Literature DB >> 32335217

Perceptual and Motor Effects of Muscle Co-activation in a Force Production Task.

Cristian Cuadra1, Wiktoria Wojnicz2, Ziga Kozinc3, Mark L Latash4.   

Abstract

We tested several predictions of the theory of motor control with spatial referent coordinates related to effects of muscle coactivation on force production and perception. In particular, we predicted that subjects would produce unintentional force increase by finger flexors and be unaware of this force increase. Healthy subjects performed steady force production task in isometric conditions with visual feedback on the force level. They coactivated muscles of the arm trying to keep the force constant in the absence of visual feedback. This led to a consistent force increase not perceived by the subjects as reflected by their verbal reports. In contrast, when asked to match the force with the contralateral hand, adequate force matching was observed. Using the "inverse piano" apparatus confirmed no change in the referent coordinate of the fingers and an increase in its apparent stiffness. The results confirm the earlier hypothesis on the reciprocal command being hierarchically higher than the coactivation command. The observations suggest that verbal reports and force matching use different neural mechanisms of force perception; the former are dominated by sense of effort, which reflects primarily the magnitude of the reciprocal command. There were only minor differences between the dominant and non-dominant hands, likely reflecting the faster unintentional drifts of control variables in the dominant hand.
Copyright © 2020 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  back-coupling; kinesthetic perception; performance drift; referent coordinate; sense of effort

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335217     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  On the origin of finger enslaving: control with referent coordinates and effects of visual feedback.

Authors:  Valters Abolins; Alex Stremoukhov; Caroline Walter; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Proprioceptive sensitivity to imposed finger deflections.

Authors:  Katie H Long; Kristine R McLellan; Maria Boyarinova; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reciprocal and coactivation commands at the level of individual motor units in an extrinsic finger flexor-extensor muscle pair.

Authors:  Shirin Madarshahian; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Production and Perception of Intentional and Unintentional Actions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Stability of Action and Kinesthetic Perception in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Joseph Ricotta; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 6.  Efference copy in kinesthetic perception: a copy of what is it?

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.