Literature DB >> 32328175

Reversal of HER2 Negativity: An Unexpected Role for Lovastatin in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells.

Huimei Yi1,2, Mi Wu1,2, Qiuting Zhang1, Lu Lu1,2, Hui Yao1,2, Sisi Chen1,2, Ying Li1,2, Chanjuan Zheng1, Guangchun He1,2, Xiyun Deng1,2.   

Abstract

Effective treatment modality for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is currently lacking due to the absence of defined receptor targets. Recently, we have demonstrated that lovastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor and a lipid-lowering drug, can selectively inhibit TNBC by targeting cancer stem cells in vivo and in vitro. Interestingly, we found that lovastatin induced the reappearance of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), one of the triple receptors that are missing in TNBC. This prompted us to explore the possibility of regaining sensitivity of TNBC cancer stem cells to receptor tyrosine kinase-targeting drugs. We found that while the combination of lovastatin with a HER2 inhibitor was not sufficient to show synergism, addition of an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1) inhibitor to this combination resulted in significant synergistic inhibitory effect on cell viability. Our findings provide a potential novel strategy of designing a cocktail composed of a lipid-lowering drug and two receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of TNBC. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  HER2; cancer stem cell; cancer therapy; lovastatin; reversal; triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2020        PMID: 32328175      PMCID: PMC7171481          DOI: 10.7150/jca.39265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common female malignancy and is responsible for about 14% of cancer-related deaths in women 1. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), characterized by the absence of expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), is the most aggressive and deadly subtype of breast cancer 2. TNBCs constitute 15-20% of all diagnosed breast cancer cases and preferably strike younger patients 3. Tumor characteristics of TNBCs include rare histologies, high grade, and elevated mitotic count, tumor necrosis, pushing margins of invasion, larger tumor size, and axillary node involvement 4. Currently, TNBC patients cannot be treated with endocrine or HER2-targeting therapies used for non-TNBC patients. Although initially responsive to chemotherapy, TNBC patients relapse more frequently than those with other subtypes of breast tumors 4, 5. Therefore, understanding the biology of the missing receptors and exploring the possibilities of their reactivation become extremely crucial both on the bench and in the clinic, with the hope of regaining sensitivity for TNBC cells to receptor-targeting drugs. Lovastatin (LV), a natural 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, is one of the most commonly used lipid-lowing drugs 6. The anti-cancer properties of statins have attracted increasing interest over the last decades 7. Our recent studies have demonstrated that LV can inhibit TNBC by targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) both in vivo and in vitro 8, 9. However, it is not known whether LV is able to reverse the triple-negative phenotype in TNBC cells. In this study, we unexpectedly found that LV could induce the reappearance of HER2, one of the missing receptors in TNBC cells. This prompted us to examine whether this reversal of receptor-negative phenotype could sensitize these cells to the drugs that target the receptor tyrosine kinases. Our pilot study provides evidence that the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors that specifically target HER2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER1), respectively, could act synergistically to suppress the cell viability of LV-challenged TNBC CSCs. These findings provide a potential strategy of combination therapy for TNBC that deserves further investigations in more sophisticated model systems.

Lovastatin induces the reappearance of HER2 in TNBC CSCs

In order to determine whether LV could reverse the triple-negative phenotype of TNBC, we first performed immunohistochemistry to evaluate the status of HER2 and ER in the nude mouse model of orthotopic tumor growth derived from mammary fat pad injection of TNBC MDA-MB-231 CSCs. We found that LV induced the reappearance of HER2 in the tumor tissues (Figure . LV also induced the reappearance of ER in the same mouse model (data not shown). In cultured MDA-MB-231 CSCs, LV-induced reappearance of HER2 was demonstrated by immunofluorescence-laser scanning confocal microscopy (Figure . However, unlike the solely membranous distribution in non-TNBC MDA-MB-453 CSCs, LV-induced HER2 in TNBC CSCs showed a distinct pattern of both membranous and cytoplasmic distribution. This suggests that LV-induced HER2 might be different from the prototype HER2 in HER2-positive cells.

Targeting of both HER2 and EGFR/HER1 signaling synergistically inhibits the viability of lovastatin-treated TNBC CSCs

To explore the possibility whether LV-induced HER2 could sensitize TNBC CSCs to HER2-targeting drugs, we combined LV with a HER2 inhibitor (TAK 165) to treat TNBC CSCs. Unfortunately, this combination did not synergistically inhibit the cell viability of TNBC CSCs. Considering the fact that EGFR/HER1 signaling pathway is activated in ER-negative breast cancer 10, 11, we next added an EGFR/HER1 inhibitor (AG 1478) to the combination of LV and HER2 inhibitor to treat TNBC CSCs. As expected, this cocktail could act synergistically to inhibit the cell viability of TNBC CSCs (Figure . These results highlight the importance of inhibition of both HER2 and EGFR/HER1 signaling in eradicating TNBC CSCs that survive LV treatment.

