Literature DB >> 32333687

Rethinking patient involvement in healthcare priority setting.

Lars Sandman1, Bjorn Hofmann2, Greg Bognar3.   

Abstract

With healthcare systems under pressure from scarcity of resources and ever-increasing demand for services, difficult priority setting choices need to be made. At the same time, increased attention to patient involvement in a wide range of settings has given rise to the idea that those who are eventually affected by priority setting decisions should have a say in those decisions. In this paper, we investigate arguments for the inclusion of patient representatives in priority setting bodies at the policy level. We find that the standard justifications for patient representation, such as to achieve patient-relevant decisions, empowerment of patients, securing legitimacy of decisions, and the analogy with democracy, all fall short of supporting patient representation in this context. We conclude by briefly outlining an alternative proposal for patient participation that involves patient consultants.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deliberative democracy; empowerment; legitimacy; patient involvement; priority setting; rationing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32333687     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  1 in total

1.  Public legitimacy of healthcare resource allocation committees: lessons learned from assessing an Israeli case study.

Authors:  Yael Assor; Dan Greenberg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 2.908

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.