| Literature DB >> 32332902 |
André Luiz Gollo1, Valcineide O A Tanobe2, Gilberto Vinícius de Melo Pereira1, Oranys Marin1, Sandro José Ribeiro Bonatto3, Suzany Silva3, Ivan Ricardo de Barros4, Carlos Ricardo Soccol5.
Abstract
This study reports the first phytochemical and biological characterization in treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma cells (H295R) of extracts from Nidularium procerum, an endemic bromeliad of Atlantic Forest vulnerable to extinction. Extracts of dry leaves obtained from in vitro-grown plants were recovered by different extraction methods, viz., hexanoic, ethanolic, and hot and cold aqueous. Chromatography-based metabolite profiling and chemical reaction methods revealed the presence of flavonoids, steroids, lipids, vitamins, among other antioxidant and antitumor biomolecules. Eicosanoic and tricosanoic acids, α-Tocopherol (vitamin E) and scutellarein were, for the first time, described in the Nidularium group. Ethanolic and aqueous extracts contained the highest phenolic content (107.3 mg of GAE.100 g-1) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) radical scavenging activity, respectively. The immunomodulatory and antitumoral activities of aqueous extracts were assessed using specific tests of murine macrophages modulation (RAW 264.7) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay against adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, respectively. The aqueous extract improved cell adhesion and phagocytic activities and phagolysossomal formation of murine macrophages. This constitutes new data on the Bromeliaceae family, which should be better exploited to the production of new phytomedicines for pharmacological uses.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32332902 PMCID: PMC7181841 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64026-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Preliminary screaning of hexane, ethanolic and aqueous extracts of Nidularium procerum Lindm shoots.
| Metabolites | Hexane Extract | Ethanolic Extract | Hot Aqueous Extract | Cold Aqueous Extract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids Dragendorff | − | + | ++ | +++ |
| Alkaloids Wagner | − | + | ++ | +++ |
| Alkaloids Mayer | − | + | ++ | +++ |
| Reducing Sugars | − | − | − | − |
| Quinones | − | − | − | − |
| Saponins | − | − | − | − |
| Mucilages | − | − | − | |
| Coumarins | − | − | − | − |
| Steroids/Triterpenoids | ++ | + | − | − |
| Resins | − | − | − | − |
| Flavonoids | + | ++ | ++ | |
| Tannins | − | ++ | + | + |
Blank spaces mean that the test was not performed on the extract.
(+) small quantity positive response was obtained for the chemical group in the extract.
(++) medium quantity positive response was obtained for the chemical group in the extract.
(+++) positive response of greater quantity was obtained for the chemical group in the extract.
(−) negative response was obtained for that chemical group in the extract.
Main compounds found in different extracts of N. procerum Lindm by GC-MS.
| Coumpounds | Chemical Class | Area | Retencion time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,11,15-trimethyl-3-methylidenehexadec-1-ene | Hydrocarbon | 5329 | 68.0 | 19.813 |
| Methyl hexadecanoate | Fatty Acid Ester | 10533 | 74.0 | 21.079 |
| Tetradecan-2-ylbenzene | Hydrocarbon | 59459 | 105.0 | 22.299 |
| Methyl (9 | Fatty Acid Ester | 2038 | 67.0 | 23.357 |
| 1-hexadecanoyloxy-3-hydroxypropan-2-yl)hexadecanoate | Fatty Acid Ester | 24428 | 57.0 | 25.871 |
| ( | Amide | 35867 | 59.0 | 26.662 |
| 1-iodotriacontane | Hydrocarbon | 38790 | 57.0 | 27.020 |
| (2-hydroxy-3-octadecanoyloxypropyl) octadecanoate | Fatty Acid Ester | 9716 | 57.0 | 28.218 |
| Tetracontane | Hydrocarbon | 56949 | 57.0 | 29.220 |
| (Z)-9-Octadecenoic acid 1,2,3-propanetriyl ester | Fatty Acid Ester | 14734 | 55.0 | 29.954 |
| ( | Aldheyde | 14614 | 55.0 | 30.112 |
| (1 | Hydrocarbon | 3318 | 147.0 | 30.717 |
| ( | Amide | 56502 | 59.0 | 31.153 |
| 3-[( | NC* | 10118 | 67.0 | 31.158 |
| 2-methyl-3-(4-propan-2-ylphenyl)propanal | Aldheyde | 39439 | 133.0 | 31.253 |
| 1-chloroheptacosane | Hydrocarbon | 51728 | 57.0 | 31.267 |
| 2-octyl-3-pentadecyloxirane | Hydrocarbon | 9077 | 55.0 | 31.270 |
| 3,4-dihexyl-7,7-dimethylcyclohepta-1,3,5-triene | Hydrocarbon | 18042 | 119.0 | 31.398 |
| 12-[(2 | Hydrocarbon | 6008 | 67.0 | 31.655 |
| 4-methyl-2-[(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)methylsulfanyl]-1 | NC | 67968 | 133.0 | 31.944 |
| Tetrapentacontane | Hydrocarbon | 88322 | 57.0 | 32.247 |
| Dotriacontane | Hydrocarbon | 14947 | 57.0 | 34.587 |
