| Literature DB >> 32325936 |
Asem Elabasy1,2, Ali Shoaib1,2, Muhammad Waqas1, Zuhua Shi1, Mingxing Jiang1.
Abstract
Using smart nanopesticide formulations based on nanomaterials can offer promising potential applications for decreasing pesticide residues and their effects on human health and the environment. In this study, a novel nanoformulation (NF) of thiamethoxam (TMX) was fabricated using the solvent evaporation method through loading TMX on cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) as the carrier. The synthesized TMX-CNCs was investigated through different techniques, such as Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The results revealed that the loading efficiency and entrapment efficiency were 18.7% and 83.7 ± 1.8% for TMX, respectively. The prepared nanoformulation (TMX-CNCs) had a width of 7-14 nm and a length of 85-214 nm with a zeta potential of -23.6 ± 0.3 mV. The drug release behavior study exhibited that the release of TMX from TMX-loaded CNCs was good and sustained. Furthermore, bioassay results showed that the insecticidal activity of TMX-CNCs against Phenacoccus solenopsis was significantly superior to that of the technical and commercial formulation, as indicated by the lower LC50 value. The results indicate that the TMX nanoformulation has great potential for application in agriculture for pest control.Entities:
Keywords: Phenacoccus solenopsis; cellulose nanocrystals; insecticidal activity; thiamethoxam
Year: 2020 PMID: 32325936 PMCID: PMC7221987 DOI: 10.3390/nano10040788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Chemical structure of Thiamethoxam.
Figure 2Schematic description of the preparation of the thiamethoxam (TMX)-loaded cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs).
Dynamic light scattering (DLS)/Zeta potential of CNCs and TMX-loaded CNCs (mean ± SD, ).
| Sample | Nanoformulation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ζ (mV) a | Size (nm) | PdI b | EE (%) c | |
| CNCs | −39.0 ± 1.8 | 124.5 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | - |
| TMX-CNCs | −23.6 ± 0.3 | 798.0 ± 149 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | 83.7 ± 1.8 |
a Zeta potential, b Polydispersity Index, c Entrapment Efficiency.
Figure 3Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of (a) TMX, (b) CNCs, and (c) nanoformulation (TMX-CNCs).
Figure 4X-ray Diffraction (XRD) patterns of CNCs.
Figure 5Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of (a) CNCs and (b) TMX-CNCs.
Figure 6Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) curves for CNCs, TMX-CNCs and TMX.
Figure 7Release rate % of TMX from TMX-loaded CNCs in phosphate buffer solution (pH 7.4). Errors bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3).
Toxicity of TMX formulations against the second instar nymphs of P. solenopsis.
| Formulation | Time (h) | LC50 (95% CL, µg/mL) | Slope ± SE | χ2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMX-CNCs | 24 | 0.70 (0.60–0.85) | 3.34 ± 0.60 | 2.63 |
| 48 | 0.37 (0.24–0.48) | 1.88 ± 0.44 | 2.35 | |
| 72 | 0.25 (0.11–0.35) | 1.75 ± 0.44 | 2.96 | |
| TMX (TC) | 24 | 0.91 (0.51–1.83) | 0.89 ± 0.25 | 0.19 |
| 48 | 0.44 (0.15–0.78) | 0.85 ± 0.25 | 0.12 | |
| 72 | 0.28 (0.10–0.45) | 1.09 ± 0.27 | 1.83 | |
| TMX 25% WDG | 24 | 2.11 (1.60–3.71) | 1.80 ± 0.47 | 1.45 |
| 48 | 1.02 (0.53–1.47) | 1.34 ± 0.42 | 0.77 | |
| 72 | 0.55 (0.15–0.83) | 1.45 ± 0.44 | 1.12 |