Literature DB >> 32335234

Simultaneous versus staged resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases: A population-based cost analysis in Ontario, Canada - Health economic evaluation.

Julian Wang1, Christopher Griffiths2, Marko Simunovic2, Sameer Parpia3, Chu-Shu Gu4, Amiram Gafni5, Leyo Ruo2, Julie Hallet6, Jessica Bogach6, Pablo E Serrano7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous compared to staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is considered safe. We aimed to determine their cost implications. STUDY
DESIGN: Population-based cohort was generated by linking administrative healthcare datasets in Ontario, Canada (2006-2014). Resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases within six months was considered synchronous. Cost analysis was performed from the perspective of a third-party payer. Median costs with range were estimated using the log-normal distribution of cost using t-test with a one-year time horizon.
RESULTS: Among patients undergoing staged resection (n = 678), the estimated median cost was $54,321 CAD (IQR 45,472 to 68,475) and $41,286 CAD (IQR 31,633 to 58,958) for those undergoing simultaneous resection (n = 390), median difference: $13,035 CAD (p < 0.001). Primary cost driver were all costs related to hospitalization for liver and colon resection, which was higher for the staged approach, median difference: $16,346 CAD (p < 0.001). This was mainly due to a longer median length of hospital stay in the staged vs. simultaneous group (11 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001 respectively), which was not attributable to differences in major postoperative complication rates (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.067 respectively). Other costs, including cost of chemotherapy within six months of surgery ($11,681 CAD vs. $8644 CAD, p = 0.074 respectively) and 90-day re-hospitalization cost ($2155 CAD vs. $2931 CAD, p = 0.454 respectively) were similar between groups.
CONCLUSION: Cost of staged resection of synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastases is significantly higher compared to the simultaneous approach, mostly driven by a longer length of hospital stay despite similar postoperative complication rates.
Copyright © 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Colorectal liver metastases; Cost analysis; Population-based study; Simultaneous resection; Synchronous metastases

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335234     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  3 in total

1.  Management of Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: An Inception Cohort Study (CoSMIC).

Authors:  Anthony K C Chan; James M Mason; Minas Baltatzis; Ajith K Siriwardena
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Development and validation of survival nomograms in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastases underwent simultaneous surgical treatment of primary and metastatic lesions.

Authors:  Xiao Guo; Yang Liu; Lu-Jia Liu; Jun Li; Lei Zhao; Xiang-Ren Jin; Wei Yan; Bai-Qiang Lin; Shang Shi; Zhi-Yong Li; Shuang Wang; Xin Wu; Hong-Ye Chen; Yang Shen; Yun-Wei Wei
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  The Value of Laparoscopic Simultaneous Colorectal and Hepatic Resection for Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Authors:  Jiamin Zhou; Longhai Feng; Xinxiang Li; Miao Wang; Yiming Zhao; Ning Zhang; Longrong Wang; Ti Zhang; Anrong Mao; Ye Xu; Lu Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.