| Literature DB >> 32322698 |
Vasudha Agnihotri1, Priyanka Adhikari2, Neha Pandey3, Priyanka Sati2, Anita Pandey3.
Abstract
Influence of drying temperature (30-50 °C) and relative humidity (RH: 30-80%) on moisture content, energy requirement and quality of Ginkgo biloba leaves with respect to chemical markers namely Ginkgolide A (GA) and Bilobalide (BB), and microbial load of dried materials has been analyzed. Leaves were dried in climate control chamber with varying temperature and relative humidity (RH). Total time required for attaining equilibrium was higher for low temperature at all the RH levels as well as for high RH at all the temperatures. Energy requirement was found to increase at high RH and low temperature. GA and BB concentration increased during drying in comparison to that in fresh material. Microbial load analyzed for dried samples was also found within the limit as prescribed in European Pharmacopeia under the category 3B. 40 °C temperature and 50 % RH with less drying duration was observed as suitable conditions for better recovery of BB and GA content, less microbial load and less energy consumption, during drying of G. biloba leaves.Entities:
Keywords: Active ingredients; Drying; Energy; Food science; Ginkgo biloba L.; Microbial load; Natural product chemistry; Relative humidity; Temperature
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322698 PMCID: PMC7170959 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Climate chamber set up used for drying experiments [36].
Figure 2Effect of relative humidity (%) on moisture removal from G. biloba leaves during drying at A. 30 °C, B. 40 °C, and C. 50 °C.
Effect of drying conditions on concentration of chemical marker compounds (GA and BB) and moisture content variation in G. biloba leaves.
| Drying Conditions | Specific humidity (g/kg) | BB concn (%) | GA concn (%) | MCi (%) | MCe (%) | MCf (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 2.69 ± 0.03 | 75.26 | |||
| 30°C-30% | 0.0008 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 2.38 ± 0.85 | 77.57 | 21.95 | 10 |
| 30°C-40% | 0.0011 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 1.95 ± 0.19 | 73.49 | 20.58 | 16 |
| 30°C-50% | 0.0013 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 2.20 ± 1.48 | 75.62 | 21.53 | 10 |
| 30°C-60% | 0.0016 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 1.64 ± 0.17 | 76.84 | 22.91 | 9 |
| 30°C-70% | 0.0019 | 0.07 ± 0.05 | 2.27 ± 0.23 | 74.87 | 23.51 | 12 |
| 30°C-80% | 0.0021 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 2.41 ± 0.70 | 77.31 | 25.46 | 17 |
| 40°C-30% | 0.0014 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.27 ± 0.80 | 75.64 | 14.47 | 12 |
| 40°C-40% | 0.0019 | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 2.17 ± 0.26 | 76.73 | 20.15 | 12 |
| 40°C-50% | 0.0023 | 71.68 | 18.23 | 20 | ||
| 40°C-60% | 0.0028 | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 72.59 | 18.05 | 18 | |
| 40°C-70% | 0.0033 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 76.59 | 22.72 | 13 | |
| 40°C-80% | 0.0037 | 78.65 | 24.72 | 9 | ||
| 50°C-30% | 0.0023 | 74.03 | 19.82 | 13 | ||
| 50°C-40% | 0.0031 | 2.36 ± 0.83 | 70.44 | 19.07 | 11 | |
| 50°C-50% | 0.0039 | 0.14 ± 0.09 | 2.58 ± 0.75 | 72.43 | 21.39 | 13 |
| 50°C-60% | 0.0047 | 74.01 | 22.38 | 13 | ||
| 50°C-70% | 0.0055 | 68.16 | 22.88 | 11 | ||
| 50°C-80% | 0.0062 | 0.02 ± 0.00 | 0.74 ± 0.41 | 79.11 | 30.40 | 14 |
BB = bilobalide, GA = ginkgolide, MCi = initial moisture content, MCe = equilibrium moisture content, MCf = final moisture content, °C = Temperature. The values in bold are higher than the same in fresh material.
Energy requirement during complete drying of G. biloba leaves at different drying conditions.
