Literature DB >> 32335742

The effect of posture on lumbar muscle morphometry from upright MRI.

Noor Shaikh1,2,3, Honglin Zhang4, Stephen H M Brown5, Jason R Shewchuk6, Zakariya Vawda6, Hanbing Zhou2,7, John Street2,7, David R Wilson2,4,7, Thomas R Oxland8,9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of upright, seated, and supine postures on lumbar muscle morphometry at multiple spinal levels and for multiple muscles.
METHODS: Six asymptomatic volunteers were imaged (0.5 T upright open MRI) in 7 postures (standing, standing holding 8 kg, standing 45° flexion, seated 45° flexion, seated upright, seated 45° extension, and supine), with scans at L3/L4, L4/L5, and L5/S1. Muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and muscle position with respect to the vertebral body centroid (radius and angle) were measured for the multifidus/erector spinae combined and psoas major muscles.
RESULTS: Posture significantly affected the multifidus/erector spinae CSA with decreasing CSA from straight postures (standing and supine) to seated and flexed postures (up to 19%). Psoas major CSA significantly varied with vertebral level with opposite trends due to posture at L3/L4 (increasing CSA, up to 36%) and L5/S1 (decreasing CSA, up to 40%) with sitting/flexion. For both muscle groups, radius and angle followed similar trends with decreasing radius (up to 5%) and increasing angle (up to 12%) with seated/flexed postures. CSA and lumbar lordosis had some correlation (multifidus/erector spinae L4/L5 and L5/S1, r = 0.37-0.45; PS L3/L4 left, r =  - 0.51). There was generally good repeatability (average ICC(3, 1): posture = 0.81, intra = 0.89, inter = 0.82).
CONCLUSION: Changes in multifidus/erector spinae muscle CSA likely represent muscles stretching between upright and seated/flexed postures. For the psoas major, the differential level effect suggests that changing three-dimensional muscle morphometry with flexion is not uniform along the muscle length. The muscle and spinal level-dependent effects of posture and spinal curvature correlation, including muscle CSA and position, highlight considering measured muscle morphometry from different postures in spine models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Lumbar muscle; MRI; Mechanics; Muscle morphometry; Posture; Spinal muscle; Spine; Upright MRI; Weight-bearing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335742     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-020-06409-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative identification and segmentation repeatability of thoracic spinal muscle morphology.

Authors:  Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; Jason R Shewchuk; Bedoor Al Omran; John Street; David Wilson; Majid Doroudi; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  Preliminary investigation of spinal level and postural effects on thoracic muscle morphology with upright open MRI.

Authors:  Anoosha Pai S; Honglin Zhang; John Street; David R Wilson; Stephen H M Brown; Thomas R Oxland
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2021-02-08

3.  3D orientation and kinematic characteristics of zygapophyseal joints while sitting.

Authors:  Bowen Kou; Yang Song; Ye Han; Zepei Zhang; Jun Miao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-04

4.  Synchronous imaging of pelvic geometry and muscle morphometry: a pilot study of pelvic retroversion using upright MRI.

Authors:  Noor Shaikh; Honglin Zhang; Stephen H M Brown; Hamza Lari; Oliver Lasry; John Street; David R Wilson; Thomas Oxland
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.