| Literature DB >> 32323502 |
Ying Wei1, Lili Peng1, Yan Li1, Zhen Long Zhao1, Ming An Yu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT).Entities:
Keywords: Intact parathyroid hormone; Microwave ablation; Primary hyperparathyroidism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32323502 PMCID: PMC7183824 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Images show percutaneous MWA of PHPT nodule.
A. There was radioactive concentration in PHPT nodule (arrows) on MIBI. B. Isoechoic PHPT nodule with sharp boundary (arrows) behind superior left lobe of thyroid and on right side of carotid artery (thick arrow) on US. C. Uniform hyperenhancement of PHPT nodule (arrows) beside carotid artery (thick arrow) in arterial phase on CEUS. D. Injection of hydrodissection (blue arrow) around PHPT nodule (arrows) before MWA. E. MWA procedure of PHPT nodule: hyperechoic area emerging inside nodule (short arrows)-which surrounded by hydrodissection (blue arrow), around antenna (long arrow). F. After MWA, nonenhancement area covered PHPT nodule (arrows), peripheral hydrodissection (blue arrow) beside carotid artery (thick arrow) on CEUS. CEUS = contrast-enhanced US, MIBI = 99mTc-sestamibi, MWA = microwave ablation, PHPT = primary hyperparathyroidism, US = ultrasound
Baseline Clinical Characteristic of Patients with PHPT (n = 67)
| Characteristic | Data |
|---|---|
| Sex | |
| Male | 22 |
| Female | 45 |
| Mean age (years) | 56.0 ± 16.3 |
| < 50 | 22 |
| > 50 | 45 |
| Clinical and laboratory data | |
| Symptomatic | 32 |
| Nephrolithiasis | 14 |
| Ostealgia | 11 |
| Fatigue | 8 |
| Pruritus | 1 |
| Asymptomatic | 35 |
| 25-hydroxyvitamin D (nmol/L) | 28.7 (7.0–102.1) |
| Frankly deficiency | 23 |
| Insufficiency | 40 |
| Normal | 4 |
| Normocalcemic PHPT | 24 (2.51 ± 0.16) |
| Hypercalcemic | 43 (2.88 ± 0.21 ) |
| Creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 91.8 (22.0–131.4) |
| Urinary calcium (mmol/24 h) | 6.9 ± 3.1 |
| Nodules | 72 |
| Normal location | 71 |
| Superior left | 12 |
| Inferior left | 29 |
| Superior right | 11 |
| Inferior right | 19 |
| Ectopic location | 1 |
| Within thyroid | 1 |
| Volume (mL) | 0.6 (0.03–37.4) |
| Enhancement pattern on CEUS | |
| Uniform hyperenhancement | 59 |
| Nonuniform hyperenhancement | 8 |
CEUS = contrast-enhanced ultrasound, PHPT = primary hyperparathyroidism
Fig. 2Images show additional ablation of residual PHPT lesion.
A. There was radioactive concentration in PHPT nodule (arrow). B. Before MWA, inhomogeneous isoechoic PHPT nodule on US (arrows). C. There was nonuniform hyperenhancement PHPT nodule (arrows) on CEUS. D. After MWA, nonenhancement area (arrows) covered PHPT nodule on CEUS. E. Three months after MWA, there was radioactive concentration in PHPT nodule (arrow). F. Hypoechoic PHPT nodule with abundant blood flow signals (arrows) around ablation zone was shown on US. G. There was active area-hyperenhancement (arrows) around ablation zone on CEUS. H. After additional ablation, non-enhancement (arrows) was shown on CEUS.
