Literature DB >> 32333109

COVID-19 outbreak situation and its psychological impact among surgeons in training in France.

Maher Abdessater1, Morgan Rouprêt2, Vincent Misrai3, Ugo Pinar1, Xavier Matillon4, Bastien Gondran-Tellier5, Lucas Freton6, Maxime Vallée7, Inès Dominique8, Margaux Felber1, Zine-Eddine Khene6, Edouard Fortier9, François Lannes5, Clément Michiels10, Tristan Grevez11, Nicolas Szabla12, Florian Bardet13, Kevin Kaulanjan14, Emilien Seizilles de Mazancourt4, Guillaume Ploussard15, Benjamin Pradere11,16.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32333109      PMCID: PMC7181962          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03207-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, The COVID-19 outbreak is a challenge for health care workers (HCW). Young surgeons have switched immediately their daily practice into eclectic tasks (e.g., nursing patients in ICU, examining COVID patients…). These individuals represent one of the most at-risk population to become infected and potentially COVID-19 spillers. Only 2 weeks after the beginning of COVID-19 lockdown, a self-administered questionnaire was e-mailed to the members of the French Association of Urologists in Training (AFUF), who have been routinely evaluated concerning their stress [1, 2]. In less than 72 h, 275 (59.6%) members replied to the questionnaire (see Table 1). Overall 76.7% had COVID-19 patients in their department, 61.5% judged themselves unable to treat their symptoms and 75.3% did not receive any updated guidelines on respiratory tract infection treatment. Despite all the widespread recommendations given by the national authorities, only 43.3% felt to have sufficient personal protective equipment (PPE). According to this condition, 92% of the participants reported to be stressed, with a medium-to-high level of stress in 56.5% of the cases. Moreover, more than 60% of responders noted that this health crisis was impacting the quality of their work.
Table 1

Responders characteristics

N = 275
Age in years, mean (SD)29.5 (0.47)
Female gender, n (%)90 (32.7)
Medical history, n (%)
 None244 (88.7)
 Respiratory20 (7.3)
 Other11 (4)
Psychiatry history, n (%)3 (1.1)
Smoker, n (%)54 (19.6)
Experience, n (%)
 1st year-resident21 (7.6)
 2nd year-resident33 (12)
 3rd year-resident30 (10.9)
 4th year-resident31 (11.3)
 5th year-resident41 (14.9)
 Senior90 (32.7)
 Science research29 (10.6)
Presence of Covid-19 patients, n (%)
 In the same building253 (92)
 In the same department211 (76.7)
Sufficient protection material, n (%)119 (43.3)
COVID-19 knowledge, n (%)
 Ability to treat COVID-19106 (38.6)
 Updated on COVID-19200 (72.7)
 Updated on URTI68 (24.7)
COVID-19 negative impact, n (%)
 On quality work (none to low)109 (39.6)
 On quality work (medium to high)166 (60.4)
 On urological training (none to low)46 (16.7)
 On urological training (medium to high)229 (83.3)
 Added level of stress (none to low)120 (43.6)
 Added level of stress (medium to high)155 (56.5)
 New psychiatric treatment initiated2 (0.7)

URTI Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

Responders characteristics URTI Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Importantly, the increase of stress was significantly more frequent for those who were in a high epidemic region, when COVID-19 patients were in their department and when they already had a personal past medical history of respiratory disease. The pandemic was more likely to have a negative impact on the quality of work for the most experienced urologists in training and when COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in their own urology department. Moreover, 83.3% of the responders judged that the COVID crisis had a negative impact on their urological training, knowing that overall satisfaction with urology training in Europe is low [3], this finding has an additional psychological burden, since “being well trained” was a strong protective factor against burnout [2]. Several options could help mitigating the negative effects of the current situation: webinar as well as e-learnings including practical surgical videos [4, 5], could have the potential to create a supportive educational environment [6]. Updates on COVID-19 and guidelines on upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) should also be promoted by our institutions through webinar sessions, or even on social media [7]. Young urologists expressed that the crisis had an important impact on their work quality. This might be explained by the fear driven by unusual medical responsibilities far from surgical considerations, and far from their general medicine training. Hence, it is important to implement medical and psychological reinforcement in every urological team who is involved in the management of COVID-19 patients. During the crisis, it is important to keep in mind that young urologists in high epidemic regions require a particular attention. COVID-19 crisis seems to be a major stressor for urologists in training and could lead to poorer caregiver mental health. Managing the psychosocial well-being during this time appears to be of utmost importance not only for coronavirus but also in the perspective of future similar pandemic crisis.
  5 in total

1.  Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Burak Arslan; Serkan Gönültaş; Ersin Gökmen; Oktay Özman; Özkan Onuk; Gökhan Yazıcı; Taha Göv; Enver Özdemir
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Current status of urology surgical training in Europe: an ESRU-ESU-ESUT collaborative study.