| 4- | Fatty Acid Ester | 26373 | 69.0 | 34.595 |
| α-Tocopherol-β-D-mannoside | Vitamin | 10086 | 165.0 | 35.329 |
| 5,6,7-trimethoxy-2-(4-methoxyphenyl)chromen-4-one | Flavone | 52630 | 327.0 | 36.140 |
| β sitoesterol | Steroid/Triterpene | 2386 | 135.0 | 38.729 |
| Cyclolaudenol | Steroid/Triterpene | 7665 | 207.0 | 41.783 |
| Stigmasterol | Steroid/Triterpene | 34250 | 95.0 | 43.329 |
| 1-(4-hydroxy-2-methylphenyl)ethanone | Acetophenone | 66807 | 150.0 | 13.982 |
| 2-(hydroxymethyl)-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol | Alcohol | 25556 | 57.00 | 16.115 |
| Trehalose | Saccharide | 56984 | 73.00 | 19.635 |
| Methyl hexadecanoate | Fatty Acid Ester | 13085 | 74.00 | 23.918 |
| Methyl (9 | Fatty Acid Ester | 3758 | 67.00 | 26.202 |
| Methyl octadeca-9,12,15-trienoate | Fatty Acid Ester | 7985 | 79.00 | 26.292 |
| (4 | Alcohol | 10890 | 59.00 | 5.676 |
| 1-(3-methoxyphenyl)ethanone | Acetophenone | 1754 | 44.00 | 14.113 |
| 2-chloro-4-methylpentan-3-ol | Alcohol | 7720 | 57.00 | 16.126 |
| β-D-galactopyranosyl-(1 → 4)-D-glucose | Saccharide | 11882 | 73.00 | 19.655 |
| [(E)-henicos-10-en-11-yl]benzene | Hydrocarbon | 6891 | 118.0 | 24.983 |
| Tetradecan-2-ylbenzene | Hydrocarbon | 12199 | 105.0 | 20.874 |
| Tetrapentacontane | Hydrocarbon | 42750 | 57.0 | 34.579 |
| α-Tocopherol-β-D-mannoside | Vitamin | 42982 | 165.0 | 35.317 |
| Stigmasterol | Steroid/Triterpene | 77970 | 95.0 | 43.328 |
*NC – Not Classified.
Percentage of fatty acid in relation to the total fatty acids present in the hexane, chloroform, hot aqueous and cold aqueous extracts of fresh N. procerum Lindm plants multiplied on MS after 90 days of in vitro culture.
| Esters obtained from fatty acids | % of Fatty Acids | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexane | Chloroform | HA | CA | |
| Methyl palmitate (C16:0) ( | zdc | 24.08 | 23.25 | 20.78 |
| Methyl palmitoleate (C16:1) ( | 5.87 | 2.86 | 5.36 | 6.66 |
| Methyl heptadecanoate (C17:0) ( | ND | ND | 4.16 | ND |
| Methyl octadecanoate (C18:0) ( | 4.62 | 9.10 | ND | 8.20 |
| cis-9-Oleic acid methyl ester (C18:1_cis9) ( | 15.81 | 10.25 | 34.86 | 24.12 |
| Linolelaidic acid methyl ester (C18:2) ( | 28.65 | 21.95 | 27.72 | 21.19 |
| Methyl Arachidate (C20:0) ( | 8.78 | 8.56 | 0 | 10.53 |
| ɣ -Linolenic acid methyl ester (C18:3 n-6) ( | 14.71 | 15.54 | 4.64 | 8.52 |
| Methyl tricosanoate (C23:0) ( | 1.79 | 7.66 | ND | ND |
Retention times of phenolic compounds present in aqueous extracts of N. procerum Lindm.
| Hot Aqueous extract of | Cold Aqueous extract of | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenolic Compounds | Wavelength (nm) | Ret. Time | Area | Concentration (µg.g−1) | Ret. Time | Area | Concentration (µg.g−1) |
| Galic Acid | 275 | 3.39 | 252476 | 2.35 ± 0.27 | 3.39 | 279619.3 | 2.63 ± 0.45 |
| p-Coumaric Acid | 311 | 18.6 | 991292 | 4.39 ± 1.98 | 18.56 | 1117747.3 | 4.96 ± 0.22 |
| Rutin | 357 | 21.7 | 129072 | 2.99 ± 0.33 | 21.72 | 143847 | 3.41 ± 0.23 |
| Daidzein | 260 | 23.4 | 161855 | BDL* | 23.1 | 170331 | BDL |
| Quercetin 3’,4’,5’,7– | 370 | 25 | 30647 | 0.67 ± 0.09 | 25 | 33351.6 | 0.71 ± 0.04 |
| Trans-Cinnamic Acid | 275 | 25.3 | 322897 | 1.15 ± 0.09 | 24.87 | 272689.6 | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
| Genistein | 325 | 25.7 | 244231 | 18.75 ± 3.36 | 25.9 | 252668.3 | 19.44 ± 4.41 |
*BDL – Below detection limit.
Figure 1Macrophages adhesion (A), Phagocytosis activity (B) and Phagolysosomal formation (C) of macrophages (cell line RAW 264.7) treated with hot aqueous extract (dark bars) and cold aqueous extract (gray bars) of Nidularium procerum Lindm. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12). Different letters on bars indicate significant differences by Tukey test (p < 0,05).
Figure 2Hydrogen Peroxide Production (A) and Superoxide Anion Production (B) of macrophages (cell line RAW 267.4) treated with hot aqueous extract (dark ars) and cold aqueous extract (gray bars) of Nidularium procerum Lindm. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12). Different letters on bars indicate significant differences by Tukey test (p < 0,05).
Figure 3Viability percentage of tumor cells (H295R) (A) and non-tumor cells (VERO) (B) treated with different concentrations of N. procerum Lindm aqueous extracts within 24 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 12). Different letters on bars indicate significant differences by Tukey test (p < 0.05). Black bars: Hot Aqueous Extract (HA). Grey bars: Cold Aqueous Extract (CA).
Figure 4Flowchart of methodologies used in chemical characterzation of different extracts of N. procum Lindm.