Carin Aime Rinne1, Dorothea C Dagassan-Berndt2, Thomas Connert1, Magdalena Müller-Gerbl3, Roland Weiger1, Clemens Walter1. 1. Department of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Centre for Dental Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 2. Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology and Oral Medicine University Center of Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Anatomy, Basel University, Basel, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of scanning parameter in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images on accuracy and confidence with measurements of furcation involvement (FI) in maxillary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six half cadaver heads with present maxillary molars (n = 10) were available. CBCT scans with the fixed-parameter field of view (4 × 4 cm, 12 × 17 cm) amperage and voltage (4 mA, 90 kV) and with varying scan modes (SM), that is images/scan (IS), voxel sizes (VZ) and rotation (R), were performed using one CBCT apparatus. The images were analysed by two calibrated investigators. Horizontal FI's were measured in mm or a "through and through" destruction (FI degree III) was recorded. Each rater scored the FI measurements performed in each scan as "confident" or as "not confident". Data were statistically analysed using chi-square tests. RESULTS: The agreement between CBCT FI measurements and intra-surgical FI measurements varied according to SM (SM HiSp 180°, 0.08: kappa 0.538, CI; 95%: 0.362-0.714; SM Std. 360°, 0.25: kappa 0.698, CI; 95%: 0.534-0.861). The number of measurements scored as "confident" varied according to SM (SM Std. 360°, 0.08:52 out of 60 measurements; SM Std. 360°, 0.25:16 out of 60 measurements; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SM of CBCT significantly affect the confidence with FI measurements in maxillary molars.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of scanning parameter in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images on accuracy and confidence with measurements of furcation involvement (FI) in maxillary molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Six half cadaver heads with present maxillary molars (n = 10) were available. CBCT scans with the fixed-parameter field of view (4 × 4 cm, 12 × 17 cm) amperage and voltage (4 mA, 90 kV) and with varying scan modes (SM), that is images/scan (IS), voxel sizes (VZ) and rotation (R), were performed using one CBCT apparatus. The images were analysed by two calibrated investigators. Horizontal FI's were measured in mm or a "through and through" destruction (FI degree III) was recorded. Each rater scored the FI measurements performed in each scan as "confident" or as "not confident". Data were statistically analysed using chi-square tests. RESULTS: The agreement between CBCT FI measurements and intra-surgical FI measurements varied according to SM (SM HiSp 180°, 0.08: kappa 0.538, CI; 95%: 0.362-0.714; SM Std. 360°, 0.25: kappa 0.698, CI; 95%: 0.534-0.861). The number of measurements scored as "confident" varied according to SM (SM Std. 360°, 0.08:52 out of 60 measurements; SM Std. 360°, 0.25:16 out of 60 measurements; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: SM of CBCT significantly affect the confidence with FI measurements in maxillary molars.
Authors: Maurice Ruetters; Holger Gehrig; Ti-Sun Kim; Valentin Bartha; Thomas Bruckner; Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Anna Felten; Christopher Lux; Sinan Sen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-04-26 Impact factor: 4.996