Manjiao Ma1, Bo Zhu2, Jing Zhao3, Hongyi Li4, Lian Zhou5, Mu Wang5, Xiuhua Zhang1, Yuguang Huang1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China. zhubo@pumch.cn. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China. 4. Department of Anesthesiology, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. 5. Department of Stomatology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is rare to see pediatric patients with previous perioperative anaphylaxis receiving future anesthesia, but it is critical to understand how to choose assessments, interpret the results, and develop a future anesthetic plan. RECENT FINDINGS: Analysis of the results revealed that patients, at any age, regardless of sex and nationality, and the number of surgeries, have the risk of perioperative anaphylaxis while the risk of allergy increases as patients present multiple surgical events or have a previous history of atopy. 94.7% of pediatric patients with allergy testing after perioperative anaphylaxis tolerated subsequent general anesthesia without complications. Specific IgE tests, basophil activation tests, and skin tests are not available and suitable for all culprits. The early skin test could be considered a supplement for later testing. Drug challenge test is the golden standard but can only be used as the last resort. If general anesthesia is inevitable, avoidance of the culprit and use of alternative agents can help the patients prevent another potential recurrence. Full use of inhalation anesthesia without unnecessary neuromuscular blockade agents and avoidance of latex is recommended when the surgery is urgent or skin tests for children cannot be performed in time. This review summarizes characteristics of perioperative pediatric anaphylaxis, main tests for various drugs, and their sensitivities and specificities as well as recommendations as to how to implement safe anesthesia in the future.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is rare to see pediatric patients with previous perioperative anaphylaxis receiving future anesthesia, but it is critical to understand how to choose assessments, interpret the results, and develop a future anesthetic plan. RECENT FINDINGS: Analysis of the results revealed that patients, at any age, regardless of sex and nationality, and the number of surgeries, have the risk of perioperative anaphylaxis while the risk of allergy increases as patients present multiple surgical events or have a previous history of atopy. 94.7% of pediatric patients with allergy testing after perioperative anaphylaxis tolerated subsequent general anesthesia without complications. Specific IgE tests, basophil activation tests, and skin tests are not available and suitable for all culprits. The early skin test could be considered a supplement for later testing. Drug challenge test is the golden standard but can only be used as the last resort. If general anesthesia is inevitable, avoidance of the culprit and use of alternative agents can help the patients prevent another potential recurrence. Full use of inhalation anesthesia without unnecessary neuromuscular blockade agents and avoidance of latex is recommended when the surgery is urgent or skin tests for children cannot be performed in time. This review summarizes characteristics of perioperative pediatric anaphylaxis, main tests for various drugs, and their sensitivities and specificities as well as recommendations as to how to implement safe anesthesia in the future.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anaphylaxis; Anesthesia; Neuromuscular block agents; Pediatric patients; Skin test
Authors: E Florvaag; S G O Johansson; H Oman; L Venemalm; F Degerbeck; T Dybendal; M Lundberg Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Brianne Bordes; David Martin; Brian Schloss; Allan Beebe; Walter Samora; Jan Klamar; David Stukus; Joseph D Tobias Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016 Jul-Aug
Authors: Paul Michel Mertes; Gerald W Volcheck; Lene H Garvey; Tonomori Takazawa; Peter R Platt; Anne B Guttormsen; Charles Tacquard Journal: Presse Med Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 1.228