Isaac C Rhew1, Charles B Fleming1, Siny Tsang2, Erin Horn3, Rick Kosterman4, Glen E Duncan2. 1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 2. Health Education and Research Building, Washington State University, Washington State Twin Registry, Spokane, Washington, USA. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. 4. Social Development Research Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Abstract
Background: There has been increased interest in the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in the development of problematic alcohol use, including socioeconomic conditions of the neighborhood. Using a co-twin design, we examined the extent to which contributions of genetic, shared environmental, and unique environmental influences on hazardous drinking differed according to levels of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Method: Data came from 1,521 monozygotic (MZ) and 609 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs surveyed in Washington State. A measure of neighborhood deprivation was created based on census-tract-level variables and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test 3-item instrument was used to assess level of hazardous drinking. We tested a series of nested structural equation models to examine associations among hazardous drinking, neighborhood deprivation, and the variance components (genetic [A], shared [C] and unique environmental [E] influences) of these two constructs, testing for both main effects and moderation by neighborhood deprivation. Results: Neighborhood deprivation was significantly associated with increased hazardous drinking, after accounting for A and C variance common to both phenotypes. Adjusting for within-pair differences in income and education, neighborhood deprivation moderated the magnitude of variance components of hazardous drinking, with the variance attributable to shared environment and non-shared environment increasing in more deprived neighborhoods. Conclusions: Findings point to amplification of early childhood as well as unique adulthood environmental risk on hazardous drinking in areas of greater deprivation.
Background: There has been increased interest in the interplay of genetic and environmental factors in the development of problematic alcohol use, including socioeconomic conditions of the neighborhood. Using a co-twin design, we examined the extent to which contributions of genetic, shared environmental, and unique environmental influences on hazardous drinking differed according to levels of neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation. Method: Data came from 1,521 monozygotic (MZ) and 609 dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs surveyed in Washington State. A measure of neighborhood deprivation was created based on census-tract-level variables and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test 3-item instrument was used to assess level of hazardous drinking. We tested a series of nested structural equation models to examine associations among hazardous drinking, neighborhood deprivation, and the variance components (genetic [A], shared [C] and unique environmental [E] influences) of these two constructs, testing for both main effects and moderation by neighborhood deprivation. Results:Neighborhood deprivation was significantly associated with increased hazardous drinking, after accounting for A and C variance common to both phenotypes. Adjusting for within-pair differences in income and education, neighborhood deprivation moderated the magnitude of variance components of hazardous drinking, with the variance attributable to shared environment and non-shared environment increasing in more deprived neighborhoods. Conclusions: Findings point to amplification of early childhood as well as unique adulthood environmental risk on hazardous drinking in areas of greater deprivation.
Authors: Deborah A Dawson; Sharon M Smith; Tulshi D Saha; Anna D Rubinsky; Bridget F Grant Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Jonathan Covault; Howard Tennen; Stephen Armeli; Tamlin S Conner; Aryeh I Herman; Antonius H N Cillessen; Henry R Kranzler Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Bridget F Grant; S Patricia Chou; Tulshi D Saha; Roger P Pickering; Bradley T Kerridge; W June Ruan; Boji Huang; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Amy Fan; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.596