| Literature DB >> 32328279 |
Anyan Wen1, Likang Qin2,3,4, Haiying Zeng2,3, Yi Zhu5.
Abstract
The physicochemical properties and antioxidant activity of B. subtilis-fermented polished adlay (BPA) subjected to different drying methods (hot-air drying, HAD; infrared-radiation drying, IRD; vacuum drying, VD; microwave-vacuum drying, MVD; and freeze-vacuum drying, FVD) were evaluated in this study. Results showed FVD was ideal for maintaining the natural appearance and higher contents of proximate compositions, free fatty acids, tetramethylpyrazine (6.91 mg/g DW), coixol (0.62 mg/g DW), coixenolide (4.21% DW), coixan (35.10% DW), and triterpenoids (17.41 mg/g DW). The higher contents of total phenolics and flavonoids, stronger antioxidant activity, and higher color differences were observed in HAD and IRD samples. MVD displayed the shorter drying time, higher γ-aminobutyric acid content, and higher retention ratios of tetramethylpyrazine (75.54%), coixol (87.10%), coixenolide (98.57%), and coixan (99.11%). Pearson's correlation coefficient exhibited that the positive correlation between the contents of phenolics and flavonoids and the antioxidant activities of all dried BPA samples was observed (R 2 > 0.881, p < .05). Principal component analysis showed that the top three categories of comprehensive quality were FVD-, MVD-, and VD-treated BPA samples. In conclusion, MVD should be a potential preservation method to obtain high-quality dried BPA for short drying time and high comprehensive quality.Entities:
Keywords: B. subtilis‐fermented polished adlay; antioxidant activity; drying methods; physicochemical properties; principal component analysis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32328279 PMCID: PMC7174208 DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Food Sci Nutr ISSN: 2048-7177 Impact factor: 2.863
Maximum final moisture content and time
| Drying methods | Temperature (°C) | Vacuum pressure (Mpa) | Time (hr) | Wet weight (g) | Drying weight (g) | Maximum final moisture content (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAD | 50 | – | 24 | 150 | 12.99 | 8.66 |
| IRD | 50 | – | 22 | 150 | 13.16 | 8.77 |
| VD | 50 | 0.06 | 21 | 150 | 12.64 | 8.42 |
| MVD | 35–45 | −0.085 | 35 (min) | 150 | 13.04 | 8.69 |
| FVD | −64 | 0.01 | 20 | 150 | 12.35 | 8.23 |
Abbreviations: FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying; HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; VD, vacuum drying.
Physicochemical properties of BDA prepared by five drying methods
| Drying methods |
|
|
| ΔE | Protein (% DW) | Starch (% DW) | Fat (% DW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAD | 22.03 ± 1.16b | 11.39 ± 0.34b | 5.48 ± 0.57d | 12.13 ± 0.52b | 10.68 ± 0.81a | 26.34 ± 0.29c | 6.80 ± 0.19ab |
| IRD | 18.35 ± 0.61c | 14.74 ± 0.49a | 6.86 ± 0.48c | 17.00 ± 0.40a | 11.17 ± 0.45a | 27.59 ± 0.53ab | 6.79 ± 0.30ab |
| VD | 21.93 ± 1.02b | 10.19 ± 0.80c | 9.70 ± 0.52ab | 11.61 ± 0.33b | 10.42 ± 0.54a | 26.80 ± 0.40b | 6.56 ± 0.19b |
| MVD | 30.71 ± 0.74a | 11.15 ± 0.71bc | 10.04 ± 0.44a | 11.18 ± 0.43c | 11.21 ± 0.39a | 27.29 ± 0.37d | 7.24 ± 0.24a |
| FVD | 21.92 ± 0.95b | 10.74 ± 0.56bc | 8.66 ± 0.61b | 9.77 ± 0.61b | 11.40 ± 0.62a | 28.51 ± 0.58a | 6.82 ± 0.31ab |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. Different lower‐case letters in the same column indicate significant differences at p < .05.
Abbreviations: FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying; HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; VD, vacuum drying.
