Literature DB >> 32335086

A Novel Perineal Nerve Block Approach for Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: An Anatomical Analysis-based Randomized Single-blind Controlled Trial.

Haifeng Wang1, Hengzhi Lin2, Biming He1, Xiaodan Guo3, Yi Zhou4, Peng Xi4, Zhen Liu3, Husheng Li2, Guangan Xiao2, Maoyu Wang2, Zhenkai Shi2, Yi Liu4, Xia Sheng2, Xu Gao2, Chuanliang Xu2, Yinghao Sun5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a novel perineal nerve block approach for transperineal prostate biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five adult male cadavers were dissected to delineate the superficial and deep branches of the perineal nerve. Afterwards, 90 out of 115 patients were selected and randomly assigned to receive periprostatic, periapical triangle, or branches of perineal nerve (BPN) block. The primary outcome was the maximal pain intensity associated with transperineal prostate biopsy, which was assessed by the 10-point visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes included the number of biopsy with visual analog scale of ≥4 in each biopsy procedure, and the incidences of complications.
RESULTS: On the horizontal line of the upper anal border, the locations of the superficial branch of perineal nerve on the left and right sides were 1.87 ± 0.05 cm and 1.86 ± 0.06 cm, respectively; and the deep branch were 2.15 ± 0.07 cm and 2.16 ± 0.06 cm, respectively, from the midline, and lied between the deep layer of superficial fascia and prostate capsule. The number of cases finally enrolled in data analysis in periprostatic block, periapical triangle block, and BPN block groups were 26, 27, and 30, respectively. The maximal pain intensities were 3.4 (3.1-3.7), 3.3 (3.0-3.6), and 1.8 (1.5-2.2) in the 3 groups, respectively, and the numbers of biopsy with the pain intensity of ≥4 were 4.0 (3.2-4.9), 4.2 (3.3-5.2), and 0.7 (0.1-1.2), respectively. There were 4, 3 and 4 cases developing hematuria, and 1, 1 and 2 burdened with urine retention after biopsy in the 3 groups, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Collectively, BPN block is a safe, effective and repeatable local anesthesia approach for transperineal prostate biopsy.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32335086     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.01.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

Review 1.  Developments in optimizing transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Emily Cheng; Meenakshi Davuluri; Patrick J Lewicki; Jim C Hu; Spyridon P Basourakos
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.808

2.  Establishment of an Individualized Predictive Model to Reduce the Core Number for Systematic Prostate Biopsy: A Dual Center Study Based on Stratification of the Disease Risk Score.

Authors:  Zeyu Chen; Min Qu; Xianqi Shen; Shaoqin Jiang; Wenhui Zhang; Jin Ji; Yan Wang; Jili Zhang; Zhenlin Chen; Lu Lin; Mengqiang Li; Cheng Wu; Xu Gao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.