Literature DB >> 32330459

How I Select Which Patients With ARDS Should Be Treated With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

E Caroline Bullen1, Ricardo Teijeiro-Paradis1, Eddy Fan2.   

Abstract

ARDS is a lethal form of acute respiratory failure, and because no specific treatments exist, supportive care remains the primary management strategy in these patients. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as an intervention in patients with severe ARDS to facilitate gas exchange and the delivery of more lung protective ventilation. Over the past 20 years, improvements in ECMO technology have increased its safety and transportability, making it far more available to this patient population globally. Deciding which patients with ARDS should be initiated on ECMO remains a challenging question. Numerous clinical and laboratory markers have been investigated, and multiple risk scores developed, to aid physicians in this decision-making process. However, they are still imperfect, and the choice is often based on institutional guidelines and the clinical impression of the treating physician. Given the potential risks and resource implications for this intervention, patient selection is critical and it is important to provide ECMO only to patients who have a reasonable chance for recovery or bridge to transplantation. In patients undergoing ECMO where there is no potential for recovery or transplant, the only option may be withdrawal of ECMO and palliation. These patients may be awake and interactive, which is often a very challenging scenario for patients, families, and the clinical team. In this article, we present a more controversial case and a review of the literature regarding the selection of patients with ARDS who should receive ECMO.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARDS; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; hypoxemic respiratory failure; patient selection

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32330459     DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Impact of an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Intensivist-Led Multidisciplinary Team on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Outcomes.

Authors:  Ken Junyang Goh; Qiao Li Tan; Chee Kiang Tay; Duu Wen Sewa; Ken Cheah Hooi Lee; Ghee Chee Phua
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 2.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in COVID-19.

Authors:  Manuel Tisminetzky; Bruno L Ferreyro; Eddy Fan
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.879

3.  Implementation of a regional multidisciplinary veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation unit improved survival: a historical cohort study.

Authors:  Maxime Nguyen; Valentin Kabbout; Vivien Berthoud; Isabelle Gounot; Ophélie Dransart-Raye; Christophe Douguet; Olivier Bouchot; Marie-Catherine Morgant; Belaid Bouhemad; Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.713

Review 4.  Prone positioning in ARDS patients supported with VV ECMO, what we should explore?

Authors:  Hongling Zhang; Zhengdong Liu; Huaqing Shu; Yuan Yu; Xiaobo Yang; Ruiting Li; Jiqian Xu; Xiaojing Zou; You Shang
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2022-10-04

5.  Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Li-Chung Chiu; Li-Pang Chuang; Shaw-Woei Leu; Yu-Jr Lin; Chee-Jen Chang; Hsin-Hsien Li; Feng-Chun Tsai; Chih-Hao Chang; Chen-Yiu Hung; Shih-Wei Lin; Han-Chung Hu; Chung-Chi Huang; Huang-Pin Wu; Kuo-Chin Kao
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.