| Literature DB >> 32326398 |
Yahua Bi1, Sooyoung Choi1, Insin Kim1.
Abstract
Environmental issues (i.e., food safety and environmental pollution) have increased concerns about individuals' health as well as global environment. These concerns drive awareness for the influences of healthy foods, and eventually lead them to visit healthy food exhibitions. This research aims to understand the attendees' motives for participating in a healthy food exhibition. Specific objectives are to identify crucial visitors' motives influencing satisfaction with the healthy food exhibition and to verify whether visitors' satisfaction with the exhibition enhances their memory for the experience in the exhibition. The survey was conducted by targeting visitors who participated in the Busan International Food Expo, and the data collected from 363 attendees were analyzed using the SPSS and AMOS statistical programs. The analysis results revealed that three dimensions of healthy food exhibition motives, namely perceived healthiness, perceived hedonism and perceived food safety, increase visitors' satisfaction with the healthy food exhibition, and that satisfaction with the healthy food exhibition further had a positive impact on the visitors' memory for the exhibition experience.Entities:
Keywords: memory; satisfaction with the healthy food exhibition; visitor’s motives
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32326398 PMCID: PMC7215487 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17082703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Summary of constructs of the motives for healthy food consumption in previous research.
| Study | Research Context | Proposed Construct | Outcome Variable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bauer, Heinrich, and Schäfer [ | Organic food brand purchase decision, compared to non-organic food brand, among German food consumers | Perceived healthiness | Organic food purchase intention |
| Hansen, Sørensen, and Eriksen [ | Organic food consumption motivations influenced by personal values among Danish food consumers | Health consciousness | Organic food identity |
| Hwang [ | Relative importance of organic food buying motives among U.S. older food consumers | Self-presentation | Organic food purchase intention |
| Teng and Lu [ | Organic food consumption motives in Taiwanese food consumers | Health consciousness | Involvement in organic food |
Figure 1The research model.
Figure 2The pictures of the 22nd Busan International Food Expo.
Profile of respondents.
| Characteristics | Categories | Frequency (N) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 226 | 62.3 |
| Female | 137 | 37.7 | |
| Age | Under 20 | 28 | 7.7 |
| 20s | 167 | 46.0 | |
| 30s | 60 | 16.5 | |
| 40s | 32 | 8.8 | |
| 50s | 45 | 12.4 | |
| Older than 60 | 31 | 8.6 | |
| Level of Education | Some high school | 11 | 3.0 |
| High school graduate | 67 | 18.5 | |
| College graduate | 85 | 23.4 | |
| University graduate | 170 | 46.8 | |
| Post-graduate | 30 | 8.3 | |
| Occupation | Students | 126 | 34.7 |
| Housewives | 40 | 11.0 | |
| Office workers | 90 | 24.8 | |
| Self-employed | 31 | 8.5 | |
| Professionals | 27 | 7.5 | |
| Others | 49 | 13.5 |
Normal distribution tests.
| Constructs | Items | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived healthiness | The consumption of products in this exhibition enhances my health. | 3.342 | 0.827 | −0.001 | −0.192 |
| I believe that this exhibition enables me to live healthily. | 3.405 | 0.800 | 0.053 | −0.128 | |
| I am of the view that the consumption of products in this exhibition has a health-promoting effect. | 3.416 | 0.780 | 0.036 | −0.039 | |
| This exhibition and a health-conscious lifestyle match well. | 3.383 | 0.834 | −0.156 | 0.561 | |
| Perceived hedonism | By participating in this exhibition, I can pamper myself. | 3.240 | 0.831 | 0.252 | −0.051 |
| I can indulge myself by participating in this exhibition. | 3.477 | 0.832 | −0.070 | −0.278 | |
| Participating in this exhibition can affect my well-being positively. | 3.383 | 0.844 | −0.016 | −0.113 | |
| It is a pleasure to participating in this exhibition. | 3.537 | 0.864 | −0.115 | −0.271 | |
| Perceived environmental friendliness | The production of this exhibition goes easy on resources. | 3.231 | 0.791 | 0.136 | 0.200 |
| I am of the opinion that during this exhibition the environment is highly valued. | 3.218 | 0.824 | 0.143 | −0.032 | |
| The products in this exhibition are environmentally friendly. | 3.339 | 0.816 | 0.069 | 0.221 | |
| This exhibition and environmentalism match well. | 3.176 | 0.832 | 0.180 | 0.187 | |
| Perceived | I feel that the food presented in this exhibition is free of chemical residues. | 3.457 | 0.870 | −0.045 | −0.449 |
| I am of the opinion that the food presented in this exhibition is not contaminated. | 3.410 | 0.772 | −0.132 | −0.083 | |
| The food ingredients presented in this exhibition are pesticide-free. | 3.507 | 0.784 | 0.081 | −0.412 | |
| I believe that the food presented in this exhibition features high food safety. | 3.460 | 0.787 | −0.056 | −0.081 | |
| Satisfaction | Overall, I am satisfied with this exhibition. | 3.526 | 0.798 | −0.217 | 0.244 |
| I am happy with attending this exhibition. | 3.410 | 0.863 | 0.033 | −0.298 | |
| I believe I did the right thing when I visited this exhibition. | 3.625 | 0.826 | −0.302 | 0.032 | |
| Memory | I will have wonderful memories of this exhibition. | 3.504 | 0.935 | −0.165 | −0.338 |
| I will remember many positive things about this exhibition. | 3.590 | 0.876 | −0.263 | −0.035 | |
| I will not forget my experience at this exhibition. | 3.471 | 0.883 | −0.129 | −0.065 |
Note: SD = standard deviation.
