| Literature DB >> 32328395 |
.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002473.].Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328395 PMCID: PMC7015606 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ISSN: 2169-7574
Fig. 5.Hammock technique with 1 risk factor. A, Preoperative views of a patient with 1 risk factor requiring symmetrization mastopexy. B, Postoperative result at 3 months after hammock mastopexy. C, Result at 6 months after surgery. D, Result at 12 months after surgery.
Fig. 9.Comparaison between Hammock technique and control technique. A, Deflated upper pole, pseudoptosis, and ptosis in a patient with 2 risk factors. B, Stable maintenance of upper pole fullness and projection, attaining the profile of the “ideal breast” after mastopexy with the hammock technique. C, Preoperative profile image of a patient with 2 risk factors. D, Postoperative image after mastopexy without the hammock technique. E, The ideal breast shape in a 27-year-old model.