| Literature DB >> 32331222 |
Thirega Mahalingam1, Weidong Chen2, Chandima Shashikala Rajapakse3, Kandangamuwa Pathirannahalage Somachandra4, Renuka Nilmini Attanayake1.
Abstract
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum is an important fungal pathogen on many economically important crops including cabbage worldwide. Even though population structure and genetic diversity of S. sclerotiorum is well studied in temperate climatic conditions, only a few studies have been conducted in tropical countries. It is also not clear whether the populations are clonal or recombining in the tropics. In filling this information gap, 47 isolates of S. sclerotiorum were collected from commercial cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) fields in Nuwara Eliya district of Sri Lanka, where the disease has been previously reported. All the isolates were subjected to genetic diversity study using mycelial compatibility grouping and microsatellite markers. Fourteen mycelial compatibility groups (MCGs) and 23 multilocus haplotypes (MLHs) were recorded. Mean expected heterozygosity of the population was 0.56. MLHs were weakly correlated with MCGs. Population genetic structure analysis and principal coordinates identified three genetic clusters. Genetic recombination was inferred within each genetic cluster when isolates were subjected to clone correction. There was evidence of multiple infections on single plant as detected by the presence of more than one MCG on each cabbage plant. However, multiple infections did not increase the disease severity in detached leaf assay. We found high genetic diversity and recombination of S. sclerotiorum population in a tropical country, Sri Lanka. Importance of detecting genetic structure when inferring recombination was also highlighted.Entities:
Keywords: Sclerotinia sclerotiorum; cabbage; genetic diversity; genetic structure; mycelial compatibility grouping; recombination
Year: 2020 PMID: 32331222 PMCID: PMC7238271 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9040306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathogens ISSN: 2076-0817
Origin of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates, their corresponding mycelial compatibility groups (MGCs) and multilocus haplotypes (MLHs).
| Isolate Name a | Location a | MCG | MLH | Isolate Name a | Location a | MCG | MLH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SS5 | Pattipola Field 2 | 1 | 1 | SS11 | Pattipola Field 4 | 3 | 2 |
| SS26 | Ambewela Field 1 | 1 | 1 | SS15 | Pattipola Field 5 | 3 | 2 |
| SS35 | Ambewela Field 3 | 1 | 1 | SS19 | Pattipola Field 6 | 3 | 2 |
| SS36 | Ambewela Field 4 | 1 | 1 | SS31 | Ambewela Field 1 | 3 | 2 |
| A25 | Seetha Eliya Field 5 | 1 | 1 | A20 | Seetha Eliya Field 3 | 3 | 2 |
| A27 | Seetha Eliya Field 6 | 1 | 1 | SS18 | Pattipola Field 6 | 3 | 15 |
| G2 | Meepilimana Filed 1 | 1 | 3 | A15 | Seetha Eliya Field 1 | 4 | 3 |
| SS6 | Pattipola Field 2 | 1 | 4 | A26 | Seetha Eliya Field 6 | 4 | 3 |
| SS21 | Pattipola Field 7 | 1 | 7 | G1 | Meepilimana Filed 1 | 4 | 3 |
| A21 | Seetha Eliya Field 3 | 1 | 7 | G3 | Meepilimana Filed 1 | 4 | 3 |
| A16 | Seetha Eliya Field 1 | 1 | 8 | SS17 | Pattipola Field 5 | 4 | 14 |
| A22 | Seetha Eliya Field 3 | 1 | 8 | SS20 | Pattipola Field 6 | 4 | 16 |
| SS9 | Pattipola Field 3 | 1 | 12 | SS24 | Pattipola Field 7 | 4 | 17 |
| SS32 | Ambewela Field 2 | 1 | 21 | SS2 | Pattipola Field 1 | 5 | 4 |
| SS8 | Pattipola Field 3 | 2 | 4 | SS4 | Pattipola Field 1 | 6 | 6 |
| A23 | Seetha Eliya Field 4 | 2 | 4 | A18 | Seetha Eliya Field 2 | 7 | 6 |
| SS10 | Pattipola Field 3 | 2 | 5 | A19 | Seetha Eliya Field 2 | 8 | 6 |
| SS13 | Pattipola Field 4 | 2 | 5 | A24 | Seetha Eliya Field 4 | 9 | 9 |
| SS22 | Pattipola Field 7 | 2 | 5 | A17 | Seetha Eliya Field 1 | 10 | 10 |
| SS25 | Pattipola Field 8 | 2 | 5 | SS27 | Ambewela Field 1 | 11 | 18 |
| SS3 | Pattipola Field 1 | 2 | 11 | SS29 | Ambewela Field 2 | 12 | 20 |
| SS14 | Pattipola Field 5 | 2 | 13 | SS33 | Ambewela Field 3 | 13 | 22 |
| SS28 | Ambewela Field 1 | 2 | 19 | SS34 | Ambewela Field 3 | 14 | 23 |
| SS7 | Pattipola Field 2 | 3 | 2 |
a Isolate names and locations are ordered according to mycelial compatibility groups (MCGs).