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA): items and loadings.
| Items | Loading | AVE |
|---|---|---|
| Perceived healthiness | 0.716 | |
| The consumption of products in this exhibition enhances my health. | 0.790 | |
| I believe that this exhibition enables me to live healthily. | 0.884 | |
| I am of the view that the consumption of products in this exhibition has a health-promoting effect. | 0.861 | |
| This exhibition and a health-conscious lifestyle match well. | 0.847 | |
| Perceived hedonism | 0.572 | |
| By participating in this exhibition, I can pamper myself. | 0.733 | |
| I can indulge myself by participating in this exhibition. | 0.759 | |
| Participating in this exhibition can affect my well-being positively. | 0.817 | |
| It is a pleasure to participating in this exhibition. | 0.714 | |
| Perceived environmental friendliness | 0.692 | |
| The production of this exhibition goes easy on resources. | 0.793 | |
| I am of the opinion that during this exhibition the environment is highly valued. | 0.827 | |
| The products in this exhibition are environmentally friendly. | 0.856 | |
| This exhibition and environmentalism match well. | 0.852 | |
| Perceived food safety | 0.634 | |
| I feel that the food presented in this exhibition is free of chemical residues. | 0.753 | |
| I am of the opinion that the food presented in this exhibition is not contaminated. | 0.821 | |
| The food ingredients presented in this exhibition are pesticide-free. | 0.829 | |
| I believe that the food presented in this exhibition features high food safety. | 0.782 | |
| Satisfaction | 0.675 | |
| Overall, I am satisfied with this exhibition. | 0.857 | |
| I am happy with attending this exhibition. | 0.865 | |
| I believe I did the right thing when I visited this exhibition. | 0.865 | |
| Memory | 0.657 | |
| I will have wonderful memories of this exhibition. | 0.930 | |
| I will remember many positive things about this exhibition. | 0.917 | |
| I will not forget my experience at this exhibition. | 0.841 |
Notes: All factor loadings were significant at p < 0.001; AVE = average variance extracted.
Descriptive statistics and associated measures.
| Construct | Mean | SD | CR | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Perceived | 3.386 | 0.717 | 0.938 | 1.00 | |||||
|
| Perceived | 3.409 | 0.693 | 0.882 | 0.811 | 1.00 | ||||
|
| Perceived | 3.241 | 0.715 | 0.931 | 0.663 | 0.731 | 1.00 | |||
|
| Perceived | 3.458 | 0.683 | 0.914 | 0.598 | 0.612 | 0.740 | 1.00 | ||
|
| Satisfaction | 3.520 | 0.755 | 0.897 | 0.722 | 0.806 | 0.665 | 0.610 | 1.00 | |
|
| Memory | 3.521 | 0.836 | 0.904 | 0.658 | 0.714 | 0.618 | 0.558 | 0.771 | 1.00 |
Note: SD = standard deviation; CR = composite reliability; Squared correlations are in parentheses.
Standardized coefficients.
| Paths | Standardized Estimate | Support | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived healthiness | → | Satisfaction | 0.160 | 2.027 * | Support |
| Perceived hedonism | → | Satisfaction | 0.561 | 5.701 ** | Support |
| Perceived environmental friendliness | → | Satisfaction | 0.065 | 0.848 | Not support |
| Perceived food safety | → | Satisfaction | 0.140 | 2.175 * | Support |
| Satisfaction | → | Memory | 0.796 | 16.552 ** | Support |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.