Literature DB >> 32325198

Periaortic ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease: Evidence of localized reentrant mechanisms.

Takuro Nishimura1, Andrew D Beaser1, Zaid A Aziz1, Gaurav A Upadhyay1, Cevher Ozcan1, Michael Raiman2, Dalise Y Shatz1, Stephanie A Besser1, Nathan A Shatz2, Hemal M Nayak1, Roderick Tung3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mechanisms for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the periaortic region remain incompletely characterized.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to map the circuits responsible for periaortic VT in high resolution.
METHODS: Cases with periaortic VT (2016-2020) were analyzed to characterize the substrate and mechanisms with multielectrode mapping. Periaortic VT was defined as low-voltage and/or deceleration zones within 2 cm of the left ventriculoaortic junction with a corresponding critical site during VT.
RESULTS: Forty-nine periaortic monomorphic VTs were analyzed in 30 patients (25% of all patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy). Isolated periaortic substrate was observed in 27% of patients, with 73% having concomitant scar, most commonly in the mid-septum (47%). Deceleration zones were equally prevalent on the septal and lateral portions of the periaortic region (87% vs 73%; P = .19). During activation mapping of VT (tachycardia cycle length 392 ± 105 ms), localized reentrant patterns of activation (14 mm [10-17 mm] × 10 mm [7-14 mm]) were demonstrated in 63% and 37% of VTs showed centrifugal activation, consistent with a focal breakout pattern. Ninety-three percent of VTs fulfilled criteria for a reentrant mechanism. Sixty-five percent of reentrant circuits had endocardial activation gaps within the tachycardia cycle length (3-dimensional circuitry), which were associated with higher rates of recurrence as compared with 2-dimensional complete circuits at 1 year (73% vs 37%; P = .028).
CONCLUSION: Periaortic VTs were observed in 25% of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and scar-related VT. For the first time, localized reentry confined to this anatomically challenging region was demonstrated as the predominant mechanism by high-resolution circuit activation mapping.
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter ablation; High-resolution mapping; Periaortic VT; Reentry

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325198     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance septal late gadolinium enhancement patterns for periaortic ventricular tachycardia ablation: Heterogeneity of the anteroseptal substrate in nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Takuro Nishimura; Hena N Patel; Shuo Wang; Gaurav A Upadhyay; Heather L Smith; Cevher Ozcan; Dalise Y Shatz; Hemal M Nayak; Amit R Patel; Roderick Tung
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Impact on Practice with the Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter, Sensor Enabled™.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2021-01-15

3.  Incidence of outflow tract ventricular tachycardia long after surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Kentaro Goto; Yuichi Ono; Yuki Osaka; Hidetsugu Nomoto; Toru Miyazaki; Asami Suzuki; Ken Kurihara; Takeshi Someya; Yoshihide Takahashi; Kenichiro Otomo; Masahiko Goya; Tetsuo Sasano
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  An Unusual Electrogram Sequence with a Questionable Potential on the His-bundle Catheter During Sinus Rhythm: What Is the Mechanism?

Authors:  Ahmet Lutfu Sertdemir; Meryem Kara; Serdal Bastug; Bulent Deveci; Ahmet Korkmaz; Ozcan Ozeke; Serkan Cay; Firat Ozcan; Serkan Topaloglu; Dursun Aras
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.