Literature DB >> 32324157

Faecal haemoglobin distributions by sex, age, deprivation and geographical region: consequences for colorectal cancer screening strategies.

Gavin R C Clark1,2, Judith A Strachan3, Alisson McPherson4, Jayne Digby2, Craig Mowat5, Robert J C Steele2, Callum G Fraser2.   

Abstract

Objectives Faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) are becoming widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and assessment of symptomatic patients. Faecal haemoglobin concentration (f-Hb) thresholds are used to guide subsequent investigation. We established the distributions of f-Hb in a large screening population by sex, age, deprivation and geography. Methods Single estimates of f-Hb were documented for all individuals participating in the first 18 months of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP). The distributions of f-Hb were generated for all participants, all men and women, and men and women by age quintile and deprivation quintile. Distributions were also generated by geographical region for all participants, men and women, and by deprivation. Comparisons of f-Hb distributions with those found in a pilot evaluation of FIT and three other countries were performed. Results f-Hb was documented for 887,248 screening participants, 422,385 men and 464,863 women. f-Hb varied by sex, age, deprivation quintile and geographical region. The f-Hb distributions by sex and age differed between the SBoSP and the pilot evaluation and the three other countries. Conclusions f-Hb is higher in men than in women and increases with age and deprivation in both sexes. f-Hb also varies by geographical region, independently of deprivation, and by country. The f-Hb distribution estimated by pilot evaluation may not represent the population distribution. Decision limits have advantages over reference intervals. Use of partitioned f-Hb thresholds for further investigation, based on the data generated, has advantages and disadvantages, as do risk scores based on a spectrum of influencing variables.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colorectal cancer screening; decision limits; faecal haemoglobin; faecal immunochemical test; reference values

Year:  2020        PMID: 32324157     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  6 in total

1.  Factors associated with positive predictive value of preliminary screening in a two-step screening strategy for colorectal neoplasms in China.

Authors:  Ji-Bin Li; Zhi-Yu Qiu; Yu-Xiang Deng; Yin Li; Zhuo-Chen Lin; Yan-Ping Wu; Fan Weng; Huan Tian; Qing-Jian Ou; Cheng-Hua Gong; Zhi-Zhong Pan; De-Sen Wan; Jian-Hong Peng; Yu-Jing Fang
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2022-01-08

Review 2.  Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Shailavi Jain; Jetrina Maque; Artin Galoosian; Antonia Osuna-Garcia; Folasade P May
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  Faecal haemoglobin concentrations in women and men diagnosed with colorectal cancer in a national screening programme.

Authors:  Gavin Rc Clark; Jayne Digby; Callum G Fraser; Judith A Strachan; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Comparison with first round findings of faecal haemoglobin concentrations and clinical outcomes in the second round of a biennial faecal immunochemical test based colorectal cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Gavin Rc Clark; Callum G Fraser; Judith A Strachan; Robert Jc Steele
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.687

5.  Alternative diagnoses and demographics associated with a raised quantitative faecal immunochemical test in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  Mark S Johnstone; Gillian Miller; Grace Pang; Paul Burton; Georgios Kourounis; Jack Winter; Emilia Crighton; David Mansouri; Paul Witherspoon; Karen Smith; Stephen T McSorley
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.587

6.  Optimal diagnostic accuracy of quantitative faecal immunochemical test positivity thresholds for colorectal cancer detection in primary health care: A community-based cohort study.

Authors:  Noel Pin-Vieito; Laura García Nimo; Luis Bujanda; Begona Román Alonso; María Ángeles Gutierrez-Stampa; Vanessa Aguilar-Gama; Isabel Portillo; Joaquín Cubiella
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.