Literature DB >> 32325097

Vicarious traumatization: A psychological problem that cannot be ignored during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Zhenyu Li1, Jingwu Ge1, Meiling Yang1, Jianping Feng1, Cunming Liu2, Chun Yang3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Psychological problem; Vicarious traumatization

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32325097      PMCID: PMC7167587          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Immun        ISSN: 0889-1591            Impact factor:   7.217


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor: Many thanks for the comments and suggestions on our recently published study entitled “Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control” (Li et al., 2020). Until now, more than two million Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) patients have been confirmed around the world. It is well recognized that the psychological status in medical staff and general public cannot be ignored. Our study was performed during the outbreak of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan. Approximately 42,000 medical staff supported the control of COVID-19 in Wuhan from the rest of China. A correspondence mentioned that our study adopted the mobile app-based questionnaire and pushed it to individuals via WeChat, probably causing a bias of the enrolled individuals (Joob and Wiwanitkit, 2020). The main reason is that the strict isolation for stopping human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus did not allow us to perform large-scale and face-to-face studies during the COVID-19 outbreak. The major objective of our study is to remind psychological and psychiatric experts to pay more attentions to the vicarious traumatization in medical staff and general public during the outbreak of COVID-19. A correspondence mentioned that the groups enrolled in this study did not remove confounding factors (Ghaffari et al., 2020). The main reason is that the enrolled front-line nurses from all over the country were middle-level backbone staff with rich work experience and psychological capacity. In addition, the current form of our research is short communication. Due to the space limitation, we failed to show more data, such as the result of regression analysis. Our research was a cross-sectional study and found that the vicarious traumatization of non-front-line medical staff was more serious than that of front-line medical staff during the COVID-19 outbreak. It is noteworthy that the evolution of psychological problems is a developmental process. After short-term medical support work for COVID-19 control, the effects of various psychological stressors may be strengthened, and psychological problems will gradually emerge. The onset of psychological crisis is commonly 3 months after the end of medical support work, and its peak is approximately 6 months later (Hsiao et al., 2020). Therefore, even though the COVID-19 epidemic is over, it is of great importance to continue tracking the development of vicarious traumatization in medical staff as well as the general public.
  8 in total

1.  Role and importance of consultation-liaison psychiatry during the Covid-19 epidemic.

Authors:  Mathilde Horn; Benoit Granon; Guillaume Vaiva; Thomas Fovet; Ali Amad
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Would we recover better sleep at the end of Covid-19? A relative improvement observed at the population level with the end of the lockdown in France.

Authors:  Francois Beck; Damien Leger; Sebastien Cortaredona; Pierre Verger; Patrick Peretti-Watel
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 3.492

Review 3.  The three frontlines against COVID-19: Brain, Behavior, and Immunity.

Authors:  Shao-Cheng Wang; Kuan-Pin Su; Carmine M Pariante
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.217

4.  Prevalence and its associated factors of depressive symptoms among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Mingli Yu; Fangqiong Tian; Qi Cui; Hui Wu
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.630

5.  The correlation between professional quality of life and mental health outcomes among hospital personnel during the Covid-19 pandemic in Taiwan.

Authors:  Po-An Su; Mu-Chen Lo; Chiao-Ling Wang; Ping-Chen Yang; Chiao-I Chang; Meng-Chuan Huang; Ming-Kuo Huang; Kuang-I Cheng
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  COVID-19 vicarious traumatization links functional connectome to general distress.

Authors:  Xueling Suo; Chao Zuo; Huan Lan; Nanfang Pan; Xun Zhang; Graham J Kemp; Song Wang; Qiyong Gong
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 7.400

7.  Assessment of Psychosocial Functioning of Polish Nurses during COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Kamila Rachubińska; Anna Maria Cybulska; Joanna Sołek-Pastuszka; Mariusz Panczyk; Marzanna Stanisławska; Przemysław Ustianowski; Elżbieta Grochans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Professional Quality of Life and Perceived Stress in Health Professionals before COVID-19 in Spain: Primary and Hospital Care.

Authors:  Ángela María Ortega-Galán; María Dolores Ruiz-Fernández; María-Jesús Lirola; Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo; Olivia Ibáñez-Masero; José Cabrera-Troya; Virginia Salinas-Pérez; Piedras Alba Gómez-Beltrán; Elia Fernández-Martínez
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.