Simon Thomas Schäfer1, Tobias Wiederkehr1, Tobias Kammerer2, Alice-Christin Acevedo1, Katharina Feil3, Lars Kellert3, Klaus Görlinger4, Ludwig Christian Hinske1, Philipp Groene5. 1. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; Institute of Anaesthesiology, Heart and Diabetes Centre NRW, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany. 3. Department of Neurology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. 4. TEM Innovations, Munich, Germany. 5. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.groene@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Timely measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is challenging, though clinically important. We tested the hypotheses, that thromboelastometry is able to detect dabigatran and rivaroxaban and discriminates between dabigatran and rivaroxaban as representatives of the two groups of DOACs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a prospective-observational study: In-vitro dose-effect-curves for rivaroxaban and dabigatran were performed (n = 10). Ex-vivo: Patients with indication of DOAC treatment (stroke; dabigatran/rivaroxaban) were included (n = 21). Blood samples were analyzed before first intake, at first estimated peak level and at 24 h after first but before following intake and 3 h after 24 h-intake. Standard and modified thromboelastometric-assays, using low tissue factor concentrations (TFTEM) or ecarin (ECATEM) were used. Receiver-operating-characteristics-curve-analysis (ROC), regression-analysis and two-way-ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: In-vitro: TFTEM detected dabigatran and rivaroxaban (ROC_AUC: 0.99; sensitivity/specificity: 100%/98%) but could not discriminate. Dabigatran prolongs CTECATEM whereas rivaroxaban did not. Clotting Time (CT)-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM discriminated highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban even at very low concentrations (ROC_AUC:1.0). CTECATEM correlated with dabigatran spiked concentrations (r = 0.9985; p < 0.001) and CTTFTEM (r = 0.9363; p = 0.006) with rivaroxaban. Similarly results could be demonstrated with patient data: We confirmed the performance for the differentiation of CT-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM (sensitivity 100%/specificity 100%) at any time after first intake of either DOAC. CONCLUSION: The thromboelastometric tests TFTEM and ECATEM detect and differentiate rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Further investigations evaluate the other DOACs and the differentiation to phenprocoumon. However, results need to be confirmed in a larger study, and especially cut off values for differentiation need to be calculated from a larger sample size.
INTRODUCTION: Timely measurement of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is challenging, though clinically important. We tested the hypotheses, that thromboelastometry is able to detect dabigatran and rivaroxaban and discriminates between dabigatran and rivaroxaban as representatives of the two groups of DOACs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We conducted a prospective-observational study: In-vitro dose-effect-curves for rivaroxaban and dabigatran were performed (n = 10). Ex-vivo: Patients with indication of DOAC treatment (stroke; dabigatran/rivaroxaban) were included (n = 21). Blood samples were analyzed before first intake, at first estimated peak level and at 24 h after first but before following intake and 3 h after 24 h-intake. Standard and modified thromboelastometric-assays, using low tissue factor concentrations (TFTEM) or ecarin (ECATEM) were used. Receiver-operating-characteristics-curve-analysis (ROC), regression-analysis and two-way-ANOVA were performed. RESULTS: In-vitro: TFTEM detected dabigatran and rivaroxaban (ROC_AUC: 0.99; sensitivity/specificity: 100%/98%) but could not discriminate. Dabigatran prolongs CTECATEM whereas rivaroxaban did not. Clotting Time (CT)-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM discriminated highly sensitive (100%) and specific (100%) between dabigatran and rivaroxaban even at very low concentrations (ROC_AUC:1.0). CTECATEM correlated with dabigatran spiked concentrations (r = 0.9985; p < 0.001) and CTTFTEM (r = 0.9363; p = 0.006) with rivaroxaban. Similarly results could be demonstrated with patient data: We confirmed the performance for the differentiation of CT-ratio TFTEM/ECATEM (sensitivity 100%/specificity 100%) at any time after first intake of either DOAC. CONCLUSION: The thromboelastometric tests TFTEM and ECATEM detect and differentiate rivaroxaban and dabigatran. Further investigations evaluate the other DOACs and the differentiation to phenprocoumon. However, results need to be confirmed in a larger study, and especially cut off values for differentiation need to be calculated from a larger sample size.
Authors: Mirjam Bachler; Lars M Asmis; Jürgen Koscielny; Thomas Lang; Hartmuth Nowak; Patrick Paulus; Jens-Christian Schewe; Christian von Heymann; Dietmar Fries Journal: Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 1.061
Authors: Daniel Katz; Patrick Maher; Chloe Getrajdman; Joshua Hamburger; Shan Zhao; Jonathan Madek; Himani Bhatt; Matthew Levin; Klaus Görlinger Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.747