Correction to: Advanced imaging in adult diffusely infiltrating low-grade gliomas.

The original article [1] contains errors in Table 1 in rows ktrans and Ve; the correct version of Table 1 can be viewed in this Correction article.

Correction to: Insights Imaging

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0793-8

The original article "Advanced imaging in adult diffusely infiltrating low-grade gliomas" contains errors in Table 1 in rows ktrans and Ve; the correct version of Table 1 can be viewed in this Correction article.

Table 1

Radiomic data for differential diagnosis of low-grade vs high-grade gliomas

Parameters	Low-grade glioma	High-grade glioma	Cut of valueRef (Range)Ref
rCBVmax	Low	High	1.76 [10, 19] (0.94–3.34) [9–11, 19–21]
rCBVMD	Low	High	1.44 [22] (1.08–1.81) [22]
nADCmin	High	Low	1.07 × 10−3 mm2/s [24] (0.31–1.31) [23–28]
Cho/Cr ratio	Low	High	1.56 [19] (1.3–2.04) [29–31]
MKMD	Low	High	0.17 [28] (0.11–0.28) [28]
FATC	Low	High	0.3 [25] (0.14–0.63) [25]
MDmin	High	Low	0.98 mm2/s [25] (0.76–0.91) [25]
ktrans	Low	High	1.18 [22] (0.91–1.45) [22]
Ve	Low	High	1.43 [22] (1.06–1.80) [22]
ITTS grade	1.2	2.6	NA [9]
APT signal (%)	Low	High	2.23% [15] (1.53%–3.70%) [15]

rCBV maximum relative cerebral blood volume, rCBV standardized mean difference of rCBVmax,nADC Normalized minimum apparent diffusion coefficient, Cho/Cr Choline/Creatine, MK mean difference in mean kurtosis, FA Odds ratio of fractional anisotropy in the tumor core, MD Minimum mean diffusivity, k standardized mean difference of volume transfer coefficient, V standardized mean difference of volume fraction of extravascular extracellular space, ITTS Intratumoral susceptibility score, APT Percent amide proton transfer signal