Wojciech Danowski1, Fabio Castiglioni2, Andy S Sardjan3, Simon Krause1, Lukas Pfeifer1, Diederik Roke1, Angiolina Comotti2, Wesley R Browne1,3, Ben L Feringa1. 1. Centre for Systems Chemistry, Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Materials Science, University of Milano Bicocca, Via R. Cozzi 55, 20125 Milan, Italy. 3. Molecular Inorganic Chemistry Group, Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Nijenborgh 4, 9747AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
The visible-light-driven rotation of an overcrowded alkene-based molecular motor strut in a dual-function metal-organic framework (MOF) is reported. Two types of functional linkers, a palladium-porphyrin photosensitizer and a bispyridine-derived molecular motor, were used to construct the framework capable of harvesting low-energy green light to power the rotary motion. The molecular motor was introduced in the framework using the postsynthetic solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) method, and the structure of the material was confirmed by powder (PXRD) and single-crystal X-ray (SC-XRD) diffraction. The large decrease in the phosphorescence lifetime and intensity of the porphyrin in the MOFs upon introduction of the molecular motor pillars confirms efficient triplet-to-triplet energy transfer between the porphyrin linkers and the molecular motor. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy revealed that the visible light-driven rotation of the molecular motor proceeds in the solid state at rates similar to those observed in solution.
The visible-light-driven rotation of an overcrowded alkene-based molecular motor strut in a dual-function metal-organic framework (MOF) is reported. Two types of functional linkers, a palladium-porphyrin photosensitizer and a bispyridine-derived molecular motor, were used to construct the framework capable of harvesting low-energy green light to power the rotary motion. The molecular motor was introduced in the framework using the postsynthetic solvent-assisted linker exchange (SALE) method, and the structure of the material was confirmed by powder (PXRD) and single-crystal X-ray (SC-XRD) diffraction. The large decrease in the phosphorescence lifetime and intensity of the porphyrin in the MOFs upon introduction of the molecular motor pillars confirms efficient triplet-to-triplet energy transfer between the porphyrin linkers and the molecular motor. Near-infrared Raman spectroscopy revealed that the visible light-driven rotation of the molecular motor proceeds in the solid state at rates similar to those observed in solution.
Development of artificial
molecular machines and motors allows
for the design and construction of tailor-made molecular architectures
capable of executing precisely controlled nanoscale structural motion.[1−8] Among these artificial systems, overcrowded alkene-based molecular
motors attract considerable attention due to their chirality controlled
photochemically driven repetitive unidirectional rotary motion.[9−11] Although it has been demonstrated that these molecules can perform
various tasks in solution, such as control over the stereochemical
outcome of catalytic reactions,[12] Brownian
motion precludes the cooperative action required to achieve functions
beyond molecular dimensions.[5,8,13,14] Achieving ensemble action with
artificial molecular machines therefore requires that the randomizing
effects of the thermal motion are eliminated by assembly on surfaces[15−17] or integration into the larger systems.[14] Incorporation and immobilization of these molecules in various supramolecular
architectures, including organo-[18] and
hydrogels,[19,20] polymers,[21,22] liquid crystals,[23−26] or self-assembled monolayers,[15−17] provided a way to amplify and
harness their light-induced rotational motion to form responsive materials
with tunable properties, including adaptive polymers,[21,22,27,28] artificial muscles,[19,20] and responsive surfaces.[29] For overcrowded alkene-based materials the use
of UV light to drive the molecular motion limits such efforts due
to limited penetration depth (due to the scattering) and potential
damage by destructive photochemical processes.[11,30,31] Therefore, development of reliable and practical
visible-light excitation strategies that are compatible with a chosen
material represents a major challenge crucial for further advancement
of these dynamic systems.The most common approaches to red
shifting of the excitation wavelength
of the overcrowded alkene-based molecular motors are based on HOMO–LUMO
