Literature DB >> 32335671

IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Correction of Bias Caused by Noncommutability of a Certified Reference Material Used in the Calibration Hierarchy of an End-User Measurement Procedure.

W Greg Miller1, Jeffrey Budd2, Neil Greenberg3, Cas Weykamp4, Harald Althaus5, Heinz Schimmel6, Mauro Panteghini7, Vincent Delatour8, Ferruccio Ceriotti9, Thomas Keller10, Douglas Hawkins11, Chris Burns12, Robert Rej13, Johanna E Camara14, Finlay MacKenzie15, Eline van der Hagen4, Hubert Vesper16.   

Abstract

Establishing metrological traceability to an assigned value of a matrix-based certified reference material (CRM) that has been validated to be commutable among available end-user measurement procedures (MPs) is central to producing equivalent results for the measurand in clinical samples (CSs) irrespective of the clinical laboratory MPs used. When a CRM is not commutable with CSs, the bias due to noncommutability will be propagated to the CS results causing incorrect metrological traceability to the CRM and nonequivalent CS results among different MPs. In a commutability assessment, a conclusion that a CRM is commutable or noncommutable for use with a specific MP is made when the difference in bias between the CRM and CSs meets or does not meet a criterion for that specific MP when compared to other MPs. A conclusion regarding commutability or noncommutability requires that the magnitude of the difference in bias observed in the commutability assessment remains unchanged over time. This conclusion requires the CRM to be stable and no substantive changes in the MPs. These conditions should be periodically reverified. If an available CRM is determined to be noncommutable for a specific MP, that CRM can be used in the calibration hierarchy for that MP when an appropriately validated MP-specific correction for the noncommutability bias is included. We describe with examples how a MP-specific correction and its uncertainty can be developed and applied in a calibration hierarchy to achieve metrological traceability of results for CSs to the CRM's assigned value. © American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  calibration; certified reference material; commutability; harmonization; standardization; traceability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335671      PMCID: PMC7551486          DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  22 in total

1.  Analytic bias of thyroid function tests: analysis of a College of American Pathologists fresh frozen serum pool by 3900 clinical laboratories.

Authors:  Bernard W Steele; Edward Wang; George G Klee; Linda M Thienpont; Steven J Soldin; Lori J Sokoll; William E Winter; Susan A Fuhrman; Ronald J Elin
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Why commutability matters.

Authors:  W Greg Miller; Gary L Myers; Robert Rej
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 3.  Traceability in laboratory medicine.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Linda M Thienpont
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Standardization of ceruloplasmin measurements is still an issue despite the availability of a common reference material.

Authors:  Ilenia Infusino; Cristina Valente; Alberto Dolci; Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 5.  Follicle stimulating hormone international standards and reference preparations for the calibration of immunoassays and bioassays.

Authors:  M P Rose
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1998-05-25       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine.

Authors:  Sverre Sandberg; Callum G Fraser; Andrea Rita Horvath; Rob Jansen; Graham Jones; Wytze Oosterhuis; Per Hyltoft Petersen; Heinz Schimmel; Ken Sikaris; Mauro Panteghini
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  State of Harmonization of 24 Serum Albumin Measurement Procedures and Implications for Medical Decisions.

Authors:  Lorin M Bachmann; Min Yu; James C Boyd; David E Bruns; W Greg Miller
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  Is the WHO 90:10 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) first international reference standard really 90% α1-antichymotrypsin-bound PSA and 10% free PSA?

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Steven Rosenwald; Jeremy Lyons; Debra J Elliott; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  IFCC Working Group Recommendations for Assessing Commutability Part 1: General Experimental Design.

Authors:  W Greg Miller; Heinz Schimmel; Robert Rej; Neil Greenberg; Ferruccio Ceriotti; Chris Burns; Jeffrey R Budd; Cas Weykamp; Vincent Delatour; Göran Nilsson; Finlay MacKenzie; Mauro Panteghini; Thomas Keller; Johanna E Camara; Ingrid Zegers; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Metrological Timelines in Traceability.

Authors:  Charles D Ehrlich; Stanley D Rasberry
Journal:  J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol       Date:  1998-02-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  EQA/PT scheme to improve the equivalence of enzymatic results between mutual recognition laboratories in Beijing.

Authors:  Qing Tong; Shunli Zhang; Chang Zuo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Development of Certified Reference Material for Amino Acids in Dried Blood Spots and Accuracy Assessment of Disc Sampling.

Authors:  Sangji Woo; Nordiana Rosli; Seohyun Choi; Ha-Jeong Kwon; Young Ahn Yoon; Sunhyun Ahn; Ji Youn Lee; Seon-Pyo Hong; Ji-Seon Jeong
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 8.008

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.