| Literature DB >> 32324793 |
G Girgis1, M Powell1, M Youssef1, D E Graugnard2, W D King2, K A Dawson2.
Abstract
Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) has been the most common Salmonella serotype associated with foodborne infections in the last several years. Dietary applications of yeast-based preparations in feed have shown to reduce Salmonella colonization in chickens augmenting SE control strategies. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of a mannan-rich yeast cell wall-derived preparation (Actigen®) administered in feed at a rate of 400 g/ton on SE colonization in the cecum and internal organs of commercial layer chickens. Sixteen week-old layer pullets were orally challenged with a selected nalidixic acid resistant SE strain at a dose of 1.7×10^9 colony forming units (CFU) per bird. SE colonization was assessed by evaluating isolation rates from ovary and pooled liver/spleen samples as well as enumeration of SE in cecal pouches one week post-challenge. Recovery rates of SE from the ovaries of directly challenged birds receiving Actigen® were significantly lower (P <0.02) than those in directly challenged birds fed an unsupplemented control diet. Recovery rates of SE from pooled liver/spleen samples were not significantly different between Actigen®-treated pullets and controls (P = 0.22). Using direct plate count methods, cecal SE concentrations were 1 log10 lower (P <0.001) in challenged pullets in the Actigen®-supplemented group than in the challenged controls. The SE concentration distributions in the ceca were similar in groups testing positive and groups testing negative for SE in the ovaries and liver/spleens tissues. As a result, SE concentrations in the ceca could not be directly related to the occurrence or prevalence of SE in these tissues. In conclusion, Actigen® supplementation appears to decrease the prevalence of SE in ovarian tissue and concentrations of SE in cecal contents and may be useful as a tool for reducing the risk of eggshell contamination and transovarian transmission of SE in eggs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32324793 PMCID: PMC7179919 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Effects of a mannan-rich yeast cell wall dietary supplement on the detected frequency of nalidixic acid resistant Salmonella Enteritidis in the tissue samples from 17-week-old layers 1 week after direct or contact challenge.
| Actigen® | Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tissue | Direct Challenge | Contact Challenge | Direct Challenge | Contact Challenge |
| Cecum | 46/46 (100%)a | 15/46 (32.6%)b | 46/46 (100%)a | 16/46 (34.8%)b |
| Ovary | 13/46 (28.3%)b | 2/46 (4.3%)c | 23/46 (50%)a | 3/46 (6.5%)c |
| Liver and Spleen | 43/46 (93.4%)a | 10/46 (21.7%)b | 41/46 (89.1%)a | 12/46 (26.1%)b |
Values represent the number of Salmonella positive birds/total number of birds tested. Numbers in parenthesis represent the percentage of positive birds. Values with different superscripts within a row are significantly different (P < 0.02).
Fig 1Box plot of the mean concentrations (log10 CFU/g) of Salmonella in cecal contents from 17 week-old layers 1 week after a direct or contact challenge with S. Enteritidis as influenced by dietary treatment (46/treatment).
The boxes represent mean and standard deviation values. Birds were fed either basal diet (Control) or a diet supplemented with 400 g of Actigen®/ton from day of hatch through week 17. Direct challenged birds were challenge on week 16 with 1.7 X 109 CFU of nalidixic acid resistant S. Enteritidis. Contact challenged birds were exposed to S. Enteritidis by housing them in the same cage as the direct challenged birds. The mean concentrations (log10 CFU/g) of Salmonella in the ceca of the direct challenged birds were 2.9±0.8 and 3.9±0.6 for the Actigen® and Control groups, respectively. The mean concentration of salmonella in the ceca from contact challenged birds were 0.6±0.6 and 0.7±0.6 for the Actigen® and control groups, respectively. Means designated by different letters (a, b and c) are significantly different (P < 0.001).
Fig 2Cecal Salmonella concentration (log10 CFU/g) distributions in Salmonella positive and negative samples from the ovary and liver/spleen of 17 week-old layers 1 week after direct challenge with S. Enteritidis.
The bar graphs show the frequency of each concentration range while the red line shows the normal distribution curve based on the observed concentration. Detection was based on the occurrence of Salmonella in the tissue as determined by growth after plating on XLT-4 agar plates containing 25μg of nalidixic acid/mL. μ represents the mean log10 concentration ± the standard deviation.