Perspectives

Recently, we have demonstrated that LV, by itself, could induce death of TNBC CSCs through induction of stress response pathways 12 and inhibition of stemness properties (data not shown). It is likely that at the concentration used (1 µM), LV causes the death of some cells, while sparing the rest of the cells with HER2 signaling pathway reactivated. Reactivation of this life-sustaining signaling pathway confers the cells the capability to survive the harsh environment such as stressor challenge. In relation to the triple negativity of TNBC, the activation of HER2 signaling reverses the receptor-negative phenotype. It is hoped that the reappearance of the missing receptor should render the cells sensitive to receptor-targeting therapies, which will have a great clinical impact on the treatment of TNBC. In our hands, although the combination of LV with a HER2 inhibitor had no synergistically inhibitory effect on TNBC CSCs, the cocktail composed of LV and two receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, i.e., a HER2 inhibitor (TAK 165) and an EGFR/HER1 inhibitor (AG 1478), could synergistically inhibit the cell viability. We chose to use these inhibitors as a proof of concept because they are more specific for the individual signaling pathway than the commonly used dual-specificity receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as lapatinib. In the case of TNBC CSCs, simultaneous inhibition of the complex intracellular signaling pathways, e.g., multiple receptor signaling and stemness-sustaining signaling, might be necessary in eliminating CSCs (Figure . Since HER2 signaling is related to cell proliferation and/or survival, the reactivation of this pathway is of utmost importance in designing therapeutic strategy targeting cell proliferation and survival. In the future, we need to investigate the impact of the reversal of receptor negativity on cell behavior in more sophisticated model systems, including models of cancer cell implantation or patient-derived xenografts. We are far away from a clear view of the whole picture of the reversal of receptor negativity and its clinical implications. Nevertheless, this possibility provides a valuable opportunity for us to explore to fight against the difficult-to-treat TNBC.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Ian E Smith; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Triple-negative breast cancer: disease entity or title of convenience?

Authors:  Lisa Carey; Eric Winer; Giuseppe Viale; David Cameron; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Cerasomal Lovastatin Nanohybrids for Efficient Inhibition of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Stem Cells To Improve Therapeutic Efficacy.

Authors:  Liujiang Song; Xiaojun Tao; Li Lin; Chao Chen; Hui Yao; Guangchun He; Guangyang Zou; Zhong Cao; Shichao Yan; Lu Lu; Huimei Yi; Di Wu; Siyuan Tan; Wanxin Ouyang; Zhifei Dai; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 4.  Anticancer properties of Monascus metabolites.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Junwen Liu; Feijun Luo; Qinlu Lin; Thomas J Rosol; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  Anticancer Drugs       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptors associated with lack of response to endocrine therapy in recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  S Nicholson; J R Sainsbury; P Halcrow; P Chambers; J R Farndon; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-01-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Triple-negative breast cancer: therapeutic options.

Authors:  Susan Cleator; Wolfgang Heller; R Charles Coombes
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Rebecca L Siegel; Kevin D Stein; Joan L Kramer; Rick Alteri; Anthony S Robbins; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Epidermal-growth-factor receptors and oestrogen receptors in human breast cancer.

Authors:  J R Sainsbury; J R Farndon; G V Sherbet; A L Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-02-16       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Nucleolar stress: is there a reverse version?

Authors:  Lu Lu; Huimei Yi; Chao Chen; Shichao Yan; Hui Yao; Guangchun He; Guifei Li; Yiqun Jiang; Tuo Deng; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Effects of Lovastatin on MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells: An Antibody Microarray Analysis.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Hui Yao; Guangchun He; Liujiang Song; Ning Liu; Yan Wang; Yingke Yang; Evan T Keller; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Lovastatin on Brain Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Efosa Amadasu; Richard Kang; Ahsan Usmani; Cesario V Borlongan
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.139

2.  Hexokinase 2 Is a Pivot for Lovastatin-induced Glycolysis-to-Autophagy Reprogramming in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Lian Xue; Mi Wu; Ying Li; Sisi Chen; Muyao Wu; Jianyu Zhu; Siyu Ding; Qiuting Zhang; Chanjuan Zheng; Guangchun He; Shujun Fu; Guifei Li; Xiyun Deng
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.478

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.