gap engineering featuring extension of the aromatic system,[32] functionalization with donor–acceptor
substituents,[33,34] or formation of metal complexes.[35] Although successful, these approaches may reduce
the quantum yield of photoisomerization[32] and are so far limited in the absorption shift (only to the blue
part of the visible spectrum; maximum of absorption ca. 450 nm).[34] Furthermore, the resulting molecular architectures
are synthetically more challenging to incorporate in a given material
scaffold.[32,35,36] An alternative
approach to achieve visible-light-driven rotation of these molecules
is to take advantage of intra- or intermolecular sensitization through
triplet energy transfer from a second chromophore.[37] This strategy not only reduces the synthetic efforts but
also allows one to tune the excitation wavelength over a broad spectral
range limited only by the choice of a photosensitizer and triplet–triplet
energy transfer requirements.[38] Furthermore,
it has been successfully applied to operate several types of photoswitches
by visible light including azobenzenes,[39,40] stilbenes,[41,42] and dithienylethenes.[43,44]Metal–organic
frameworks (MOFs) constitute a class of hybrid
materials composed of inorganic nodes and organic linkers connected
in a three-dimensional crystalline, highly porous network.[45−47] Due to the high inherent porosity in these structures, sufficient
internal free volume is present to allow for stimuli-responsive structural
transformations[48−57] or rotational[58−64] and translational[65] motion of parts of
the organic linkers organized in the crystalline solid. In addition,
the structural diversity and chemical tunability of these materials
makes them ideal platforms to achieve spatial co-organization of functional
molecules[66,67] and chromophores.[68] Recent studies on light-harvesting multicomponent MOFs revealed
that facile and long-distance energy migration can be achieved between
light-absorbing nodes and/or linkers in MOFs of various architectures.[69−72] Furthermore, the incorporation of photochromic dithienylethene struts
in a layered porphyrin MOFs provided a method for photocontrol over
energy transfer between adjacent chromophores and efficiency of singlet
oxygen generation.[73,74]Recently, we demonstrated
that a molecular motor incorporated
as a strut in a pillared-paddlewheel MOF is capable of performing
unhindered, large-amplitude unidirectional rotary motion fueled by
UV light and heat.[75] In the present study,
we show that such rotary motion can be driven by visible light through
linker-to-linker energy transfer. The framework was constructed from
two functional linkers: a porphyrin used as both linker dictating
the connectivity of the framework and light-harvesting unit and a
bispyridyl-derived molecular motor serving as a pillar and able to
undergo rotary motion (Figure ). In the resulting supramolecular architecture the backbone
of the framework is not only a passive “scaffolding”
but also plays an active role by absorbing visible light and transferring
the collected energy to the molecular motor struts, thus driving its
rotary motion. This dual-function MOF was obtained using a postsynthetic
functionalization method from a parent Zn pillared-paddlewheel MOF
bearing a palladium–porphyrintetracarboxylic acid linker (PdTCPP) (Figure , top left) and bispyridyl pillars (Figure , bottom left). The chosen MOF scaffold provides
the proximity of both linkers, allowing for efficient energy transfer
between the chromophores and the large free volume that is essential
for unhindered rotation of the light-driven molecular motor in the
solid state (Figure ). A key challenge, presented by this approach, is in demonstrating
the functioning of the material by spectroscopic methods due to the
overwhelming spectroscopic properties of the porphyrin chromophore.
This unit, which is central to the visible-light-driven functionality,
also precludes standard spectroscopic analysis of the motor function;
however, near-infrared Raman spectroscopy (1064 nm) enables full characterization
of the motor function.
Figure 1
Structures of PdTCPP (left, top) and bispyridyl
molecular
motor 1 (left, bottom) used as linkers for construction
of the MOF framework, and schematic representation of the rotation
of molecular motor 1 incorporated as struts in the motorized
pillared-paddlewheel PdTCPP MOF driven by energy transfer
from a PdTCPP sensitizer (right). Relevant approximate
dimensions of the unit cell are given.
