Pradip P Kamat1, Courtney E McCracken2, Harold K Simon2,3, Anne Stormorken4, Michael Mallory5, Corrie E Chumpitazi6, Joseph P Cravero7. 1. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, pradip.kamat@choa.org. 2. Departments of Pediatrics and. 3. Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Pediatric Emergency Medicine Associates, Scottish Rite Hospital, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; and. 7. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University and Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric subspecialists routinely provide procedural sedation outside the operating room. No large study has reported trends in outpatient pediatric procedural sedation. Our purpose in this study was to identify significant trends in outpatient procedural sedation using the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 2007 to 2018 were used for trending procedural sedation. Patient characteristics, medications, type of providers, serious adverse events, and interventions were reported. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to explore the association between the year and a given characteristic. RESULTS: A total of 432 842 sedation encounters were identified and divided into 3 4-year epochs (2007-2011, 2011-2014, and 2014-2018). There was a significant decrease in infants <3 months of age receiving procedural sedation (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.98). A large increase was noticed in pediatric hospitalists providing procedural sedation (0.6%-9.5%; P < .001); there was a decreasing trend in sedation by other providers who were not in emergency medicine, critical care, or anesthesiology (13.9%-3.9%; P < .001). There was an increasing trend in the use of dexmedetomidine (6.3%-9.3%; P < .001) and a decreasing trend in the use of chloral hydrate (6.3%-0.01%; P < .001) and pentobarbital (7.3%-0.5%; P < .001). Serious adverse events showed a nonsignificant increase overall (1.35%-1.75%). CONCLUSIONS: We report an increase in pediatric hospitalists providing sedation and a significant decrease in the use of chloral hydrate and pentobarbital by providers. Further studies are required to see if sedation services decrease costs and optimize resource use.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric subspecialists routinely provide procedural sedation outside the operating room. No large study has reported trends in outpatient pediatric procedural sedation. Our purpose in this study was to identify significant trends in outpatient procedural sedation using the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. METHODS: Prospectively collected data from 2007 to 2018 were used for trending procedural sedation. Patient characteristics, medications, type of providers, serious adverse events, and interventions were reported. The Cochran-Armitage test for trend was used to explore the association between the year and a given characteristic. RESULTS: A total of 432 842 sedation encounters were identified and divided into 3 4-year epochs (2007-2011, 2011-2014, and 2014-2018). There was a significant decrease in infants <3 months of age receiving procedural sedation (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.98). A large increase was noticed in pediatric hospitalists providing procedural sedation (0.6%-9.5%; P < .001); there was a decreasing trend in sedation by other providers who were not in emergency medicine, critical care, or anesthesiology (13.9%-3.9%; P < .001). There was an increasing trend in the use of dexmedetomidine (6.3%-9.3%; P < .001) and a decreasing trend in the use of chloral hydrate (6.3%-0.01%; P < .001) and pentobarbital (7.3%-0.5%; P < .001). Serious adverse events showed a nonsignificant increase overall (1.35%-1.75%). CONCLUSIONS: We report an increase in pediatric hospitalists providing sedation and a significant decrease in the use of chloral hydrate and pentobarbital by providers. Further studies are required to see if sedation services decrease costs and optimize resource use.
Authors: Jeong Yong Lee; Seung Jun Choi; Jun Sung Park; Jong Seung Lee; Jeong Min Ryu; Mi Sun Yum Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2021-08-23 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Kristina Liaudanskytė; Ilona Razlevičė; Tomas Bukauskas; Vilija Stremaitytė; Laura Lukošienė; Andrius Macas Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2022-07-24
Authors: Roberta Esteves Vieira de Castro; Miguel Rodríguez-Rubio; Maria Clara de Magalhães-Barbosa; Arnaldo Prata-Barbosa; Jaimee Holbrook; Pradip Kamat; Anne Stormorken Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-08-30 Impact factor: 3.569