Literature DB >> 32335667

Progression of aortic stenosis and echocardiographic criteria for its severity.

Kalie Kebed1, Deyu Sun2, Karima Addetia1, Victor Mor-Avi1, Natasha Markuzon2, Roberto M Lang1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Guidelines-recommended criteria for identifying severe aortic stenosis (AS) are based on small, homogenous cohorts of patients, leading to potentially inconsistent or missed diagnosis. We used a large cohort of patients with varying degrees of AS to (i) characterize its progression; (ii) evaluate the influence of demographic and echocardiographic variables; and (iii) derive haemodynamically consistent cut-off values. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We identified 916 patients with mild to severe AS who had undergone >1 echocardiographic study (N = 2547). For each study, aortic valve area (AVA), peak transaortic velocity (Vmax), and mean pressure gradient (ΔP) were extracted. Annual rates of AVA change were determined by a linear mixed-effects model. To determine the prevalence of inconsistent diagnosis of severe AS, AVA was plotted against ΔP and Vmax, with quadrants defined using guidelines-recommended cut-offs. The rate of AVA change was -0.070 ± 0.003 cm2/year and was more rapid in men than women and in Whites than African Americans. AVA = 1 cm2 corresponded to ΔP = 32 mmHg and Vmax = 3.7 m/s, causing discrepancies in defining severe AS in 480 (19%) and 458 (18%) studies, respectively. Conversely, ΔP = 40 mmHg corresponded to AVA = 0.89 cm2 and Vmax = 4.0 m/s corresponded to AVA = 0.92 cm2, confirming the inconsistency of the guidelines. Notably, discrepancy rate was higher in 206 patients with low flow (SVi < 35 mL/m2): 40% vs. 16% in the remaining patients.
CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrated gender- and race-related differences in AS progression and underscored the need to refine the multiparametric criteria for diagnosis of severe AS to minimize internal inconsistencies, which are high with the current cut-offs and amplified in patients with low stroke volumes. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2020. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler echocardiography; valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335667     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating Medical Therapy for Calcific Aortic Stenosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Devraj Sukul; Marc R Dweck; Mahesh V Madhavan; Benoit J Arsenault; Megan Coylewright; W David Merryman; David E Newby; John Lewis; Frank E Harrell; Michael J Mack; Martin B Leon; Catherine M Otto; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The year in cardiovascular medicine 2020: valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Javier Bermejo; Andrea Postigo; Helmut Baumgartner
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  Moderate aortic stenosis: culprit or bystander?

Authors:  Varayini Pankayatselvan; Inbar Raber; David Playford; Simon Stewart; Geoff Strange; Jordan B Strom
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-01

4.  Counting the cost of premature mortality with progressively worse aortic stenosis in Australia: a clinical cohort study.

Authors:  Simon Stewart; Clifford Afoakwah; Yih-Kai Chan; Jordan B Strom; David Playford; Geoffrey A Strange
Journal:  Lancet Healthy Longev       Date:  2022-08-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.