Literature DB >> 32325585

Knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior related to green infrastructure for flood management: A systematic literature review.

Vidya Venkataramanan1, Denise Lopez2, David J McCuskey3, Daniel Kiefus4, Robert I McDonald5, William M Miller6, Aaron I Packman7, Sera L Young8.   

Abstract

Green infrastructure (GI), which mimics natural hydrological systems, is a promising solution for flood management at the intersection of urban built infrastructure and natural systems. However, it has not yet achieved widespread uptake, due in part to insufficient understanding of human dimensions of the broader socio-ecological-technical system. We therefore conducted a multidisciplinary systematic literature review to synthesize research on people's existing knowledge about flood risk and GI, and how that shapes their attitudes and motivation to adopt new solutions. We systematically screened 21,207 studies on GI for flood management; 85 met our inclusion criteria. We qualitatively analyzed these studies to extract results on knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior relating to GI for flood management. Overall, knowledge of GI was low across the 44 studies in which it was evaluated. Seventy studies assessed attitudes about GI, including the functional, aesthetic, health and safety, recreational, conservation, financial, and cultural value of GI, albeit their measurement was inconsistent. Willingness to implement or pay for GI varied considerably across 55 studies in which it was measured. Twenty studies measured and documented behavior relating to GI use, and these found low rates of adoption. Few studies systematically assessed the role of demographic, socio-economic, or geographic characteristics that could influence individuals' knowledge, attitudes, intentions or behavior, and thereby the success of GI programs. We recommend that researchers should more systematically capture data on human dimensions of GI (i.e. knowledge, attitudes, intentions, and behavior) across diverse settings to improve program design and uptake, especially among vulnerable populations. Greater attention to the social component of the socio-ecological-technical system will help ensure that GI programs are equitable, inclusive, and sustainable.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Knowledge; Nature-based solutions; Perceptions; Social science; Stormwater management; Urban flooding

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325585     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics analysis and optimization prediction of urban green infrastructure: a case study of Beijing, China.

Authors:  Yin Ma; Xinqi Zheng; Menglan Liu; Dongya Liu; Gang Ai; Xueye Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 2.  Community experiences of landscape-based stormwater management practices: A review.

Authors:  Yuanqiu Feng; Joan Nassauer
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.943

3.  Knowledge, Practice, Preferences and Willingness-to-Pay for Mammographic Screening Tests among Iranian Women: A Contingent Valuation Method.

Authors:  Akram Karimabadi; Elahe Pourahmadi; Sadegh Bafandeh Imandoust; Afsane Nikoukar; Mehdi Aryafar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Public preferences for green infrastructure improvements in Northern New Jersey: a discrete choice experiment approach.

Authors:  Taylor Wieczerak; Pankaj Lal; Benjamin Witherell; Sydney Oluoch
Journal:  SN Soc Sci       Date:  2022-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.