Structures of PdTCPP (left, top) and bispyridyl
molecular
motor 1 (left, bottom) used as linkers for construction
of the MOF framework, and schematic representation of the rotation
of molecular motor 1 incorporated as struts in the motorized
pillared-paddlewheel PdTCPP MOF driven by energy transfer
from a PdTCPP sensitizer (right). Relevant approximate
dimensions of the unit cell are given.
Results
and Discussion
Design, Synthesis, and Characterization of
a Motorized Metal–Organic
Framework
For the desired MOF a zinc pillared-paddlewheel
scaffold was used, related to the framework we reported recently.[75] In the chosen structure, the nodes of the framework,
which is the zinc paddlewheel clusters, are connected by porphyrintetracarboxylic acid linkers (PdTCPP) forming two-dimensional
layers, which are pillared by the bispyridine-derived linker 1 (Figure ). We designed the system in such a way that the size of the PdTCPP linker will ensure sufficient lateral separation of
the pillars bearing a molecular motor function, generating free volume
critical for uncompromised rotation of the molecular motor (in the
designed structure, the distance between the nodes in the [100] and
[010] planes is approximately 17 Å, Figure ). Furthermore, the length of bispyridyl-derived
molecular motor pillar 1 (N–N distance 15.6 Å[75]) should separate the porphyrin layers sufficiently
to prevent competing interlayer porphyrin–porphyrin exciton
transport. Finally, the nodes of the framework were based on closed-shell
d10 configuration Zn2+ cations in order to exclude
any undesired energy transfer between PdTCPP and nodes.
Since MOFs of this topology are typically synthesized under relatively
harsh conditions with the presence of strong mineral acids,[76] it was decided to prepare the final material
using a postsynthetic method, i.e., solvent-assisted linker exchange
(SALE) developed by Farha and Hupp.[77−81] In this process, bispyridine-derived pillars of the
pillared MOFs can be exchanged for different bispyridyl linkers of
similar length under neutral conditions, which prevents side reactions
and decomposition of the acid-sensitive linkers.[77] Furthermore, it was demonstrated that with this method
shorter pillars can also be exchanged for longer pillars, thereby
making this approach suitable for fabrication of MOFs with larger
unit cell parameters.[79] Initial attempts
to grow the desired parent structure with N,N′-di(4-pyridyl)-1,4,5,8-naphthalenetetracarboxydiimide[75] were largely unsuccessful and gave mixtures
of products consisting predominately of interpenetrated frameworks
analogous to the previously described interpenetrated porphyrinic
frameworks.[82,83] To overcome this tendency of
formation of the interpenetrated structure a shorter linker, meso-α,β-di(4-pyridyl) glycol (DPG, see Figure a for
structure), was employed. A novel pillared-paddlewheel framework was
synthesized in a solvothermal reaction between PdTCPP, DPG, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O, and tetrafluoroboric acid in a binary solvent mixture (DMF/EtOH)
providing square-shaped crystals (Figure b, top). It is of note that when the reaction
was carried out under less acidic conditions predominantly needle-like
crystals (Figure S7a) of a 3-fold interpenetrated
framework with zigzag structure were obtained (Figure S7b). Characterization by 1H NMR (d6-DMSO) spectroscopy of the digested (using
D2SO4) square-shaped crystals of the pillared-paddlewheel
MOF showed the expected 1:1 ratio of DPG and PdTCPP linkers (Figures S1 and S2). The initial
refinement of the single-crystal (SC) X-ray diffraction data collected
from the target MOF revealed the expected layered structure composed
of PdTCPP and Zn cations, while the DPG pillars could not be resolved, presumably due to rotational
disorder (Figure S5). Nevertheless, the
interlayer distance of 9.2 Å (N–N distance between pyridylnitrogens coordinated to paddlewheel clusters) determined from the
structure corresponded well with the N–N distance (9.4 Å,
see SI section 13) in the DPG linker, indicating that DPG pillars are intercalating
the layers of the framework (Figure S5).