Authors:  Diego M Carrion; Moises E Rodriguez-Socarrás; Guglielmo Mantica; Francesco Esperto; Angelika Cebulla; Diederick Duijvesz; Giulio Patruno; Juan L Vásquez; Domenico Veneziano; Jesús Díez-Sebastian; Ali S Gozen; Joan Palou; Juan Gómez Rivas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Prevalence of and Predictive Factors for Burnout Among French Urologists in Training.

Authors:  Jérôme Gas; Stéphane Bart; Philippe Michel; Benoit Peyronnet; Sébastien Bergerat; Jonathan Olivier; Dimitri Gambachidze; William Akakpo; Cedric Lebacle; Mathilde Nedelec; Paul Panayotopoulos; Maximilien Baron; Emmanuel Perrot; Bastien Gondran-Tellier; Anthony Manuguerra; Inès Dominique; Xavier Matillon; Benjamin Pradere
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2019-01-05       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Do prostate cancer-related mobile phone apps have a role in contemporary prostate cancer management? A systematic review by EAU young academic urologists (YAU) urotechnology group.

Authors:  Enakshee Jamnadass; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Domenico Veneziano; Theodoros Tokas; Juan Gomez Rivas; Giovanni Cacciamani; Bhaskar Somani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Non-technical skills: a review of training and evaluation in urology.

Authors:  Cora Griffin; Abdullatif Aydın; Oliver Brunckhorst; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  COVID19: the response of the urologist.

Authors:  Damien Bolton
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Psychological sequelae within different populations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review of extant evidence.

Authors:  Xin Jie Jordon Tng; Qian Hui Chew; Kang Sim
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.331

3.  Phase 2 of the Coronavirus Pandemic in Urology: Ramping Up Surgical Caseload and Resident Training while COVID-19 Infections Decrease.

Authors:  Hendrik Borgmann; Katharina Boehm; Maximilian Peter Brandt; Mohammed M Kamal; Rene Mager; Thomas Höfner; Igor Tsaur; Axel Haferkamp
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Hospital workforce mental reaction to the pandemic in a low COVID-19 burden setting: a cross-sectional clinical study.

Authors:  Panagiotis Alexopoulos; Dimitrios Roukas; Apostolos Efkarpidis; Georgia Konstantopoulou; Rigas Soldatos; Katerina Karaivazoglou; Evagellia Kontogianni; Konstantinos Assimakopoulos; Theodoros Iliou; Polychronis Εconomou; Philippos Gourzis; Antonios Politis
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 5.  The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urology Residents: a Narrative Review.

Authors:  Johnathan A Khusid; Mahyar Kashani; Lauren E Fink; Corey S Weinstein; Mantu Gupta
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  The Mental Well-Being of Health Care Workers during the Peak of the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Nationwide Study in Poland.

Authors:  Mateusz Babicki; Ilona Szewczykowska; Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  COVID19 pandemic impacts on anxiety of French urologist in training: Outcomes from a national survey.

Authors:  M Abdessater; M Rouprêt; V Misrai; X Matillon; B Gondran-Tellier; L Freton; M Vallée; I Dominique; M Felber; Z-E Khene; E Fortier; F Lannes; C Michiels; T Grevez; N Szabla; J Boustany; F Bardet; K Kaulanjan; E Seizilles de Mazancourt; G Ploussard; U Pinar; B Pradere
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 0.915

8.  Prospective and observational study of COVID-19's impact on mental health and training of young surgeons in France.

Authors:  Maxime Vallée; Stessy Kutchukian; Benjamin Pradère; Emmanuelle Verdier; Ève Durbant; Dharmesh Ramlugun; Ilan Weizman; Rani Kassir; Antoine Cayeux; Océane Pécheux; Clément Baumgarten; Alexandra Hauguel; Agnès Paasche; Taha Mouhib; Jean Meyblum; Louis Dagneaux; Xavier Matillon; Anthony Levy-Bohbot; Sylvain Gautier; Gabriel Saiydoun
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  The mental health impact of the covid-19 pandemic on healthcare workers, and interventions to help them: A rapid systematic review.

Authors:  Ashley Elizabeth Muller; Elisabet Vivianne Hafstad; Jan Peter William Himmels; Geir Smedslund; Signe Flottorp; Synne Øien Stensland; Stijn Stroobants; Stijn Van de Velde; Gunn Elisabeth Vist
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.225

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.