| Literature DB >> 32333749 |
Baojun Yuan1, Xiaoting Wen2, Liubing Li2, Yongzhe Li2, Chao Li1, Baolin Li1, Wei Yuan3, Liufu Cui3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have demonstrated the important role of genetic predisposition in coal workers' pneumoconiosis (CWP) in addition to environmental factors. The pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis disease is related to telomere activity. We performed this study to assess the association between genetic variants of telomere-related genes and the risk of CWP. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 652 CWP Chinese Han patients and 648 dust-exposed controls in this case-control design study, genotyping 8 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) including TERT (rs2736100), TERC (rs10936599 and rs12696304), and NAF1 (rs7675998, rs3822304, rs12331717, rs936562 and rs4691896) using the Sequenom MassARRAY system. RESULTS We identified a significant allele association between NAF1 rs4691896 and CWP by comparing patients with controls (22.0% vs. 13.0%, odds ratio [OR]: 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-2.33, Pc=1.14×10⁻⁸). The genotype frequency of rs4691896 differed significantly between the patients and controls (Pc=1.49×10⁻⁸). In addition, rs4691896 was correlated with CWP in an additive genetic model (OR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58-2.44, Pc=8.96×10⁻⁹) and a dominant model (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.70-2.73, Pc=2.39×10⁻⁹). CONCLUSIONS Our study for the first time demonstrates an association between a telomere-related gene (NAF1) and CWP in a Chinese Han population, and provides valuable insight to further understand the possible pathogenetic mechanism of fibrosis in CWP.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32333749 PMCID: PMC7197226 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.918709
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
HWE test of 8 SNPs.
| Gene | SNP | Minor allele/major allele | Position | Function | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs10936599 | C/T | Chr3: 169774313 | 9.3 kB upstream of TERC | 0.52 | NS | |
| rs12696304 | C/G | Chr3: 169763483 | 1.5 kB downstream of TERC | 0.85 | NS | |
| rs2736100 | C/A | Chr5: 1286401 | Intron variant | 0.93 | NS | |
| rs7675998 | A/G | Chr4: 163086668 | 80 kB downstream of TERC | 0.89 | NS | |
| rs3822304 | G/C | Chr4: 163166899 | Upstream variant 2 kB, UTR variant 5 prime | >0.99 | NS | |
| rs12331717 | T/C | Chr4: 163166907 | Upstream variant 2 kB, UTR variant 5 prime | 0.19 | NS | |
| rs936562 | A/T | Chr4: 163166802 | UTR variant 5 prime | 0.72 | NS | |
| rs4691896 | T/C | Chr4: 163164273 | Missense variant, exon variant | >0.99 | NS |
HWE – Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; SNPs – single-nucleotide polymorphisms; Pc – p value corrected by Bonferroni method; NS – not significant.
Allele distribution of case-control association analysis.
| Gene | SNP | Minor allele/ major allele | CWP group, n (%) | Exposed control group, n (%) | OR (95%CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minor allele | Major allele | Minor allele | Major allele | ||||||
| rs10936599 | C/T | 579 (44.7%) | 715 (55.3%) | 576 (45.1%) | 702 (54.9%) | 0.99 (0.85–1.15) | 0.89 | NS | |
| rs12696304 | C/G | 412 (31.7%) | 886 (68.3%) | 395 (30.8%) | 887 (69.2%) | 1.04 (0.88–1.23) | 0.62 | NS | |
| rs2736100 | C/A | 496 (38.4%) | 794 (61.6%) | 534 (42.7%) | 718 (57.3%) | 0.84 (0.72–0.98) | 0.04 | NS | |
| rs7675998 | A/G | 234 (18.0%) | 1064 (82.05) | 213 (16.5%) | 1077 (83.5%) | 1.11 (0.91–1.36) | 0.31 | NS | |
| rs3822304 | G/C | 43 (3.3%) | 1259 (96.7%) | 22 (1.7%) | 1264 (98.2%) | 1.96 (1.17–3.30) | 0.01 | NS | |
| rs12331717 | T/C | 64 (4.9%) | 1234 (95.1%) | 63 (4.9%) | 1233 (95.1%) | 1.02 (0.71–1.45) | 0.94 | NS | |
| rs936562 | A/T | 287 (22.2%) | 1007 (77.8%) | 273 (21.3%) | 1007 (78.7%) | 1.05 (0.87–1.27) | 0.60 | NS | |
| rs4691896 | T/C | 287 (22.0%) | 1017 (78.0%) | 168 (13.0%) | 1126 (87.0%) | 1.89 (1.54–2.33) | 1.43×10−9 | 1.14×10−8 | |
SNP – single-nucleotide polymorphism; CWP – coal workers’ pneumoconiosis; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; Pc – p value corrected by Bonferroni method; NS – not significant.