The powder X-ray diffraction data (PXRD), acquired under solvent-saturated
conditions, corroborated bulk crystallinity and phase purity of the
sample (Figures d
and S8). Furthermore, Pawley refinement
showed negligible differences between the experimental and the simulated
diffraction patterns, further indicating formation of the target
pillared structure (Figures S5 and S9, Table S2). Elemental analysis corroborated the
anticipated elemental composition of the parent MOF (see SI, section 2). Subsequently, the parent DPG pillars were exchanged for bispyridyl molecular motor 1 by means of SALE (Figure a), which was carried out by soaking the crystals of parent
MOF in a DMF solution of bispyridyl molecular motor 1 at 80 °C for 48 h (the solution of 1 was replaced
with a fresh solution after 24 h) to achieve full exchange as indicated
by 1H NMR spectroscopy of digested crystals (Figures b, bottom, S1, and S3). Comparison of the Raman spectra of parent and
motorized PdTCPP MOFs revealed the presence of additional
bands characteristic of molecular motor 1 in the spectrum
of motorized MOF, further supporting the successful exchange of the
pillars (Figure c).
As with the parent MOF, the SC X-ray structure of motorized MOF could
only be partially resolved. From the refinement of the data the PdTCPP units and Zn paddlewheel clusters forming a layered
structure could be confirmed, while the disorder between the layers
precluded the interpretation of the electron density of the intercalating
units (Figure S6). Nevertheless, the clear
increase in the interlayer distance to 15.7 Å (N–N distance
between pyridyl nitrogens coordinated to paddlewheel clusters) corroborated
the incorporation of longer pillars, consistent with the length of
the molecular motor 1 (N–N distance in DFT-optimized
structure B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) 15.4 Å).[75] In addition, the expansion of the elementary unit cell in the [001]
direction was confirmed by the changes observed in positions of the
peaks in the PXRD diffractograms. In comparison to the PXRD of the
parent MOF, significant shifts to a smaller diffraction angle were
observed for the peaks ascribed to reflections from planes perpendicular
and oblique to the [001] direction, while peaks corresponding to reflections
from planes parallel to the [001] direction remained unchanged (Figures d and S8). Furthermore, Pawley refinement showed good
agreement between the dimensions of the targeted motorized PdTCPP MOF unit cell and the experimental PXRD pattern (Figures S8 and S9, Table S2). Finally,
elemental analysis was consistent with the anticipated elemental composition
of the parent MOF (see SI, section 2).
Figure 2
(a) Synthesis
of the motorized pillared-paddlewheel MOF via SALE
from parent MOF bearing DPG pillars by exchange with
molecular motor 1. (b) Optical micrograph of the parent PdTCPP DPG-based MOF (top) and motorized PdTCPP 1-based MOF (bottom) crystals obtained via linker exchange (SALE)
(scale bar 100 μm). (c) Raman spectra of the parent pillared-paddlewheel
MOF (black spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW), bispyridyl molecular motor
(blue spectrum, 785 nm, 50 mW), and motorized pillared-paddlewheel
MOF (red spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW). (d) Comparison of the experimental
PXRD patterns of parent MOF (black, bottom pattern) and motorized
MOF (red, top pattern). Miller indices of planes corresponding to
the peaks are given in brackets. Vertical dashed lines indicate peaks
in the PXRD pattern of motorized MOF, corresponding to (hkl) (where l ≠ 0) planes.
(a) Synthesis
of the motorized pillared-paddlewheel MOF via SALE
from parent MOF bearing DPG pillars by exchange with
molecular motor 1. (b) Optical micrograph of the parent PdTCPPDPG-based MOF (top) and motorized PdTCPP 1-based MOF (bottom) crystals obtained via linker exchange (SALE)
(scale bar 100 μm). (c) Raman spectra of the parent pillared-paddlewheel
MOF (black spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW), bispyridyl molecular motor
(blue spectrum, 785 nm, 50 mW), and motorized pillared-paddlewheel
MOF (red spectrum, 1064 nm, 250 mW). (d) Comparison of the experimental
PXRD patterns of parent MOF (black, bottom pattern) and motorized
MOF (red, top pattern). Miller indices of planes corresponding to
the peaks are given in brackets. Vertical dashed lines indicate peaks
in the PXRD pattern of motorized MOF, corresponding to (hkl) (where l ≠ 0) planes.
