INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of leptomeningeal collateral circulation in thrombectomy-treated patients remains unclear. We evaluated the construct validity of assessing leptomeningeal collateral circulation using a new regional perfusion CT source image-based approach, the Perfusion Acquisition for THrombectomy Scale (PATHS). We also compared the prognostic value of PATHS with a further 6 scales based on various techniques: CT-angiography, perfusion CT, and digital subtraction angiography. Additionally, we studied the relationship between the scores for the different scales. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients with stroke and M1/terminal carotid occlusion treated with thrombectomy in our center. Leptomeningeal collateral circulation was prospectively evaluated using 7 scales: Tan and Miteff (CT Angiography); Calleja, Cao, American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology, and PATHS (perfusion); and Christoforidis (Digital Subtraction Angiography). Correlations were studied using the Spearman method. RESULTS: The study population comprised 108 patients. All scales predicted the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months (P ≤ .02) and all but 1 (Christoforidis) correlated with 24-hour brain infarct volume (P ≤ .02). These correlations were higher with PATHS (rho = -0.47, P < .001 for 3-month modified Rankin Scale; rho = -0.35, P < .001 for follow-up infarct volume). The multivariate analysis showed PATHS to be an independent predictor of modified Rankin Scale at 3 months less than equal to 2. A crosscorrelation analysis revealed a better correlation between scales that used the same techniques. CONCLUSIONS: PATHS can be used to assess leptomeningeal collateral circulation. PATHS had better prognostic value than other scales; therefore, it might be considered for assessment of leptomeningeal collateral circulation in candidates for thrombectomy. The moderate correlation between scales suggests that scores are not interchangeable.
INTRODUCTION: The prognostic value of leptomeningeal collateral circulation in thrombectomy-treated patients remains unclear. We evaluated the construct validity of assessing leptomeningeal collateral circulation using a new regional perfusion CT source image-based approach, the Perfusion Acquisition for THrombectomy Scale (PATHS). We also compared the prognostic value of PATHS with a further 6 scales based on various techniques: CT-angiography, perfusion CT, and digital subtraction angiography. Additionally, we studied the relationship between the scores for the different scales. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients with stroke and M1/terminal carotid occlusion treated with thrombectomy in our center. Leptomeningeal collateral circulation was prospectively evaluated using 7 scales: Tan and Miteff (CT Angiography); Calleja, Cao, American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology, and PATHS (perfusion); and Christoforidis (Digital Subtraction Angiography). Correlations were studied using the Spearman method. RESULTS: The study population comprised 108 patients. All scales predicted the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months (P ≤ .02) and all but 1 (Christoforidis) correlated with 24-hour brain infarct volume (P ≤ .02). These correlations were higher with PATHS (rho = -0.47, P < .001 for 3-month modified Rankin Scale; rho = -0.35, P < .001 for follow-up infarct volume). The multivariate analysis showed PATHS to be an independent predictor of modified Rankin Scale at 3 months less than equal to 2. A crosscorrelation analysis revealed a better correlation between scales that used the same techniques. CONCLUSIONS: PATHS can be used to assess leptomeningeal collateral circulation. PATHS had better prognostic value than other scales; therefore, it might be considered for assessment of leptomeningeal collateral circulation in candidates for thrombectomy. The moderate correlation between scales suggests that scores are not interchangeable.