Genotype distribution of candidate genes in CWP cases and dust-exposed controls.
| Gene | SNP | Minor allele/ major allele | CWP group, n (%) | Exposed control group, n (%) | χ2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AA | AB | BB | AA | AB | BB | ||||||
| rs10936599 | C/T | 137 (21.2%) | 305 (47.1%) | 205 (31.7%) | 134 (21.0%) | 308 (48.2%) | 197 (30.8%) | 0.16 | 0.92 | NS | |
| rs12696304 | C/G | 74 (11.4%) | 264 (40.7%) | 311 (47.9%) | 62 (9.7%) | 271 (42.3%) | 308 (48.0%) | 1.12 | 0.57 | NS | |
| rs2736100 | A/C | 105 (16.3%) | 286 (44.3%) | 254 (39.4%) | 113 (18.1%) | 308 (49.2%) | 205 (32.7%) | 6.06 | 0.05 | NS | |
| rs7675998 | A/G | 14 (2.2%) | 206 (31.7%) | 429 (66.1%) | 18 (2.8%) | 177 (27.4%) | 450 (69.8%) | 3.19 | 0.20 | NS | |
| rs3822304 | C/G | 1 (0.2%) | 41 (6.2%) | 609 (93.5%) | 0 (0%) | 22 (3.4%) | 621 (96.6%) | 6.80 | 0.03 | NS | |
| rs12331717 | C/T | 4 (0.6%) | 56 (8.6%) | 589 (90.8%) | 3 (0.5%) | 57 (8.8%) | 588 (90.7%) | 0.15 | 0.93 | NS | |
| rs936562 | A/T | 23 (3.6%) | 241 (37.2%) | 383 (59.2%) | 27 (4.2%) | 219 (34.2%) | 394 (61.6%) | 1.49 | 0.48 | NS | |
| rs4691896 | C/T | 21 (3.2%) | 245 (37.6%) | 386 (59.2%) | 11 (1.7%) | 146 (22.65) | 490 (75.7%) | 40.52 | 1.86×10−9 | 1.49×10−8 | |
CWP – coal workers’ pneumoconiosis; SNP – single-nucleotide polymorphism; Pc – p value corrected by Bonferroni method.
Analysis of candidate SNPs based on 3 genetic models with logistic regression analysis.
| Gene | SNP | Additive model | Dominant model | Recessive model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||||||||
| rs10936599 | 0.99 (0.85–1.15) | 0.87 | NS | 0.96 (0.76–1.22) | 0.74 | NS | 1.01 (0.77–1.32) | 0.93 | NS | |
| rs12696304 | 1.04 (0.89–1.23) | 0.62 | NS | 1.01 (0.81–1.25) | 0.96 | NS | 1.20 (0.84–1.72) | 0.31 | NS | |
| rs2736100 | 0.84 (0.72–0.99) | 0.03 | NS | 0.75 (0.60–0.94) | 0.01 | NS | 0.88 (0.66–1.18) | 0.40 | NS | |
| rs7675998 | 1.12 (0.91–1.37) | 0.30 | NS | 1.18 (0.94–1.50) | 0.16 | NS | 0.77 (0.38–1.56) | 0.46 | NS | |
| rs3822304 | 1.96 (1.16–3.30) | 0.01 | NS | 1.95 (1.15–3.30) | 0.01 | NS | NA | 1.00 | NS | |
| rs12331717 | 1.01 (0.72–1.43) | 0.94 | NS | 1.00 (0.69–1.45) | 0.99 | NS | 1.33 (0.30–5.98) | 0.71 | NS | |
| rs936562 | 1.05 (0.87–1.28) | 0.59 | NS | 1.10 (0.88–1.38) | 0.39 | NS | 0.84 (0.48–1.48) | 0.54 | NS | |
| rs4691896 | 1.96 (1.58–2.44) | 1.12×10−9 | 8.96×10−9 | 2.15 (1.70–2.73) | 2.99×10−10 | 2.39×10−9 | 1.92 (0.92–4.02) | 0.82 | NS | |
SNPs – single-nucleotide polymorphisms; OR – odds ratio; CI – confidence interval; Pc – p value corrected by Bonferroni method; NS – not significant.
Figure 1D’ values map of linkage disequilibrium analysis of NAF1 gene.
Figure 2r2 values map of linkage disequilibrium analysis of NAF1 gene.