Stacie L Warren1, Yuan Zhang2, Katherine Duberg2, Percy Mistry2, Weidong Cai2, Shaozheng Qin3, Sarah-Nicole Bostan2, Aarthi Padmanabhan2, Victor G Carrion2, Vinod Menon4. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Psychology, Palo Alto University, Palo Alto, California. 2. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California; State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, IDG/McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California. Electronic address: menon@stanford.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Anxiety and stress reactivity are risk factors for the development of affective disorders. However, the behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms that potentiate maladaptive emotion regulation are poorly understood. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in emotion regulation, but how anxiety and stress alter their context-specific causal circuit interactions is not known. Here, we use computational modeling to inform affective pathophysiology, etiology, and neurocircuit targets for early intervention. METHODS: Forty-five children (10-11 years of age; 25 boys) reappraised aversive stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Clinical measures of anxiety and stress were acquired for each child. Drift-diffusion modeling of behavioral data and causal circuit analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, with a National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria approach, were used to characterize latent behavioral and neurocircuit decision-making dynamics driving emotion regulation. RESULTS: Children successfully reappraised negative responses to aversive stimuli. Drift-diffusion modeling revealed that emotion regulation was characterized by increased initial bias toward positive reactivity during viewing of aversive stimuli and increased drift rate, which captured evidence accumulation during emotion evaluation. Crucially, anxiety and stress reactivity impaired latent behavioral dynamics associated with reappraisal and decision making. Anxiety and stress increased dynamic casual influences from the right amygdala to DLPFC. In contrast, DLPFC, but not amygdala, reactivity was correlated with evidence accumulation and decision making during emotion reappraisal. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide new insights into how anxiety and stress in children impact decision making and amygdala-DLPFC signaling during emotion regulation, and uncover latent behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms of early risk for psychopathology.
BACKGROUND:Anxiety and stress reactivity are risk factors for the development of affective disorders. However, the behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms that potentiate maladaptive emotion regulation are poorly understood. Neuroimaging studies have implicated the amygdala and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in emotion regulation, but how anxiety and stress alter their context-specific causal circuit interactions is not known. Here, we use computational modeling to inform affective pathophysiology, etiology, and neurocircuit targets for early intervention. METHODS: Forty-five children (10-11 years of age; 25 boys) reappraised aversive stimuli during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. Clinical measures of anxiety and stress were acquired for each child. Drift-diffusion modeling of behavioral data and causal circuit analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data, with a National Institute of Mental Health Research Domain Criteria approach, were used to characterize latent behavioral and neurocircuit decision-making dynamics driving emotion regulation. RESULTS:Children successfully reappraised negative responses to aversive stimuli. Drift-diffusion modeling revealed that emotion regulation was characterized by increased initial bias toward positive reactivity during viewing of aversive stimuli and increased drift rate, which captured evidence accumulation during emotion evaluation. Crucially, anxiety and stress reactivity impaired latent behavioral dynamics associated with reappraisal and decision making. Anxiety and stress increased dynamic casual influences from the right amygdala to DLPFC. In contrast, DLPFC, but not amygdala, reactivity was correlated with evidence accumulation and decision making during emotion reappraisal. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide new insights into how anxiety and stress in children impact decision making and amygdala-DLPFC signaling during emotion regulation, and uncover latent behavioral and neurocircuit mechanisms of early risk for psychopathology.
Authors: Kristen A Lindquist; Tor D Wager; Hedy Kober; Eliza Bliss-Moreau; Lisa Feldman Barrett Journal: Behav Brain Sci Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 12.579
Authors: Jason T Buhle; Jennifer A Silvers; Tor D Wager; Richard Lopez; Chukwudi Onyemekwu; Hedy Kober; Jochen Weber; Kevin N Ochsner Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2013-06-13 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Jennifer A Silvers; Catherine Insel; Alisa Powers; Peter Franz; Chelsea Helion; Rebecca E Martin; Jochen Weber; Walter Mischel; B J Casey; Kevin N Ochsner Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Simone P Haller; Joel Stoddard; David Pagliaccio; Hong Bui; Caroline MacGillivray; Matt Jones; Melissa A Brotman Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 8.829