| Literature DB >> 32326077 |
Nobukazu Miyamoto1, Yuji Ueno1, Kenichiro Hira1, Chikage Kijima1, Sho Nakajima1, Kazuo Yamashiro1, Nobutaka Hattori1.
Abstract
Cerebral artery fenestration is a rare variant of the vascular architecture, but its existence is well documented. The common site of fenestration is the vertebra-basilar artery and it may be found incidentally with subarachnoid hemorrhage. However, fenestration-related cerebral infarction is rare. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, stroke etiology, and image findings of fenestration-related cerebral infarction of the vertebrobasilar artery. We reviewed our hospital records and previously published reports to find cases of fenestration-related cerebral infarction. We excluded those with unknown clinical features or radiological findings. We retrieved 4 cases of fenestration-related infarction from our hospital, in which vascular change, headache, vertigo/dizziness, and dissection in stroke etiology were detected. In eight previously reported cases of fenestration-related infarction, similar vascular changes were noted, but they were mainly diagnosed as embolic stroke of undetermined source. However, based on the criteria for dissection in this study, dissection as the stroke etiology was suspected in the previously reported cases. Many hypotheses have been proposed for the development of dissection, thrombus, and aneurysms in fenestration. Although an embryological and morphological study is needed, clinicians must consider basilar artery fenestration-related infarction as a differential diagnosis and intensive non-invasive image study is recommended.Entities:
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); basi-parallel anatomic scanning magnetic resonance imaging (BPAS); cerebral infarction; dissection; embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS); fenestration
Year: 2020 PMID: 32326077 PMCID: PMC7226259 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci10040243
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Sci ISSN: 2076-3425
Clinical features, vascular risk factors and radiological findings of vertebra-basilar artery-related infarction.
| Author (et al.) | Age | Sex | Stroke Etiology | Fenestration Classification | Headache | Infarct Area | Findings Suggesting Dissection on MRA | Intramural Hematoma on T1WI | D-Dimer (μg/mL) | Hypertension | Dyslipidemia | Diabetes | Atrial Filiation | Related Injury | Worsening | Vertigo/Dizziness | Ataxia | Weakness | Dysesthesia | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| String | Pearl | Double Lumen | Shape Change | |||||||||||||||||||
| Case 1 | 71 | F | D | I | + | pons, cerebellar | + | - | - | + | - | 2.1 | + | + | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| Case 2 | 74 | M | D | III | + | Medulla PICA | + | - | - | + | + | <1.0 | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| Case 3 | 61 | M | D | III | - | cerebellar | + | - | - | + | - | 1.1 | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - |
| Case 4 | 71 | M | D | I | + | medulla | + | - | - | + | + | 1.5 | + | + | - | + | - | - | + | - | + | + |
| Bernard [ | 18 | M | D | (VA) | + | cerebellar | + | + | - | + | NA | NA | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - | - |
| Gold [ | 12 | M | E | II | - | cerebellar | - | - | - | NA | NA | NA | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| Kloska [ | 5 | M | E | I | + | pons | + | - | - | + | NA | NA | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - |
| Meinnel [ | 76 | M | E | IV | - | pons | + | - | - | + | NA | NA | + | + | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| Palazzo [ | 56 | M | E | I | - | cerebellar posterior lobe | + | - | - | + | NA | NA | + | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| Wu [ | 36 | M | E | IV | - | Cerebellar (vermis) | - | - | - | + | NA | NA | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | + | - | - |
| Yamaguchi [ | 45 | M | C | (VA) | - | Pons cerebellar | + | - | - | + | NA | NA | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | - | - |
| Yamamoto [ | 30 | M | E | (VA) | + | midbrain | + | - | - | + | NA | <1.0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | + | - | + | + |
NA; not applicable, MRA; magnetic resonance angiography, D; dissection, C; compression, E; embolic stroke of undetermined source, PICA; posterior inferior cerebellar artery.
Figure 1Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of our cases on diffusion weighted image (DWI; A, F, J, O), T1WI (for intramural hematoma; B, G, K, P), basi-parallel anatomic scanning magnetic resonance imaging (BPAS; C, L, Q) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA, onset; D, H, M, R, follow-up; E, I, N, S). Case 1; Acute infarction at the left cerebellum and dorsal pons (A; arrow), but no intramural hematoma. The left vertebral artery was observed on BPAS (C; arrow), but not on MRA (D; arrow). On follow-up MRA, the left vertebral artery was observed (E; arrow). Case 2; Acute infarction was observed in the lateral medulla and cerebellum (F; arrow). Intramural hematoma was noted at the left vertebral artery (G; arrow). On initial MRA, string sign was seen in the left vertebral artery (H; arrow). On follow-up MRA, the left vertebral artery was visualized (I; arrow). Case 3; Dotted acute infarction was noted in the right cerebellum (J; arrow), but there was no intramural hematoma (K). On BPAS and MRA, the right fenestrated artery and vertebral artery were string-shaped (L, M; arrow). On follow-up MRA, the right fenestrated artery and vertebral artery were visualized more clearly. Case 4; Acute infarction was observed at the dorsal lateral medulla (O; arrow) and intramural hematoma was present at the left fenestrated artery (P; arrow). On BPAS, the basilar artery was fenestrated (Q; arrow), but the left fenestrated artery disappeared on initial MRA (R; arrow). On follow-up MRA, the left fenestrated artery reappeared (S; arrow).