Energy Transfer, Photochemical, and Thermal Isomerization in
Solution
Intermolecular energy transfer between the porphyrin
(PdTCPP) and molecular motor 1 in solution
was characterized by emission spectroscopy (Figure b). Deoxygenated solutions of PdTCPP excited at 530 nm show weak fluorescence at 610 nm and a strong
emission band characteristic of phosphorescence at 700 nm (Figure b, black line) with
a lifetime of ca. 221 μs (Figures S14–16, Table S3).[84] For mixtures of PdTCPP and molecular motor 1 the intensity of the phosphorescence was substantially reduced with
a decrease in phosphorescence lifetime to ca. 15 μs (1:1
ratio of PdTCPP:1) and ca. 5 μs (1:5
ratio of PdTCPP:1, Figures S14–16, Table S3), in line
with energy transfer between triplet states of the porphyrin and motor 1 (Figure b, red line). Stern–Volmer plots (emission intensity and lifetime, Figures S14 and S16, respectively) with concentrations
of 1 between 0.0 and 223.0 μM were linear, confirming
dynamic quenching of the phosphorescence of PdTCPP, thus
excluding formation of aggregates in the concentration range studied.
Linear fitting of the data gave an intermolecular quenching rate constant kq = 9.0 ± 0.3 × 108 M–1 s–1 approaching the Smoluchowski
limit of the diffusion-limited rate constant in DMF (7.6 × 109 M–1 s–1 at 20 °C),[85] suggesting that the energy transfer between PdTCPP and 1 is likely under diffusion control
(Figures S14 and S16).[86]
Figure 3
(a) Triplet–triplet sensitization of the light-driven rotary
motion of molecular motor 1 by intermolecular energy
transfer from PdTCPP. (b) Emission spectra (λexc = 530 nm) of PdTCPP (black spectrum, 44.6
μM, DMF) and a mixture of PdTCPP and molecular
motor 1 (red spectrum, 1:5 molar ratio of PdTCPP:1). Emission maxima of fluorescence (610 nm) and phosphorescence
(700 nm) are indicated with arrows. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra
(−20 °C, 6.1 μM, DMF) of 1 (blue solid
line) irradiated at 395 nm to the photostationary state (blue dashed
line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 (1:1 molar
ratio, black solid line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 irradiated at 530 nm to the photostationary state (red solid
line), and photostationary state mixture after thermal helix inversion
(red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in absorbance followed at 450 nm
upon multiple irradiation and heating cycles. (d) Changes in the Raman
spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW) of a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 in DMF (black solid line), after irradiation at 530 nm at
−20 °C to a photostationary state (red solid line), and
after thermal helix inversion (red dashed line). Arrows indicate bands
characteristic of the metastable isomer.