| Drying conditions | Et (kWh) | Ekg (kWh/kgfwt) | Ekg(kWh/kgwater) | Ekg(kWh/kgdwt) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30°C-30% | 29.17 ± 0.00 | 972.40 ± 0.00 | 4044.19 ± 6.43E-13 | 10468.47 ± 0 |
| 30°C-40% | 25.58 ± 0.00 | 852.75 ± 0.00 | 3553.14 ± 0 | 9136.63 ± 0 |
| 30°C-50% | 31.42 ± 0.00 | 1047.28 ± 0.00 | 4396.21 ± 0 | 11011.07 ± 0 |
| 30°C-60% | 33.07 ± 1.05 | 1102.17 ± 34.91 | 4692.30 ± 148.63 | 11195.86 ± 354.62 |
| 30°C-70% | 43.24 ± 2.99 | 1441.35 ± 99.75 | 6303.27 ± 436.22 | 13770.84 ± 952.99 |
| 30°C-80% | 61.20 ± 2.11 | 2039.90 ± 70.36 | 9124.8 ± 314.72 | 18582.09 ± 640.91 |
| 40°C-30% | 24.14 ± 1.93 | 804.64 ± 64.37 | 3047.86 ± 243.82 | 11605.31 ± 928.43 |
| 40°C-40% | 32.06 ± 1.84 | 1068.62 ± 61.41 | 4347.90 ± 249.86 | 12205.03 ± 701.38 |
| 40°C-50% | 30.52 ± 0.70 | 1017.18 ± 23.21 | 4283.86 ± 97.75 | 10607.88 ± 242.07 |
| 40°C-60% | 35.93 ± 2.03 | 1197.51 ± 67.83 | 5005.84 ± 283.55 | 12724.41 ± 720.75 |
| 40°C-70% | 52.15 ± 1.77 | 1738.42 ± 59.01 | 7415.06 ± 251.70 | 17579.53 ± 596.73 |
| 40°C-80% | 61.23 ± 0.19 | 2041.15 ± 6.44 | 8930.67 ± 28.17 | 19480.79 ± 61.46 |
| 50°C-30% | 21.29 ± 0.47 | 709.64 ± 15.60 | 2907.05 ± 63.89 | 7953.67 ± 174.81 |
| 50°C-40% | 21.29 ± 1.53 | 709.71 ± 51.14 | 2919.30 ± 210.36 | 7866.29 ± 566.84 |
| 50°C-50% | 36.97 ± 2.76 | 1232.37 ± 91.96 | 5246.62 ± 391.49 | 12518.45 ± 934.11 |
| 50°C-60% | 49.38 ± 3.04 | 1645.92 ± 101.41 | 7077.55 ± 436.05 | 16332.22 ± 1006.25 |
| 50°C-70% | 50.79 ± 0.62 | 1692.90 ± 20.64 | 7644.78 ± 93.20 | 15130.14 ± 184.47 |
| 50°C-80% | 54.77 ± 3.91 | 1825.70 ± 130.32 | 8896.20 ± 635.02 | 14250.89 ± 1017.25 |
Et = total energy (kWh), Ekg (kWh/kgfwt) = specific energy per kg fresh wt of sample, Ekg (kWh/kgdwt) = specific energy per kg dry wt of sample, Ekg (kWh/kgwater) = specific energy per kg water removed from the sample, °C = Temperature.
Figure 3Effect of relative humidity (%) and temperature (°C) on specific energy consumption (kWh/kgfwt) during drying.
Figure 4GC chromatograms of G. biloba dried leaves under different combinations of temperature (°C) and relative humidity (%) showing concentration of Ginkgolide A (Rt = 16.8 min) and Bilobalide (Rt = 13.1 min) (Rt= Retention time): A.40°C-30%; B. 40°C-40%; C. 40°C-50%; D. 40°C-60%; E. 40°C-70%; F. 40°C-80%.
Figure 5Variation of Ginkgolide A with varying A. relative humidity (%), and B. temperature (°C); variation of Bilobalide with varying C. relative humidity (%), and D. temperature (°C).
Microbial load on fresh and dried leaf samples of G. biloba.
| Category under European pharmacopeia | Type of microbes | Colony forming units (cfu/g) ±SE | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresh sample | Dry sample | |||||
| 30°C-30% | 40°C-50% | 50°C-60% | ||||
| 102 | 3 B (Aerobic bacteria: 104) | Aerobic bacteria | 48.33 ± 2.8 | 26.66 ± 2.5 | 8.33 ± 2.0 | 2.33 ± 0.5 |
| Molds | 9.66 ± 2.3 | 7.33 ± 1.15 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 0.66 ± 0.5 | ||
| 103 | Aerobic bacteria | 46.66 ± 7.6 | 17.66 ± 1.5 | 3.66 ± 1.5 | - | |
| Molds | 8.66 ± 1.5 | 5.0 ± 1.0 | 0.33 ± 0.5 | - | ||
| 104 | Aerobic bacteria | 32.3 ± 4.04 | 11.66 ± 3.5 | - | - | |
| Molds | 2.66 ± 2.0 | 3.33 ± 1.5 | - | - | ||
| 105 | Aerobic bacteria | 22 ± 2.0 | 9.0 ± 1.0 | - | - | |
| Molds | 1.33 ± 0.5 | - | - | - | ||
| 106 | Aerobic bacteria | 10.66 ± 1.5 | 2.66 ± 2.0 | - | - | |
| Molds | 0.66 ± 0.5 | - | - | - | ||
| 107 | Aerobic bacteria | 6.55 ± 1.5 | - | - | - | |
| Molds | - | - | - | - | ||
| 108 | Aerobic bacteria | 2.66 ± 1.15 | - | - | - | |
| Molds | - | - | - | - | ||
| 109 | Aerobic bacteria | 1.0 ± 1.0 | - | - | - | |
| Molds | - | - | - | - | ||
SE = Standard Error (among the replicates), - = No growth.