Rates of Achieving Normal Level or for Serum iPTH, Calcium and Phosphorus after MWA
| Follow-Up Time | iPTH (pg/mL) | Calcium (mmol/L) | Phosphorus (mmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rate (Normal Number/Total Number) | Rate (Normal Number/Total Number) | Rate (Normal Number/Total Number) | |
| Post-MWA (2 H) | 64.2 (43/67) | 71.6 (48/67) | 67.2 (45/67) |
| Post-MWA (1 D) | 74.6 (47/63) | 84.1 (53/63) | 79.4 (50/63) |
| Post-MWA (7 D) | 77.5 (31/40) | 90.0 (36/40) | 85.0 (34/40) |
| Post-MWA (1 M) | 84.9 (45/53) | 92.5 (49/53) | 90.6 (48/53) |
| Post-MWA (3 M) | 86.7 (39/45) | 91.1 (41/45) | 93.3 (42/45) |
| Post-MWA (6 M) | 89.4 (42/47) | 93.6 (44/47) | 95.7 (45/47) |
| Post-MWA (12 M) | 89.5 (34/38) | 92.1 (35/38) | 94.7 (36/38) |
| Post-MWA (18 M) | 89.3 (25/28) | 92.9 (26/28) | 96.4 (26/28) |
| Post-MWA (24 M) | 86.4 (19/22) | 90.9 (20/22) | 95.5 (21/22) |
There are 42, 34, and 28 patients who received MWA more than 12 M, 18 M, and 24 M, respectively. D = day, H = hour, iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone, M = month, MWA = microwave ablation
Changes of Serum iPTH, Calcium, Phosphorus, ALP and Volume of Nodule before MWA and at Each Follow-Up
| Follow-Up Time (Number) | iPTH (pg/mL) | Calcium (mmol/L) | Phosphorus (mmol/L) | ALP (U/L) | Volume (cm3) | VRR (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before MWA (n = 67) | 157.3 (66.1–1577.2) | 2.75 ± 0.26 | 0.86 ± 0.20 | 79 (45–1426) | 0.56 (0.03–37.41) | - |
| 2 H post-MWA (n = 63) | 20.1 (1.7–348.8)* | 2.63 ± 0.26* | 0.85 ± 0.20 | 88 (41–1475) | - | - |
| 1 D post-MWA (n = 63) | 17.1 (1.7–188.2)* | 2.39 ± 0.21*† | 0.99 ± 0.22*† | 75 (40–1360) | - | - |
| 7 D post-MWA (n = 40) | 50.5 (9.4–355.9)*†‡ | 2.34 ± 0.26*† | 1.03 ± 0.24*† | 113 (55–1246) | - | - |
| 1 M post-MWA (n = 53) | 61.4 (20.6–498.0)*†‡ | 2.35 ± 0.17*† | 1.12 ± 0.18*† | 87 (46–296) | 0.51 (0.03–4.84)* | 34.8 (-130.51–84.98) |
| 3 M post-MWA (n = 45) | 56.6 (16.1–4166.5)*†‡ | 2.39 ± 0.13*† | 1.05 ± 0.18*† | 60 (36–83) | 0.19 (0.02–3.48)* | 35.0 (-104.38–81.83) |
| 6 M post-MWA (n = 47) | 39.2 (15.1–85.6)*†‡ | 2.34 ± 0.15*† | 1.12 ± 0.22*† | 54 (37–69)*†‡ | 0.11 (0–2.10)* | 79.4 (75.07–100) |
| 12 M post-MWA (n = 38) | 47.0 (27.7–117.4)*†‡ | 2.36 ± 0.13*† | 1.10 ± 0.18*†‡ | 54 (27–104)*†‡ | 0 (0–1.76)* | 96.4 (79.10–100) |
| 18 M post-MWA (n = 28) | 36 (22.8–96.7)*†‡ | 2.42 ± 0.09*† | 1.13 ± 0.15*†‡ | 51 (27–109)*†‡ | 0 (0–1.62)* | 100 (79.8–100) |
| 24 M post-MWA (n = 22) | 45.1 (22.8–120.4)*†‡ | 2.38 ± 0.17*† | 1.14 ± 0.27*†‡ | 46 (28–94)*†‡ | 0 (0–0.44)* | 100 (80.7–100) |
Serum calcium and phosphorus were presented as mean ± standard deviation; iPTH and ALP values were medians and interquartile ranges. Normal range: iPTH, 12–88 pg/mL; calcium, 2.00–2.75 mmol/L; phosphorus, 0.81–1.78 mmol/L; ALP, 40–150 IU/L. There are 42, 34, and 28 patients who received MWA more than 12 M, 18 M, and 24 M. *p < 0.01 (compared with values before MWA), †p < 0.05 (compared with values 2 H after MWA), ‡p < 0.05 (compared with values 1 D after MWA). ALP = alkaline phosphatase, VRR = volume reduction rate
Fig. 3Multiple comparisons among serum iPTH, calcium, phosphorus and ALP before and after ablation.
ALP = alkaline phosphatase, D = day, H = hour, iPTH = intact parathyroid hormone, M = month, MWA = microwave ablation
Complications and Side Effects of MWA in PHPT Patients
| Complication or Side Effect | Number (%) | Time of Detection (Days) | Time to Recovery (Days) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Major | |||
| Hoarseness | 4 (6.0) | 1–3 | 30–90 |
| Minor | |||
| Cough | 2 (3.0) | 1 | 1–3 |
| Side effect | |||
| Pain | 11 (16.4) | 1 | 1–3 |
| Numbness | 12 (17.9) | 1–3 | 1–30 |
| Hypoparathyroidism | 16 (25.4) | 1–7 | 3–14 |
| Hypocalcaemia | 2 (3.0) | 1–3 | 3–30 |