Literature DB >> 32336661

Is there evidence of intra-uterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in samples tested by quantitative RT-PCR?

Isaac Cheruiyot1, Brandon Michael Henry2, Giuseppe Lippi3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32336661      PMCID: PMC7166035          DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The COVID-19 pneumonia was first reported in Wuhan, Hubei province in China in late December 2019. The disease has since quickly spread worldwide, and has been declared a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. According to current evidence, COVID-19 is mainly transmitted with close contact through respiratory droplets (such as coughing) and by fomites [2]. Pregnancy presents a unique immunological situation, characterized by increased susceptibility to some infectious diseases, including respiratory pathogens. Pregnant women could hence be at higher risk of severe acute respiratory disease coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection compared to the general population [3]. In previous pandemics such as H1N1, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), pregnant women seemed to have poor clinical and obstetric outcomes and higher mortality compared to non-pregnant women [4]. Nonetheless, the even limited data available on COVID-19 in pregnant women would suggest that these patients have similar clinical course as non-pregnant women [5], despite concerns for possibility of increased risk of preterm delivery and low birth weight [6]. The potential of vertical mother-to-child transmission of COVID-19 infection is also still unclear. We therefore analyzed current literature to identify any evidence of vertical transmission. A systematic electronic search was carried out in Medline (PubMed interface) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) using the keywords “vertical transmission” OR “maternal to fetal transmission” OR “pregnancy outcomes” AND “coronavirus 2019” OR “2019-nCoV” OR “SARS-CoV-2”, between 2019 and present time (i.e.,11th April, 2020), without applying language restrictions. The title, abstract and full text of all documents identified with these search criteria were assessed to identify studies reporting information vertical transmission of COVID-19. The reference lists of all documents were also analyzed to identify any additional eligible studies. Intra-uterine vertical transmission was defined as positive identification of SARS-CoV-2 in placenta, amniotic fluid, cord blood or neonatal pharyngeal/ throat swabs through reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) taken immediately after birth. The initial search produced 40 potentially relevant articles. Following primary screening and assessment by full text for eligibility in the meta-analysis, 35 articles were excluded since they were review articles (n = 11), commentaries or other editorial materials (n = 8), or did not contain data on vertical transmission of COVID-19 patients (n = 16). Overall, 5 studies (n = 16 pregnant COVID-19 patients) were included in the final analysis [5,[7], [8], [9], [10]]. All studies were from China. In all women, the onset of symptoms and subsequent diagnosis with COVID-19 was late in pregnancy (3rd trimester). All but one delivered via caesarian section. None of the specimens tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (Table 1 ). These findings therefore suggest that there is there is currently no evidence of intra-uterine vertical mother to child transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in samples tested by RT-PCR method.
Table 1

Characteristics of the studies included in the analysis.

AuthorRegionNo. of patients tested for vertical transmissionGestational age at onset of symptoms/ diagnosis of COVID-19Mode of deliverySpecimens testedNumber of positive tests
Lei et al. [7]China4 women; 4 neonates3rd trimesterCaesarian sectionamniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, neonatal nasopharyngeal swabs0
Chen et al. [8]China3 women3rd trimesterCaesarian sectionPlacenta0
Chen et al. [8]China6 women; 6 neonates3rd trimester (36−39 weeks)Caesarian sectionamniotic fluid, cord blood,neonatal throat swab0
Fan et a. [9]China2 women; 2 neonates3rd trimester (36 & 37 weeks)Caesarian sectionnewborn’s nasopharyngeal swab, maternal serum, placenta tissues, umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid0
Xiong et al. [10]China1 woman; 1 neonate3rd trimester (33 weeks)Vaginal deliveryamniotic fluid, neonatal throat swab0
Characteristics of the studies included in the analysis. That being said, there are reports on neonatal COVID-19 infections whose mode of transmission is still unclear. For instance, Yu et al., [11] in their retrospective analysis of pregnancy outcomes in COVID-19 patients reported one neonate who tested positive for COVID-19 36 h after delivery. Nucleic tests of placenta and cord blood were negative for SARS-CoV-2, thus indicating the unlikely possibility of vertical transmission. Similarly, Dong et al. [12], reported a case of “possible vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2” based on elevated SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies (IgG and IgM) in neonatal serum samples taken 2 h after delivery. Since IgM cannot cross the placenta, the possibility of intra-uterine transmission cannot be completely ruled out. Five RT-PCR tests on neonatal nasopharyngeal swabs taken from 2 h to 16 days of age were however negative. Importantly, an optimal COVID-19 testing method for neonates has yet to be established. In conclusion, there is currently no definitive evidence of intra-uterine vertical transmission of COVID-19 in pregnant women diagnosed in the third trimester. All patients included in the current analysis developed symptoms and were diagnosed with COVID-19 late in pregnancy (3rd trimester). The potential of intra-uterine vertical COVID-19 transmission in the first and second trimester is still unknown. High quality studies are urgently needed to further investigate vertical transmission and risks of severe COVID-19 infections in pregnant women.

Funding

No funding was sort for this study.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interests with regard to this publication.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kristine Jeganathan; Anthea Bm Paul
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2022-06

Review 2.  Adverse outcomes in SAR-CoV-2 (COVID-19) and SARS virus related pregnancies with probable vertical transmission.

Authors:  Gulam Bahadur; Roy Homburg; Wai Yoong; Cheentan Singh; Mamta Bhat; Phalguni Kotabagi; Santanu Acharya; Judith Huirne; Pablo Alexis Doreski; Mariusz Łukaszuk; Asif Muneer
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-07-14

3.  Possible Vertical Transmission of COVID-19 to the Newborn; a Case Report.

Authors:  Yekta Parsa; Nazila Shokri; Tayebeh Jahedbozorgan; Zahra Naeiji; Shahrzad Zadehmodares; Atefeh Moridi
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2020-11-14

4.  Questionnaire-based vs universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery.

Authors:  Elad Mei-Dan; Abheha Satkunaratnam; Tal Cahan; Marian Leung; Kevin Katz; Amir Aviram
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.081

5.  Does Lung Ultrasound Have a Role in the Clinical Management of Pregnant Women with SARS COV2 Infection?

Authors:  Maria Grazia Porpora; Lucia Merlino; Luisa Masciullo; Rossella D'Alisa; Gabriella Brandolino; Cecilia Galli; Casimiro De Luca; Francesco Pecorini; Giovanni Battista Fonsi; Andrea Mingoli; Cristiana Franchi; Alessandra Oliva; Lucia Manganaro; Claudio Maria Mastroianni; Maria Grazia Piccioni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Vertical transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander M Kotlyar; Olga Grechukhina; Alice Chen; Shota Popkhadze; Alyssa Grimshaw; Oded Tal; Hugh S Taylor; Reshef Tal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Allotey; Elena Stallings; Mercedes Bonet; Magnus Yap; Shaunak Chatterjee; Tania Kew; Luke Debenham; Anna Clavé Llavall; Anushka Dixit; Dengyi Zhou; Rishab Balaji; Siang Ing Lee; Xiu Qiu; Mingyang Yuan; Dyuti Coomar; Jameela Sheikh; Heidi Lawson; Kehkashan Ansari; Madelon van Wely; Elizabeth van Leeuwen; Elena Kostova; Heinke Kunst; Asma Khalil; Simon Tiberi; Vanessa Brizuela; Nathalie Broutet; Edna Kara; Caron Rahn Kim; Anna Thorson; Olufemi T Oladapo; Lynne Mofenson; Javier Zamora; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.