| Literature DB >> 32322735 |
Omid Aminian1, Zeinab Moinfar2, Sahar Eftekhari1, André Esser3, Thomas Schettgen3, Michael Felten3, Andrea Kaifie3, Thomas Kraus3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) continues over the world through seafood consumption and indoor exposure to building materials containing PCB. This study aimed to assess the relationship between plasma level of PCB congeners and lipid profile and Body Mass Index (BMI) as well.Entities:
Keywords: Biological sciences; Body mass index; Endocrinology; HDL; Health sciences; LDL; Polychlorinated biphenyls; Public health; Serum lipid; Triglyceride
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322735 PMCID: PMC7160561 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03775
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Demographic characteristics and metabolic values of the study population (N = 181).
| Characteristic | Grouping | Number (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 142 (78.5) |
| Female | 39 (21.5) | |
| Fat rich diet | High | 78 (43.1) |
| Low | 103 (56.9) | |
| Sea food diet | High | 63 (34.8) |
| Low | 118 (65.2) | |
| Working Type | Sedentary | 70 (38.7) |
| Active | 111 (61.3) | |
| Variable | Mean | Standard Deviation |
| Age | 37.27 | 10.03 |
| Triglycerides | 152.02 | 94.45 |
| LDL Cholesterol | 108.50 | 29.33 |
| HDL Cholesterol (Male) | 45.15 | 8.58 |
| HDL Cholesterol (Female) | 54.91 | 11.57 |
| BMI | 26.29 | 3.86 |
Mean and Standard deviation of TG, LDL, HDL and BMI according to quartiles of PCBs.
| PCB Congers | Quartiles | Number | Mean (SD) TG | Mean (SD) LDL | Mean (SD) HDL | Mean (SD) BMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCB 138 | Quartile 1 | N = 53 | 111.15 (51.43) | 103.54 (33.20) | 47.98 (9.68) | 25.39 (3.53) |
| Quartile 2 | N = 40 | 128.95 (41.54) | 104.84 (25.18) | 50.66 (10.92) | 26.26 (3.99) | |
| Quartile 3 | N = 45 | 161.24 (88.25) | 109.91 (26.70) | 44.79 (7.36) | 26.31 (4.46) | |
| Quartile 4 | N = 43 | 213.67 (135.78) | 116.10 (29.29) | 45.90 (11.62) | 27.40 (3.23) | |
| PCB 153 | Quartile 1 | N = 45 | 108.16 (47.02) | 104.38 (35.25) | 49.02 (11.09) | 25.69 (3.57) |
| Quartile 2 | N = 48 | 148.15 (79.84) | 106.23 (24.02) | 47.46 (9.71) | 26.06 (3.93) | |
| Quartile 3 | N = 46 | 141.50 (64.16) | 108.50 (28.77) | 46.73 (8.87) | 26.44 (4.61) | |
| Quartile 4 | N = 42 | 214.88 (136.38) | 115.02 (27.75) | 45.40 (10.46) | 27.01 (3.11) | |
| PCB 180 | Quartile 1 | N = 55 | 122.29 (70.04) | 104.71 (33.12) | 46.69 (7.96) | 25.74 (3.45) |
| Quartile 2 | N = 36 | 128.09 (44.97) | 105.46 (26.22) | 52.21 (11.34) | 25.54 (4.15) | |
| Quartile 3 | N = 48 | 166.94 (115.96) | 107.33 (29.64) | 45.33 (10.79) | 26.98 (4.26) | |
| Quartile 4 | N = 42 | 193.86 (108.00) | 116.56 (25.16) | 46.32 (9.87) | 26.85 (3.53) | |
| PCB Sum | Quartile 1 | N = 46 | 108.02 (49.18) | 102.76 (33.93) | 46.88 (8.55) | 25.41 (3.52) |
| Quartile 2 | N = 46 | 147.36 (73.85) | 106.95 (26.22) | 51.55 (11.79) | 26.13 (4.12) | |
| Quartile 3 | N = 47 | 160.36 (115.25) | 108.44 (28.86) | 44.33 (7.63) | 26.69 (4.32) | |
| Quartile 4 | N = 42 | 195.88 (106.25) | 116.05 (26.83) | 46.47 (11.04) | 26.96 (3.26) | |
| PCB 118 | Quartile 1 | N = 135 | 137.08 (76.37) | 108.29 (28.32) | 47.78 (9.84) | 25.80 (3.90) |
| Quartile 2 | N = 15 | 172.14 (60.50) | 114.08 (33.80) | 48.46 (12.45) | 27.34 (3.73) | |
| Quartile 3 | N = 17 | 176.18 (80.71) | 103.06 (31.13) | 43.37 (10.39) | 28.13 (3.58) | |
| Quartile 4 | N = 14 | 246.64 (194.60) | 111.92 (33.92) | 45.23 (9.00) | 27.58 (2.93) | |
Results of multiple linear regression analysis of associations between different quartiles of PCB congeners and various lipid fractions and BMI (n = 181).
| Variable in Model | TG | LD | HD | BMI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCB 138 quartiles | 44.98 | 0.001∗ | 3.21 | 0.50 | -2.01 | 0.17 | 0.64 | 0.27 |
| PCB 153 quartiles | 30.14 | 0.04∗ | 1.98 | 0.71 | -1.27 | 0.43 | -0.41 | 0.53 |
| PCB 180 quartiles | 20.64 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.93 | 0.04 | 0.94 |
| PCB Sum quartiles | 65.82 | 0.006∗ | 1.78 | 0.84 | 3.32 | 0.22 | -0.02 | 0.99 |
| PCB 118 quartiles | 20.10 | 0.005∗ | 2.45 | 0.36 | -1.22 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.053 |
| Model R square | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.25 | 0.13 | ||||
∗Statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05).
TG & LDL adjusted for Age, Gender, BMI, Fat rich diet, Working Type (Active or Sedentary).
HDL adjusted for Age, Gender, BMI, Fat rich diet, Working Type (Active or Sedentary) and Seafood diet.
BMI adjusted for Age, Gender, Fat rich diet, Working Type (Active or Sedentary).