Literature DB >> 32335474

The microclimate under dressings applied to intact weight-bearing skin: Infrared thermography studies.

Golan Amrani1, Lea Peko1, Oshrit Hoffer2, Zehava Ovadia-Blechman3, Amit Gefen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: When a patient is lying in a hospital bed (e.g. supine or prone), bodyweight forces distort soft tissues by compression, tension and shear, and may lead to the onset of pressure ulcers in those who are stationary and insensate, especially at their pelvic region. Altered localized microclimate conditions, particularly elevated skin temperatures leading to perspiration and resulting in skin moisture or wetness, are known to further increase the risk for pressure ulcers, which is already high in immobile patients.
METHODS: We have used infrared thermography to measure local skin temperatures at the buttocks of supine healthy subjects, to quantitatively determine, for the first time in the literature, how skin microclimate conditions associated with a weight-bearing Fowler's position are affected by application of dressings. Our present methodology has been applied to compare a polymeric membrane dressing versus placebo foam, with a no-dressing case used as reference.
FINDINGS: One hour of lying in a Fowler's position was already enough to cause considerable heat trapping (~3 °C rise) between the weight-bearing body and the support surface. Analyses of normalized local skin temperatures and entropy of the temperature distributions indicated that the polymeric membrane dressing material allowed better and more homogenous clearance of locally accumulated body-heat with respect to simple foam.
INTERPRETATION: Infrared thermography is suitable for characterizing skin microclimate conditions under different dressings, and, accordingly, is effective in developing and evaluating pressure ulcer prevention and treatment strategies - both of which require adequate skin microclimate.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heat trapping; Pressure injury; Pressure ulcer risk assessment; Prevention; Prophylactic dressings

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335474     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.104994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  6 in total

1.  The biomechanical efficacy of a dressing with a soft cellulose fluff core in prophylactic use.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; Maja Krämer; Maik Brehm; Sören Burckardt
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Protecting prone positioned patients from facial pressure ulcers using prophylactic dressings: A timely biomechanical analysis in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Lea Peko; Michelle Barakat-Johnson; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  The Effects of Skin Temperature Changes on the Integrity of Skin Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tiziana Mifsud; Chiara Modestini; Anabelle Mizzi; Owen Falzon; Kevin Cassar; Stephen Mizzi
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Effects of loading and prophylactic dressings on the sacral and heel skin: An exploratory cross-over trial.

Authors:  Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Annika Vogt; Tsenka Tomova-Simitchieva; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Our contemporary understanding of the aetiology of pressure ulcers/pressure injuries.

Authors:  Amit Gefen; David M Brienza; Janet Cuddigan; Emily Haesler; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  What makes a hydrogel-based dressing advantageous for the prevention of medical device-related pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Angela Grigatti; Amit Gefen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.315

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.