nature, wash
solvent volume used, and drying time to develop the isolation strategy
to use during the run. The aim of the project was to verify the consistency
of isolated material properties during the semicontinuous run and
to get comparable material attributes between batch and semicontinuous
production.Material attributes considered were product purity,
residual solvent
content and composition, filtration properties (cake resistance and
flow rate), agglomeration extent, and strength and particle–particle
aggregate size. The unit’s productivity and throughput were
measured during the semicontinuous run.By using the CFD25 in
optimization mode, it was possible in 2 weeks
to run a full set of DOE experiments and full product characterization
to determine the best isolation strategy for the API analyzed. The
duration of the work on the CFD25 was around 5 days.The DoE
predicted that the best isolation strategy would achieve
an LOD close to zero, while the composition of the residual solvent
would be 50.4 and 49.6% for wash solvent and crystallization solvent,
respectively.The isolation strategy selected during the screening
DoE was replicated
during 11 h of semicontinuous operation, where a total of eight samples
were periodically collected to investigate process consistency, the
sampling rate was every 7th cake ejected.Overall, 724 g of
partially dried material with an average LOD
of 12.1% was produced with a throughput of 1.13 g/min (approximately
68 g/h). The total cycle time for filtration, washing, and drying
for each cake was between 40 and 60 min. The average residual solvent
composition of the cakes was 84% of the wash solvent and 16% of the
crystallization solvent.The discrepancy in LOD and solvent
composition values from the
semicontinuous run compared to the predicted values from the DoE was
due to a combination of reasons, including filter media blockage,
solvent splashing causing incorrect detection of liquid level, and
low drying gas flow through each cake. The solutions to these observations
have been discussed in this paper and have been implemented in future
designs, improving both robustness and performance of the AWL continuous
filter dryer.The flow rate during filtration, cake resistance,
cake purity,
extent of agglomeration, agglomerate strength, and aggregate size
were consistent throughout the samples collected, showing that the
unit can produce consistent isolated material. Comparing the measured
product properties of the isolated material produced during the semicontinuous
run and the corresponding data modeled from a DoE reveals that agglomerates
and aggregates properties were comparable showing the capability of
the unit to easily transfer a batch process development set of experiment
to a semicontinuous process.
Authors: Sara Ottoboni; Chris J Price; Christopher Steven; Elizabeth Meehan; Alastair Barton; Paul Firth; Andy Mitchell; Furqan Tahir Journal: J Pharm Sci Date: 2018-09-06 Impact factor: 3.534
Authors: Sara Ottoboni; Bruce Wareham; Antony Vassileiou; Murray Robertson; Cameron J Brown; Blair Johnston; Chris J Price Journal: Org Process Res Dev Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 3.317