Literature DB >> 32333839

COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths.

David A Leon1, Vladimir M Shkolnikov2, Liam Smeeth3, Per Magnus4, Markéta Pechholdová5, Christopher I Jarvis3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32333839      PMCID: PMC7176374          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30933-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
The first-line epidemiological response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) requires estimation of key parameters, including case fatality risk, and reproduction number, to monitor and predict the probable course of the pandemic. The challenge for public health scientists is that these data are partly a function of testing coverage. The number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 is problematic because the criteria for defining a death almost certainly depends on whether the death occurs in somebody who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Furthermore, an unknown fraction of the cases classified as COVID-19 deaths had underlying health conditions and were probably already at an increased risk of death. Although some countries tend to attribute to COVID-19 most deaths of people who had the virus, others might tend to register other causes of death in the presence of major chronic diseases, even if the deceased person had COVID-19. As the pandemic progresses, consistent measurement of its scale, across time and space, should be a priority. Objective and comparable data are crucial to determine the effectiveness of different national strategies used to mitigate and suppress, and thus to better prepare for the probable continuation of, the epidemic over the next year or more. For the reasons outlined above, the metrics on incidence and fatality have shortcomings that make such comparisons problematic. Weekly excess deaths could provide the most objective and comparable way of assessing the scale of the pandemic and formulating lessons to be learned. This measure can be constructed by comparing the observed weekly deaths throughout 2020 to values expected from the experience of previous non-pandemic years. This approach allows for the assessment of the total mortality effects of the pandemic in different places. Crucially, the counts would be of deaths by all causes combined, thus side-stepping issues of what is or is not a death attributable to COVID-19. Unfortunately, most countries do not publish such statistics, and those countries that do typically do, do so with considerable delay. We therefore urge all national authorities who can collate counts of weekly deaths to expedite the publication of these data and place them in the public domain. The dissemination of this information should be done within 3–4 weeks of the period of observation. At a minimum, tabulations by sex and 5-year age groups are essential. Where not already in the public domain, countries should also release the equivalent weekly data for every calendar year from 2010, for calculation of excess deaths in 2020.
  60 in total

Review 1.  Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Rituparna De; Shanta Dutta
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Infodemiological study on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on increased headache incidences at the world level.

Authors:  Cristiana Tudor; Robert Sova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  COVID-19 and Overall Mortality Inequities in the Surge in Death Rates by Zip Code Characteristics: Massachusetts, January 1 to May 19, 2020.

Authors:  Nancy Krieger; Pamela D Waterman; Jarvis T Chen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infectivity by Viral Load, S Gene Variants and Demographic Factors, and the Utility of Lateral Flow Devices to Prevent Transmission.

Authors:  Lennard Y W Lee; Stefan Rozmanowski; Matthew Pang; Andre Charlett; Charlotte Anderson; Gareth J Hughes; Matthew Barnard; Leon Peto; Richard Vipond; Alex Sienkiewicz; Susan Hopkins; John Bell; Derrick W Crook; Nick Gent; A Sarah Walker; Tim E A Peto; David W Eyre
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Excess deaths reveal the true spatial, temporal, and demographic impact of COVID-19 on mortality in Ecuador.

Authors:  Leticia Cuéllar; Irene Torres; Ethan Romero-Severson; Riya Mahesh; Nathaniel Ortega; Sarah Pungitore; Nicolas Hengartner; Ruian Ke
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Different approaches to quantify years of life lost from COVID-19.

Authors:  Tamás Ferenci
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Excess mortality among Latino people in California during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Alicia R Riley; Yea-Hung Chen; Ellicott C Matthay; M Maria Glymour; Jacqueline M Torres; Alicia Fernandez; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-07-02

8.  Assessing the Country-Level Excess All-Cause Mortality and the Impacts of Air Pollution and Human Activity during the COVID-19 Epidemic.

Authors:  Yuan Meng; Man Sing Wong; Hanfa Xing; Mei-Po Kwan; Rui Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  An Analysis of Changes in Emergency Department Visits After a State Declaration During the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Bjorn C Westgard; Matthew W Morgan; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; Lauren O Erickson; Michael D Zwank
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  Local mortality estimates during the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.

Authors:  Augusto Cerqua; Roberta Di Stefano; Marco Letta; Sara Miccoli
Journal:  J Popul Econ       Date:  2021-06-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.