Literature DB >> 32334039

Regulating human safety: How dose selection in toxicity studies impacts human health hazard assessment and subsequent risk management options.

Marjolijn Woutersen1, Andre Muller2, Marja E J Pronk2, Nicole H P Cnubben2, Betty C Hakkert2.   

Abstract

In the EU, one of the key determinants in the regulation and management of substances to ensure adequate protection of human health is the outcome of toxicity studies. These studies should therefore be performed in a way that the data generated are adequate to fulfil all regulatory requirements. However, in recent years, an increasing number of toxicity studies use dose levels that induce only slight, or even no toxicity, while the top dose lies well below the limit dose of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. The results of these studies have limited value for the hazard and subsequent risk assessment and risk management of substances. This paper shows why conducting toxicity studies with too low doses has severe consequences for among others classification and labelling, identification of endocrine disruptors, health impact assessment, and incident management. With this paper we aim to raise awareness on this issue and want to stress the importance of the use of sufficiently high dosing in toxicity studies. Given their central role in toxicity testing, it is therefore key to adapt where necessary the descriptions in OECD test guidelines and guidance documents on requirements for dose level setting, to make sure they are as explicit and unambiguous as possible.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Human health; Low dosing; Regulatory impact; Toxicity studies

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32334039     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  Opportunities and challenges related to saturation of toxicokinetic processes: Implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  Yu-Mei Tan; Hugh A Barton; Alan Boobis; Rachel Brunner; Harvey Clewell; Rhian Cope; Jeffrey Dawson; Jeanne Domoradzki; Peter Egeghy; Pankaj Gulati; Brandall Ingle; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kelly Lowe; Anna Lowit; Elizabeth Mendez; David Miller; Jeffrey Minucci; James Nguyen; Alicia Paini; Monique Perron; Katherine Phillips; Hua Qian; Tharacad Ramanarayanan; Fiona Sewell; Philip Villanueva; John Wambaugh; Michelle Embry
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Principles of dose-setting in toxicology studies: the importance of kinetics for ensuring human safety.

Authors:  C J Borgert; C Fuentes; L D Burgoon
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 3.  Recommendations on dose level selection for repeat dose toxicity studies.

Authors:  Fiona Sewell; Marco Corvaro; Amanda Andrus; Jonathan Burke; George Daston; Bryan Delaney; Jeanne Domoradzki; Carole Forlini; Maia Louise Green; Thomas Hofmann; Sven Jäckel; Moung Sook Lee; Michael Temerowski; Paul Whalley; Richard Lewis
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.168

4.  Challenges in Predicting the Change in the Cumulative Exposure of New Tobacco and Related Products Based on Emissions and Toxicity Dose-Response Data.

Authors:  Yvonne C M Staal; Wieneke Bil; Bas G H Bokkers; Lya G Soeteman-Hernández; W Edryd Stephens; Reinskje Talhout
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  A novel approach to calculating the kinetically derived maximum dose.

Authors:  Lyle D Burgoon; Claudio Fuentes; Christopher J Borgert
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.