Zachary A Seymour1,2, Daniel A Hamstra1,2, Stephanie Daignault-Newton3, Walter Bosch4, Jeffery Michalski4, Hiram A Gay4, Michael Pinkawa5. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Dearborn, MI, USA. 2. Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology and School of Medicine, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA. 5. Department of Radiotherapy, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term bowel-associated quality of life (QOL) in men after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer with and without the use of rectal hydrogel spacer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients' QOL was examined using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and mean changes from baseline in EPIC domains were evaluated. A total of 215 patients from a randomised multi-institutional trial of RT, with or without hydrogel spacer, with a QOL endpoint were pooled with 165 non-randomised patients from a single institution with prospective QOL collection in patients with or without hydrogel spacer. The proportions of men with minimally important differences (MIDs) relative to pre-treatment baseline in the bowel domain were tested using repeated measure logistic models with a pre-specified threshold for clinically significant declines (≥5 equivalent to MIDx1 and ≥10 equivalent to MIDx2). RESULTS:A total of 380 men were evaluated (64% with spacer and 36% without) with QOL data being available for 199 men with >24 months of follow-up [median (range) 39.5 (31-71.4) months]. Treatment with spacer was associated with less decline in average long-term bowel QOL (89.4 for control and 94.7 for spacer) with differences at >24 months meeting the threshold of a MID difference between cohorts (bowel score difference from baseline: control = -5.1, spacer = 0.3, difference = -5.4; P < 0.001). When evaluated over time men without spacer were more likely to have MIDx1 (5 points) declines in bowel QOL (P = 0.01). At long-term follow-up MIDx1 was 36% without spacer vs 14% with spacer (P <0.001; odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-6.9) while MIDx2 was seen in 19% vs 6% (P = 0.008; OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.1). The use of spacer was associated with less urgency with bowel movements (P = 0.002) and fewer loose stools (P = 0.009), as well as less bother with urgency (P = 0.007) and frequency of bowel movements (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of QOL after prostate RT with up to 5 years of follow-up, use of a rectal spacer was associated with preservation of bowel QOL. This QOL benefit was preserved with long-term follow-up.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term bowel-associated quality of life (QOL) in men after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer with and without the use of rectal hydrogel spacer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients' QOL was examined using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and mean changes from baseline in EPIC domains were evaluated. A total of 215 patients from a randomised multi-institutional trial of RT, with or without hydrogel spacer, with a QOL endpoint were pooled with 165 non-randomised patients from a single institution with prospective QOL collection in patients with or without hydrogel spacer. The proportions of men with minimally important differences (MIDs) relative to pre-treatment baseline in the bowel domain were tested using repeated measure logistic models with a pre-specified threshold for clinically significant declines (≥5 equivalent to MIDx1 and ≥10 equivalent to MIDx2). RESULTS: A total of 380 men were evaluated (64% with spacer and 36% without) with QOL data being available for 199 men with >24 months of follow-up [median (range) 39.5 (31-71.4) months]. Treatment with spacer was associated with less decline in average long-term bowel QOL (89.4 for control and 94.7 for spacer) with differences at >24 months meeting the threshold of a MID difference between cohorts (bowel score difference from baseline: control = -5.1, spacer = 0.3, difference = -5.4; P < 0.001). When evaluated over time men without spacer were more likely to have MIDx1 (5 points) declines in bowel QOL (P = 0.01). At long-term follow-up MIDx1 was 36% without spacer vs 14% with spacer (P <0.001; odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-6.9) while MIDx2 was seen in 19% vs 6% (P = 0.008; OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.1). The use of spacer was associated with less urgency with bowel movements (P = 0.002) and fewer loose stools (P = 0.009), as well as less bother with urgency (P = 0.007) and frequency of bowel movements (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of QOL after prostate RT with up to 5 years of follow-up, use of a rectal spacer was associated with preservation of bowel QOL. This QOL benefit was preserved with long-term follow-up.
Authors: Randall J Brenneman; S Murty Goddu; Neal Andruska; Amit Roy; Walter R Bosch; Benjamin Fischer-Valuck; Jason A Efstathiou; Hiram A Gay; Jeff M Michalski; Brian C Baumann Journal: Pract Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-10-22