(a) Triplet–triplet sensitization of the light-driven rotary
motion of molecular motor 1 by intermolecular energy
transfer from PdTCPP. (b) Emission spectra (λexc = 530 nm) of PdTCPP (black spectrum, 44.6
μM, DMF) and a mixture of PdTCPP and molecular
motor 1 (red spectrum, 1:5 molar ratio of PdTCPP:1). Emission maxima of fluorescence (610 nm) and phosphorescence
(700 nm) are indicated with arrows. (c) UV–vis absorption spectra
(−20 °C, 6.1 μM, DMF) of 1 (blue solid
line) irradiated at 395 nm to the photostationary state (blue dashed
line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 (1:1 molar
ratio, black solid line), a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 irradiated at 530 nm to the photostationary state (red solid
line), and photostationary state mixture after thermal helix inversion
(red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in absorbance followed at 450 nm
upon multiple irradiation and heating cycles. (d) Changes in the Raman
spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW) of a mixture of PdTCPP and 1 in DMF (black solid line), after irradiation at 530 nm at
−20 °C to a photostationary state (red solid line), and
after thermal helix inversion (red dashed line). Arrows indicate bands
characteristic of the metastable isomer.Intermolecular sensitization of the rotary motion of motor 1 in solution was studied with UV–vis absorption, 1H NMR, and Raman spectroscopies (Figures c, 3d, and S4). In the UV–vis absorption spectra
the region characteristic of the main absorption band of the molecular
motor 1 (maximum ≈ 400 nm, Figure c, blue solid line) is dominated by the strong
Soret band of PdTCPP (Figure c, black solid line). Nevertheless, irradiation
of the argon-purged solution of 1 and PdTCPP (1:1 ratio of 1:PdTCPP) at 530 nm (Q-band
of the porphyrin) led to a bathochromic shift of the absorption in
the region of the Soret band (Figure c, red solid line), consistent with formation of the
metastable isomer of the molecular motor (Figure c, blue dashed lines). Subsequent warming
of the sample led to the recovery of the original spectrum, consistent
with the recovery of the stable isomer by thermal helix inversion
(Figure b, red dashed
line). An isosbestic point was maintained at 323 nm throughout both
photochemical and thermal processes, as expected for unimolecular
reactions (Figure S12). Furthermore, the
irradiation/thermal isomerization cycles could be performed for at
least five consecutive cycles without noticeable fatigue or degradation
(Figure c, inset).
The rate of the thermal helix inversion of bispyridyl motor 1 in the presence of PdTCPP in DMF was determined
by following the exponential decrease of the absorbance at 440
nm over a range of temperatures (6–14 °C, Figure S13). Eyring plot analysis showed that
the Gibbs free energy of activation of the thermal helix inversion
of the metastable isomer of 1 in this mixture (Δ‡G(20 °C) = 88.0 ± 0.4 kJ
mol–1, t1/2 = 9.1 min, Figure S13) is essentially the same as the previously
determined value in DMF[75] (Δ‡G(20 °C) = 87.7 ± 0.6 kJ
mol–1, t1/2 = 8.0 min),
thereby demonstrating that bispyridyl motor 1 can operate
similarly via direct excitation and triplet sensitization. In the
Raman spectra of the equimolar mixture of PdTCPP and 1 in DMF, bands characteristic of PdTCPP partially
overlap and obscure bands characteristic of 1 (Figure d, black spectrum).
Nonetheless, the features consistent with sequential photochemical
and thermal isomerization of 1 could be readily observed
with Raman spectroscopy. Irradiation of this mixture at 530 nm at
low temperature (−20 °C, sufficient to prevent thermal
helix inversion over the time scale of the experiment) led to a decrease
in the Raman scattering at 1580 cm–1 with a concomitant
increase at 1550 cm–1. Warming to room temperature
led to gradual recovery of the initial spectrum (Figure d). The intermolecular energy
transfer-induced photoisomerization of motor 1 was monitored
with low-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy (Figure S4). After irradiation of an equimolar mixture of 1 and PdTCPP at 530 nm and −30 °C,
a new set of upfield-shifted 1H NMR resonances was observed
in the aliphatic part of the spectrum, characteristic of the metastable
isomer. Warming the sample resulted in full recovery of the original
spectrum and hence of the stable isomer. The photostationary state
ratio of metastable and stable isomers of 1, established
upon irradiation at 530 nm, was approximately 1:1 (Figure S4), consistent with changes observed by Raman spectroscopy
(Figure d), which
showed a ∼50% decrease in the intensity of the bands characteristic
of the stable isomer (1580 cm–1).