Contents of fatty acids in BDA dried by five drying methods (g/100 g DW)
| Fatty acids | HAD | IRD | VD | WVD | FVD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hexanoic | 0.01 ± 0.00a | 0.01 ± 0.00a | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01a |
| Octanoic (C8:0) | 0.01 ± 0.01a | 0.01 ± 0.00a | <0.01 | <0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01a |
| Lauric (12:0) | 0.02 ± 0.00b | 0.02 ± 0.02ab | 0.02 ± 0.01a | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.03 ± 0.00a |
| Myristic (C14:0) | 0.03 ± 0.01a | 0.03 ± 0.02ab | 0.05 ± 0.00a | 0.03 ± 0.00b | 0.06 ± 0.02a |
| Pentadecanoic (C15:0) | 0.02 ± 0.01bc | 0.02 ± 0.00c | 0.04 ± 0.01ab | 0.02 ± 0.02bc | 0.05 ± 0.00a |
| Palmitic (C16:0) | 7.17 ± 0.38c | 6.62 ± 0.56d | 9.86 ± 0.27b | 7.82 ± 0.40c | 10.81 ± 0.34a |
| Heptadecanoic (C17:0) | 0.07 ± 0.04ab | 0.07 ± 0.02b | 0.10 ± 0.00a | 0.07 ± 0.01b | 0.12 ± 0.03a |
| Stearic (C18:0) | 1.25 ± 0.11c | 1.17 ± 0.14c | 2.18 ± 0.20ab | 1.39 ± 0.09c | 2.41 ± 0.15a |
| Arachidic (C20:0) | 0.25 ± 0.01b | 0.29 ± 0.06b | 0.48 ± 0.02a | 0.33 ± 0.07b | 0.56 ± 0.08a |
| Heneicosanoic (C21:0) | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.03 ± 0.01ab | 0.02 ± 0.00b | 0.04 ± 0.00a |
| Behenic (C22:0) | 0.09 ± 0.01b | 0.09 ± 0.03b | 0.20 ± 0.04a | 0.09 ± 0.02b | 0.21 ± 0.05a |
| Lignoceric (C24:0) | 0.06 ± 0.03c | 0.05 ± 0.00d | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 0.06 ± 0.00d | 0.17 ± 0.04a |
| Total SFA | 8.98 | 8.37 | 13.13 | 9.85 | 14.47 |
| Palmitoleic (C16:1) | 0.12 ± 0.01a | 0.12 ± 0.02a | 0.10 ± 0.04a | 0.13 ± 0.05a | 0.11 ± 0.02a |
| Oleic (C18:1) | 27.19 ± 0.31b | 25.44 ± 0.57c | 30.47 ± 0.29a | 29.95 ± 0.42a | 30.10 ± 0.36a |
| Eicosenoic (C20:1) | 0.14 ± 0.05a | 0.14 ± 0.02a | 0.20 ± 0.04a | 0.14 ± 0.03a | 0.18 ± 0.05a |
| Total MUFA | 27.44 | 25.70 | 30.77 | 30.23 | 30.38 |
| Linoleic (C18:2) | 14.39 ± 0.32c | 13.47 ± 0.49d | 15.46 ± 0.26b | 15.70 ± 0.50b | 15.31 ± 0.44b |
| α‐Linolenic (C18:3) | 0.50 ± 0.04a | 0.50 ± 0.10a | 0.54 ± 0.07a | 0.54 ± 0.06a | 0.49 ± 0.09a |
| Arachidonate (C20:4) | 0.03 ± 0.00c | 0.03 ± 0.03c | 0.08 ± 0.01b | 0.03 ± 0.02c | 0.10 ± 0.01a |
| Total PUFA | 14.92 | 14.00 | 16.08 | 16.28 | 15.90 |
| TFA | 51.34 | 48.08 | 59.98 | 56.35 | 60.76 |
| PUFA/SFA | 1.66 | 1.67 | 1.23 | 1.65 | 1.10 |
Results are expressed as mean ± standard error. Lower‐case letters in the same line indicate significant differences at p < .05.
Abbreviations: FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying; HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acid; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acid; SFA, saturated fatty acid; TFA, total fatty acids; VD, vacuum drying.
Figure 1Effects of drying method on bioactive components in BPA. (a) Tetramethylpyrazine and acetoin; (b) coixol, coixenolide, and coixan; (c) γ‐aminobutyric acid; and (d) phenolics, flavonoids, and triterpenoids. HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; VD, vacuum drying; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; and FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying
Figure 2Effects of drying method on antioxidant activity in BPA. FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying; HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; VD, vacuum drying
Pearson's correlation coefficients between the bioactive components and antioxidant activities of dried BPA
| Antioxidant activity | MTP | Acetoin | Coixol | Coixenolide | Coixan | GABA | Phenolics | Flavonoids | Triterpenoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS | −.449 | .493 | −.449 | .493 | −.784 | −.676 | .884 | .881 | −.125 |
| DPPH | −.689 | .683 | −.689 | .683 | −.504 | −.617 | .906 | .906 | −.045 |
| FRAP | −.665 | .835 | −.665 | .835 | −.191 | −.594 | .868 | .859 | .132 |
Represents the significant correlation (p < .05).
Figure 3Principal component analysis loading plot (a) and score plot (b) describing relationship among different properties of BPA treated by five drying methods. FVD, freeze‐vacuum drying; HAD, hot‐air drying; IRD, infrared drying; MVD, microwave‐vacuum drying; VD, vacuum drying