Literature DB >> 3233113

The use of somatosensory evoked potentials for detection of neuropraxia during shoulder arthroscopy.

M I Pitman1, N Nainzadeh, E Ergas, S Springer.   

Abstract

With the increase in the use of shoulder arthroscopy in the past decade, there has been an increased awareness of complications. Reports of the occurrence of transient neuropraxia indicate an incidence of 10%-30%. The recording of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) for the study and functional monitoring of the sensory pathway is well accepted as a reproducible method of monitoring peripheral nerve and spinal cord function during surgery. SEPs were recorded during shoulder arthroscopy in 20 patients to monitor the musculocutaneous nerve, ulnar nerve, and either the median or radial nerve. In all 20 cases, abnormal SEPs of the musculocutaneous nerve were demonstrated. In 16 cases, this was produced upon initial joint distention, and in 15 cases, by traction; in 11, by longitudinal traction of greater than or equal to 12 lb, and in six by perpendicular traction of greater than or equal to 7 lb. In 10 patients, there were varying combinations of median, ulnar, and radial nerve involvement. There were two cases of clinical neuropraxia in this series. One resolved in 24 h and one in 48 h. The conclusion is that there is a real potential for neurologic damage during shoulder arthroscopy and that the musculocutaneous nerve is the most vulnerable. Factors responsible include joint distention, excessive traction, and extravasation of fluid. The use of SEPs provides a reliable means for monitoring the neurologic status of the extremity during shoulder arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3233113     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(88)80039-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  17 in total

1.  Postoperative pectoral swelling after shoulder arthroscopy.

Authors:  Ersin Ercin; Mustafa Gokhan Bilgili; Halil Nadir Ones; Cemal Kural
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-28

2.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Fenestrated cannulae with outflow reduces fluid gain in shoulder arthroscopy.

Authors:  Hasan M Syed; Seth B Gillham; Christopher M Jobe; Wesley P Phipatanakul; Montri D Wongworawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Arthroscopic surgery of the shoulder.

Authors:  D J Ogilvie-Harris; G D'Angelo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The Supine Position for Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Chonlathan Iamsumang; Bancha Chernchujit
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-10-03

6.  The silent assistant in elbow surgery.

Authors:  J R Adam; C L Talbot; E M Holt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Positioning patients for spine surgery: Avoiding uncommon position-related complications.

Authors:  Ihab Kamel; Rodger Barnette
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-09-18

8.  Neurophysiological identification of position-induced neurologic injury during anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Daniel M Schwartz; Anthony K Sestokas; Alan S Hilibrand; Alexander R Vaccaro; Bikash Bose; Mark Li; Todd J Albert
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Somatosensory evoked potentials are not a sensitive indicator of potential positioning injury in the prone patient.

Authors:  N A Lorenzini; K A Poterack
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-03

Review 10.  [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression].

Authors:  S Lerch; S Elki; M Jaeger; T Berndt
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.