Energy Transfer,
Photochemical, and Thermal Isomerization in
the Solid State
Since pillared Zn paddlewheel MOFs are known
to lose crystallinity or undergo structural collapse upon solvent
removal, all of the experiments involving PdTCPP MOFs
were conducted in solvent (DMF)-saturated conditions.[79] The extent of the energy transfer between 1 and PdTCPP linkers in motorized MOF was determined
with steady-state and time-resolved emission spectroscopy.Upon
excitation at 530 nm the parent PdTCPP MOF showed a similar
emission spectrum to that of PdTCPP in DMF with a small
hypsochromic shift of both fluorescence and phosphorescence (Figure a). Conversely, in
the emission spectrum of the motorized PdTCPP MOF a strong
decrease in the phosphorescence intensity was observed, consistent
with the energy transfer between the linkers (Figure a). Furthermore, a significant drop in the
porphyrin phosphorescence lifetime was observed from ca. 100 μs
for the parent MOF to ca. 10 μs for the motorized MOF (Figures S17 and S18). The difference between
the phosphorescence lifetimes of PdTCPP in solution and
in the parent MOF originates from the effect of excessive scattering
from the latter; nevertheless, the large decrease in emission lifetime
between parent and motorized MOF clearly indicates energy transfer
between 1 and PdTCPP linkers in MOF.
Figure 4
(a) Comparison
of the emission spectra (λexc =
530 nm) of DMF suspensions of parent PdTCPP MOF (black
line) and motorized PdTCPP MOF (red line). (b) Changes
in the Raman spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW, 40 s integration time) of
the motorized PdTCPP MOF sample (black solid line) upon
irradiation at 530 nm (red solid line) and subsequent thermal isomerization
(red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in the area around 1550 cm–1 followed upon multiple photochemical/thermal isomerization
cycles. Label of ordinate, “Area”, refers to the integrated
area between 1530 and 1551 cm–1.
(a) Comparison
of the emission spectra (λexc =
530 nm) of DMF suspensions of parent PdTCPP MOF (black
line) and motorized PdTCPP MOF (red line). (b) Changes
in the Raman spectrum (1064 nm, 250 mW, 40 s integration time) of
the motorized PdTCPP MOF sample (black solid line) upon
irradiation at 530 nm (red solid line) and subsequent thermal isomerization
(red dashed line). (Inset) Changes in the area around 1550 cm–1 followed upon multiple photochemical/thermal isomerization
cycles. Label of ordinate, “Area”, refers to the integrated
area between 1530 and 1551 cm–1.The rotary motion of motor 1 inserted in the
MOF scaffold
was followed with NIR–Raman spectroscopy (see SI section 12 for other spectra). Previously, we demonstrated
that this technique is particularly convenient to study the photochemical
and thermal isomerization of rotary molecular motors in condensed
phase as it allows for unambiguous correlation of spectral data with
the structural changes that these molecules exhibit in response to
light and heat stimuli.[75] Upon exposure
of the polycrystalline motorized PdTCPP MOF sample to
green light (530 nm) a gradual decrease in the Raman intensity at
1580 cm–1 with concomitant increase in scattering
intensity at 1550 cm–1 was observed (Figure b). Similar spectral features
were detected upon photochemical isomerization of molecular motor 1 in solution and therefore could be ascribed to the same
photochemical process. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy showed that
for thin samples the photostationary state of 1 reached
via triplet sensitization in motorized PdTCPP MOF was
similar to that in solution (Figure S22). Taking into consideration the molar absorptivity of PdTCPP at
532 nm and the concentration of molecular motor 1 in
the crystal of the motorized MOF, the penetration depth for the excitation
light in these crystals is likely no more than a few micrometers,
and therefore, we envision the future application of these materials
to be based on the surface-mounted MOFs (SURMOFs) or single-crystal
devices.[87] When the irradiation was discontinued,
the initial Raman spectrum was recovered gradually, indicating thermal
relaxation of the metastable to stable isomer. The barrier of the
thermal relaxation at room temperature was determined by monitoring
the changes in the bands area characteristic of the metastable isomer
(Figures S23–25 and Table S3). The Gibbs free energy of activation
for this process (Δ‡G(20
°C)) was 88.7 ± 0.8 kJ mol–1 (t1/2 ≈ 13 min) and corresponded well to
the barrier determined in DMF solution (88.0 ± 0.4 kJ mol–1, t1/2 ≈ 9 min).