Microsatellite loci, allele size, allele frequency and expected heterozygosity of the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum population.
| Microsatellite Locus a | Allele (bp) b | Frequency c | Expected Heterozygosity ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5-2 | 340 | 0.2340 | 0.4947 |
| 342 | 0.6596 | ||
| 344 | 0.0638 | ||
| 346 | 0.0213 | ||
| 7-2 | 180 | 0.0426 | 0.6957 |
| 182 | 0.2553 | ||
| 190 | 0.4043 | ||
| 194 | 0.2979 | ||
| 12-2 | 235 | 0.2340 | 0.6818 |
| 237 | 0.3617 | ||
| 241 | 0.3830 | ||
| 243 | 0.0213 | ||
| 13-2 | 313 | 0.0426 | 0.5402 |
| 315 | 0.6596 | ||
| 329 | 0.1277 | ||
| 331 | 0.1277 | ||
| 333 | 0.0426 | ||
| 17-3 | 375 | 0.0213 | 0.7438 |
| 378 | 0.0426 | ||
| 381 | 0.4043 | ||
| 384 | 0.2553 | ||
| 399 | 0.1915 | ||
| 402 | 0.0638 | ||
| 405 | 0.0213 | ||
| 55-4 | 176 | 0.9574 | 0.0842 |
| 188 | 0.0213 | ||
| 204 | 0.0213 | ||
| 110-4 | 392 | 0.2553 | 0.3885 |
| 396 | 0.7447 | ||
| 114-4 | 359 | 0.0426 | 0.8343 |
| 383 | 0.1489 | ||
| 387 | 0.0213 | ||
| 395 | 0.2553 | ||
| 411 | 0.0213 | ||
| 415 | 0.2128 | ||
| 419 | 0.0213 | ||
| 435 | 0.1702 | ||
| 439 | 0.0638 |
a Eight microsatellite loci used in this experiment as described in Sirjusingh and Kohn [31]. b Allele size included M13 tail sequence and microsatellite repeat motifs. c Allele frequencies and expected heterozygosities were calculated using ARLEQUIN v.3.5.
Comparison of genetic diversity of the pathogen population on cabbage with previously published two Sclerotinia sclerotiorum pathogen populations on canola.
| Host (Number of Samples) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Genetic Diversity | Cabbage | Canola in China a | Canola in the USA a (N = 29) |
|
| |||
| Number of polymorphic loci | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| Total number of alleles | 38 | 24 | 29 |
| Mean number of alleles per locus | 4.75 | 3 | 3.63 |
| Mean expected heterozygosity ( | 0.56 | 0.46 | 0.59 |
|
| |||
| Number of mycelial compatibility groups | 14 | 27 | 19 |
| Number of multilocus haplotypes (g) | 23 | 29 | 19 |
| Genotypic richness (g/N) | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.66 |
a Results from Attanayake et al. [30] where the same eight microsatellite markers were used.
Figure 1Bar plot from STRUCTURE analysis when K = 3, showing the Sclerotinia sclerotiorum isolates assigned into three genetic clusters depicted in three colors. Y axis shows the Bayesian posterior probability of population assignment and each bar represents each isolate.
Figure 2Minimum spanning network with unique haplotype indicated by a circle and circle size is proportional to the number of isolates. Each haplotype is color coded as per STRUCTURE output and line thickness is proportionate to Bruvo’s distance. Line lengths are arbitrary.
Index of association (I), standardized index of association () values and their statistical significance for the whole population of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and genetic clusters inferred from STRUCTURE analysis.
| Population (N = Number of Isolates) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Whole population (N = 47) | 1.524 | 0.224 | <0.001 |
| Clone corrected whole population (N = 23) | 1.126 | 0.162 | <0.001 |
| Cluster 1 (N = 12) a | 0.036 | 0.018 | 0.463 |
| Clone corrected cluster 1 (N = 6) a | −0.455 | −0.228 | 1.000 |
| Cluster 2 (N = 12) a | 0.700 | 0.358 | 0.021 |
| Clone corrected cluster 2 (N = 5) a | 0.771 | 0.387 | 0.13 |
| Cluster 3 (N = 23) a | 1.661 | 0.279 | <0.001 |
| Clone corrected cluster 3 (N = 12) a | 1.211 | 0.202 | 0.001 |
a Genetic clusters inferred from STRUCTURE analysis. Clusters 1, 2, and 3 are depicted in red, green and blue respectively in the Figure 1.
Statistical significance (p values) of the pair-wise linkage disequilibrium tests for eight microsatellite loci of the clone corrected population of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum.
| Locus | 5-2 | 7-2 | 12-2 | 13-2 | 17-3 | 55-4 | 110-4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.892 | |||||||
| 0.972 | 1.000 | ||||||
| 0.811 | 1.000 | 1.000 | |||||
| 0.947 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||||
|
| 0.738 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | ||
| 0.453 | 0.543 | 0.423 | 0.675 | 0.321 | 0.826 | 0.714 |
Figure 3Bar graph showing the variation in lesion areas (cm2) of cabbage leaves inoculated with one or two different isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Isolates of the same mycelial compatibility group (MCG) are shown in blue color whereas the isolates of different MCGs are shown in ash color. Whiskers indicate one standard error of the mean. X axis shows the names of S. sclerotiorum isolates.
Figure 4Signs and symptoms of the white mold disease on cabbage head infected by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. (a) A cabbage plant with necrotic lesions, white mycelia and sclerotia on the top and covered with healthy leaves in the field (b) An infection focus showing four adjacent infected cabbage heads, three from a single raw and one on another raw.