H Jonathon Rendina1,2, Demetria N Cain1, Jonathan López-Matos1,2, Marielle Ray1, Sitaji Gurung1,3, Jeffrey T Parsons4. 1. Department of Psychology, Hunter College, The City University of New York, New York, New York. 2. Health Psychology and Clinical Science Doctoral Program, The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, New York. 3. Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, The City University of New York, New York, New York. 4. Private Consultant, Teaneck, New Jersey.
Abstract
Purpose: Transgender women (TGW) experience high rates of stigma based on their gender identity. Research has documented how transgender stigma and other discrimination negatively contribute to health inequities, including higher rates of depression compared with the general population. However, few scales measuring transgender stigma exist, even fewer that specifically assess anticipated or internalized transgender stigma. We sought to validate an adapted transgender stigma scale in a diverse sample of TGW. Methods: We adapted an existing stigma measure to capture experiences of anticipated and internalized transgender stigma for TGW. Adapted measures were completed by 213 diverse TGW. Factor analysis was completed to reduce the number of items in each scale and sociodemographic differences in each construct were explored. Results: The final nine items comprising anticipated transgender stigma and the five items for internalized transgender stigma both showed evidence of adequate model fit, unidimensionality, and internal consistency. The two constructs were moderately correlated with one another (r=0.36, p<0.001). We identified educational and HIV status differences in anticipated transgender stigma but no sociodemographic differences in internalized transgender stigma. Conclusion: We developed brief measures of internalized and anticipated transgender stigma through initial adaptation by TGW themselves and subsequent psychometric evaluation, demonstrating evidence of unidimensionality and internal consistency. These subscales were only moderately associated with one another and may provide unique insights in future research on minority stress among TGW. Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Purpose: Transgender women (TGW) experience high rates of stigma based on their gender identity. Research has documented how transgender stigma and other discrimination negatively contribute to health inequities, including higher rates of depression compared with the general population. However, few scales measuring transgender stigma exist, even fewer that specifically assess anticipated or internalized transgender stigma. We sought to validate an adapted transgender stigma scale in a diverse sample of TGW. Methods: We adapted an existing stigma measure to capture experiences of anticipated and internalized transgender stigma for TGW. Adapted measures were completed by 213 diverse TGW. Factor analysis was completed to reduce the number of items in each scale and sociodemographic differences in each construct were explored. Results: The final nine items comprising anticipated transgender stigma and the five items for internalized transgender stigma both showed evidence of adequate model fit, unidimensionality, and internal consistency. The two constructs were moderately correlated with one another (r=0.36, p<0.001). We identified educational and HIV status differences in anticipated transgender stigma but no sociodemographic differences in internalized transgender stigma. Conclusion: We developed brief measures of internalized and anticipated transgender stigma through initial adaptation by TGW themselves and subsequent psychometric evaluation, demonstrating evidence of unidimensionality and internal consistency. These subscales were only moderately associated with one another and may provide unique insights in future research on minority stress among TGW. Copyright 2020, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers.
Authors: Ramiro Figueiredo Catelan; Alexandre Saadeh; Maria Inês Rodrigues Lobato; Daniel Augusto Mori Gagliotti; Angelo Brandelli Costa Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 3.390