| Literature DB >> 32328432 |
Cheng-Long Shen1, Qing Lou1, Jin-Hao Zang1, Kai-Kai Liu1, Song-Nan Qu2, Lin Dong1, Chong-Xin Shan1.
Abstract
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are generated in the body and related to many pathophysiological processes. Hence, detection of ROS is indispensable in understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of many diseases. Here, near-infrared (NIR) chemiluminescent (CL) carbon nanodots (CDs) are fabricated for the first time and their CL quantum yield can reach 9.98 × 10-3 einstein mol-1, which is the highest value ever reported for CDs until now. Nanointegration of NIR CDs and peroxalate (P-CDs) through the bridging effect of amphiphilic triblock copolymer can serve as turn-on probes for the detection and imaging of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). Considering high efficiency and large penetration depth of NIR photons, the P-CDs are employed in bioimaging H2O2 in vitro and in vivo, and the detection limit can reach 5 × 10-9 m, among the best reported of CDs-based sensors. Moreover, imaging of inflammatory H2O2 in a mouse model of peritonitis is achieved by employing the P-CDs as sensors. The results may provide a clue for the diagnosis and treatment of inflammation or cancers employing CL CDs as sensors.Entities:
Keywords: bioimaging; carbon nanodots; chemiluminescence; reactive oxygen species; sensors; turn‐on probes
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328432 PMCID: PMC7175254 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201903525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images, high‐resolution TEM (HRTEM) images, and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of the carbon nanodots (CDs) (inset: the size distribution of the CDs). b) 3D fluorescence mapping of the CDs in aqueous solution. (inset: the fluorescence image of the CDs under sunlight (left) and 365 nm UV excitation (right)). c) The decay spectra of the chemiluminescent (CL) from the CDs (inset: the photograph of the CL from the CDs). d) CL response of the CDs to various reactive oxygen species (ROS) in CL analysis instrument. CL signal intensities response of CDs to the concentration of e) CD, f) CPPO, and g) H2O2.
Photoluminescence (PL) and chemiluminescent (CL) characteristics of the carbon nanodots (CDs)
| Samples | λem
| τ | λem
| ΦC
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDs | 642 | 5.9 | 647 | 9.98 × 10−3 |
PL maximum peak
PL lifetime
CL maximum peak
CL quantum yield.
Figure 2a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the M‐CDs. b) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the M‐CDs (inset: the size distribution of the M‐CDs). c) The UV–Vis absorption spectra of the CDs in aqueous and M‐CDs in CH2Cl2 (inset: the distribution of CDs and M‐CDs in H2O−CH2Cl2). d) 1H NMR spectra of the CDs in D2O and M‐CDs in CDCl3. e) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra of the CDs and M‐CDs. f) Emission spectra after adding M‐CDs solution into CPPO and H2O2 solution (inset: the image of the chemiluminescent (CL) M‐CDs).
Figure 3a) Schematic illustration of the preparation of the P‐CDs. b) Dynamic light scattering (DLS) distribution of the P‐CDs (inset: transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the P‐CDs). c) The photoluminescence (PL) and CL emission spectra of the P‐CDs, PL spectra is detected under 540 nm excitation for P‐CDs aqueous solution and CL is detected by adding 1 mL, 10 mg mL−1 P‐CDs solution into 20 × 10−3 m H2O2 (inset: the photograph of P‐CDs in H2O2 captured with 30 s). d) The dynamic CL spectra of the P‐CDs. e) Cell viability of Hela cells after 24 h incubation in the different concentration of the P‐CDs.
Chemiluminescent (CL) QYs of P‐CDs with different M‐CDs in 0.2 m H2O2
| Samples | ΦC
| ΦC
| ΦC
| ΦC
| ΦC
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P‐CDs | 0.1 mg | 1.0 mg | 1.5 mg | 2.0 mg | 3.0 mg |
| 2.35 × 10−5 | 2.11 × 10−4 | 2.48 × 10−4 | 1.87 × 10−3 | 1.66 × 10−4 |
CL quantum yield.
Figure 4a) Schematic illustration of the exogenous sensing for reactive oxygen species (ROS). b) Photoluminescence (PL) and chemiluminescent (CL) images of P‐CDs in the presence of different concentration of H2O2. c) PL and CL intensities of P‐CDs under different concentration of H2O2. d) In vivo PL images of mice with the subcutaneous implantation of different concentration of H2O2. e) PL intensities as a function of the concentration of H2O2. f) In vivo CL images of mice with the subcutaneous implantation of different concentration of H2O2 (n = 3 mice per group). g) CL intensities as a function of the concentration of H2O2 (n = 3 mice per group).
Figure 5In vivo imaging of endogenous H2O2 in the mouse model of peritonitis. a) Photoluminescence (PL) and c) chemiluminescent (CL) images of mice intraperitoneally treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), LPS plus glutathione (GSH) and saline, followed by an intraperitoneal injection of P‐CDs at t = 4 h later. Quantification of b) PL and d) CL intensities for the in vivo images.