| Literature DB >> 32326434 |
Lara Pérez-Etayo1, David González1,2, Ana Isabel Vitas1,2.
Abstract
One of the main public health problems nowadays is the increase of antimicrobial resistance, both in the hospital environment and outside it (animal environment, food and aquatic ecosystems, among others). It is necessary to investigate the virulence-associated factors and the ability of horizontal gene transfer among bacteria for a better understanding of the pathogenicity and the mechanisms of dissemination of resistant bacteria. Therefore, the objective of this work was to detect several virulence factors genes (fimA, papC, papG III, cnf1, hlyA and aer) and to determine the conjugative capacity in a wide collection of extended-spectrum β-lactamases-producing E. coli isolated from different sources (human, food, farms, rivers, and wastewater treatment plants). Regarding virulence genes, fimA, papC, and aer were distributed throughout all the studied environments, papG III was mostly related to clinical strains and wastewater is a route of dissemination for cnf1 and hlyA. Strains isolated from aquatic environments showed an average conjugation frequencies of 1.15 × 10-1 ± 5 × 10-1, being significantly higher than those observed in strains isolated from farms and food (p < 0.05), with frequencies of 1.53 × 10-4 ± 2.85 × 10-4 and 9.61 × 10-4 ± 1.96 × 10-3, respectively. The reported data suggest the importance that the aquatic environment (especially WWTPs) acquires for the exchange of genes and the dispersion of resistance. Therefore, specific surveillance programs of AMR indicators in wastewaters from animal or human origin are needed, in order to apply sanitation measures to reduce the burden of resistant bacteria arriving to risky environments as WWTPs.Entities:
Keywords: ESBL; antibiotic resistance; horizontal gene transfer; virulence factor; wastewater
Year: 2020 PMID: 32326434 PMCID: PMC7232254 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8040568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Primers and conditions used for the amplification of virulence factors genes.
| Target | Primer | Sequence (5′-3′) | Size (bp) | T (°C) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| fimA-Fw | GTTGTTCTGTCGGCTCTGTC | 447 | 55 | [ |
| fimA-Rv | ATGGTGTTGGTTCCGTTATTC | ||||
| papG-Fw | CATTTATCGTCCTCAACTTAG | 482 | 55 | [ | |
| papG-Rv | AAGAAGGGATTTTGTAGCGTC | ||||
|
| papC-Rw | GACGGCTGTACTGCAGGGTGTGGCG | 382 | 63 | [ |
| papC-Rv | ATATCCTTTCTGCAGGGATGCAATA | ||||
|
| aer-Fw | TACCGGATTGTCATATGCAGACCGT | 602 | 63 | [ |
| aer-Rv | AATATCTTCCTCCAGTCCGGAGAAG | ||||
|
| hlyA-Fw | AACAAGGATAAGCACTGTTCTGGCT | 1117 | 63 | [ |
| hlyA-Rv | ACCATATAAGCGGTCATTCCCGTCA | ||||
|
| cnfI-Fw | AAGATGGAGTTTCCTATGCAGGAG | 498 | 63 | [ |
| cnfI-Rv | CATTCAGAGTCCTGCCCTCATTATT |
Prevalence of virulence-associated genes among extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli from different sources.
| Gene | Number of Isolates (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Cases | Healthy Volunteers | Food Products | Farms and Feed | Rivers and WWTPs | Total | |
|
| 36 (100) a | 13 (100) | 48 (100) b | 17 (85) a,b | 32 (97) | 146 (97.3) |
|
| 4 (11.1) | 0 | 2 (4.1) | 0 | 0 | 6 (4) |
|
| 30 (83.3) c,d | 13 (100) g,i | 24 (50) d,e,h,i | 18 (90) f,h | 5 (15.2) c,e,f,g | 90 (60) |
|
| 33 (91.6) j,k,l | 9 (69.2) l | 28 (58.3) k | 15 (75) | 23 (69.7) j | 108 (72) |
|
| 2 (5.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3) | 3 (2) |
|
| 5 (13.8) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (9) | 8 (5.3) |
a–l: Same letters represents statistically significant values (p < 0.05) between these groups.
Figure 1The co-occurrence (percentages) of several virulence factors (VFs) in ESBL-producing E. coli.
Distribution of virulence genes among phylogenetic groups of ESBL-producing E. coli.
| VF | Number of Isolates (% of Total) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | A | B1 | B2 | D | C | F | Clade I | Unknown | |
| ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ( | ||
| Adhesins |
| 43 (97.7) | 27 (100) | 28 (93.3) | 35 (97.2) | 3 (100) | 6 (100) | 1 (100) | 3 (100) |
|
| 24 (54.4) | 16 (59.3) | 25 (83.3) | 21 (58.3) | 2 (66.6) | 1 (16.6) | - | 1 (33.3) | |
|
| 2 (4.5) | 1 (3.7) | 1 (3.3) | 2 (5.5) | - | - | - | - | |
| Siderophore |
| 25 (56.8) | 17 (63) | 24 (80) | 32 (88.8) | 3 (100) | 6 (100) | - | 1 (33.3) |
| Toxins |
| - | 1 (3.7) | 2 (6.6) | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| 1 (2.27) | 1 (3.7) | 2 (6.6) | 4 (11.1) | - | - | - | - | |
Figure 2Multidimensional scaling graphs (MDS) for the 150 strains. (A) According to origin; (B) hlyA positive and negative strains (C) cnf1 positive and negative strains.
Conjugation frequencies of ESBL-producing E. coli according to their origin.
| Origin | Conjugation Frequency Average ± Sd | Conjugation Frequency Range |
|---|---|---|
| Rivers and WWTPs | 1.15 × 10−1 ± 5 × 10−1 | 2.35–3.37 × 10−6 |
| Healthy volunteers | 3.38 × 10−2 ± 4.20 × 10−2 | 4.81× 10−2–2.28 × 10−6 |
| Clinical cases | 2.64 × 10−3 ± 5.82 × 10−3 | 1.19 × 10−2–9.08 × 10−7 |
| Farms and feeds | 1.53 × 10−4 ± 2.85 × 10−4 | 1.03 × 10−4–9.14 × 10−7 |
| Food products | 9.61 × 10−4 ± 1.96 × 10−3 | 1.16 × 10−3–3.59 × 10−7 |
Figure 3Multidimensional scaling graphs (MDS) for the 18 isolates B2, tested in the conjugation assays; (A) According to the distribution by origins; (B) MLST types; (C) Conjugation frequency ranges of these strains, and (D) Prevalence of papC genes.
Figure 4PCRs for the ESBL genes detection in transconjugants. (A) Presence of TEM-1 gene. 1: 1F; 2: 2F; 3: 3F; 4: 1R. 5-6: C + TEM-1; 7: C−; 8: 1Kb plus ladder. (B) Presence of CTX-M 1 and CTX-M9. 1: Kb plus ladder; 2: 1F; 3: 2F; 4: 2R; 5: 1W; 6: 2W. 7: C + CTX-M1; 8-9: C + CTX-M9; 10: C−.
Figure 5Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of the 70 isolates tested in the conjugation assays. Red coloured boxes indicate the riskiest condition, according to the legend.