The good agreement between the barriers in solution and the solid
material shows that molecular motor 1 can perform its
large amplitude rotary motion uncompromised while incorporated in PdTCPP MOF. Furthermore, irradiation/thermal relaxation steps
could be repeated over five cycles (Figure b, inset) without any noticeable sign of
fatigue or photodegradation, indicating high stability of the framework.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we established that the photoisomerization
of the
molecular motor pillars in a porphyrinZn paddlewheel MOF can be driven
with visible light by triplet sensitization. The desired motorized
MOF was constructed by postsynthetic linker exchange (SALE) from the
newly developed parent PdTCPP MOF bearing DPG pillars. Exchange of these pillars with the longer bispyridyl motor 1 resulted in the expected expansion of the elementary cell
in the c direction as shown by the SC X-ray and PXRD
data. Due to the spatial coarrangement of the chromophores in the
motorized MOF, the energy transfer between photosensitizer (2D layers)
and molecular motor (pillars) was found to be efficient, and the photochemical
isomerization of the molecular motor could be achieved with green
530 nm light. Additionally, it was shown that the rate of the thermal
helix inversion step of the molecular motors incorporated in the material
scaffold is essentially the same as that observed in solution, owing
to the large free volume present in the framework. The demonstration
of visible-light-driven rotary motion of a molecular motor in a metal–organic
framework opens many perspectives for future applications, such as
membranes and pumps able to accelerate flow of gases or in combination
with catalytic function and miniaturized chemical reactors able to
accelerate inflow of reactants and outflow of products, powered by
noninvasive visible light.[88] Furthermore,
we envision that this strategy may be used to expand the scope of
photosensitizers and molecular motors to achieve an even further shift
of the excitation wavelength toward red light.
Authors: Kelong Zhu; Christopher A O'Keefe; V Nicholas Vukotic; Robert W Schurko; Stephen J Loeb Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Cortnie S Vogelsberg; Fernando J Uribe-Romo; Andrew S Lipton; Song Yang; K N Houk; Stuart Brown; Miguel A Garcia-Garibay Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Derek E Williams; Joseph A Rietman; Josef M Maier; Rui Tan; Andrew B Greytak; Mark D Smith; Jeanette A Krause; Natalia B Shustova Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jiří Kaleta; Jiawen Chen; Guillaume Bastien; Martin Dračínský; Milan Mašát; Charles T Rogers; Ben L Feringa; Josef Michl Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Arjen Cnossen; Lili Hou; Michael M Pollard; Philana V Wesenhagen; Wesley R Browne; Ben L Feringa Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: J Perego; Charl X Bezuidenhout; I Villa; F Cova; R Crapanzano; I Frank; F Pagano; N Kratochwill; E Auffray; S Bracco; A Vedda; C Dujardin; P E Sozzani; F Meinardi; A Comotti; A Monguzzi Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Cosima Stähler; Lars Grunenberg; Maxwell W Terban; Wesley R Browne; Daniel Doellerer; Michael Kathan; Martin Etter; Bettina V Lotsch; Ben L Feringa; Simon Krause Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2022-06-02 Impact factor: 9.969
Authors: Gregory B Boursalian; Eise R Nijboer; Ruth Dorel; Lukas Pfeifer; Omer Markovitch; Alex Blokhuis; Ben L Feringa Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jian-Xin Wang; Jun Yin; Osama Shekhah; Osman M Bakr; Mohamed Eddaoudi; Omar F Mohammed Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: L Pfeifer; S Crespi; P van der Meulen; J Kemmink; R M Scheek; M F Hilbers; W J Buma; B L Feringa Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-04-19 Impact factor: 17.694