Literature DB >> 32322641

Data for understanding the risk perception of COVID-19 from Vietnamese sample.

Toan Luu Duc Huynh1.   

Abstract

This data article describes the risk perception of COVID-190 from 391 Vietnamese respondents aged from 15 to 47 years. These data have been used in Huynh (2020). These data include the socioeconomics, media attention, and risk perception of COVID-19 in Vietnam through a survey conducted on February 1, 2020. In addition, our data might serve as a reference source for further in-depth surveys to understand the risk perception and social media communication across countries.
© 2020 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19 pandemic; Media attention; Risk perception; Socioeconomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32322641      PMCID: PMC7171448          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table

Value of the data

Our data are important because this is the first data collection at the primary level to understand the risk perception in the world regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Researchers, educators, policymakers, and all institutions involved in public health can benefit from our data because by using these data, they can understand the risk perception in Vietnam for the COVID-19 epidemic. These data can be reused for further insights and development of experiments by comparing the cross-country findings or contributing to meta-analysis in the future. These data can be applied in short term and long term because the COVID-19 pandemic is a global emergency. These data are collected carefully from the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in February 2020. Thus, it is timely data collection, which is considered as the additional value of our data.

Data description

Since COVID-19 was declared as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by World Health Organization (WHO), many research projects are being conducted to understand the different perspectives of this deadly virus. Therefore, this dataset offers an insightful information based on survey data on how Vietnamese citizens perceived the risks of coronavirus spread in the beginning period of outbreaks, particularly on February 1, 2020. In total, 391 Vietnamese people aged 15–47 years were surveyed for COVID-19-related risk perceptions. The platform for data collection is an Internet research tool provided by the University of Economics, Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam). The total time duration for survey was 20 days, and the survey was conducted in Vietnamese. Table 1 demonstrates the data characteristics for continuous variables that the questionnaire asked the respondents. The questionnaire used a 10-point Likert scale from 1 to 10 based on Dawes [1]. Table 2 represents the data summary of variables with intervals for answering.
Table 1

Data summary of continuous variables.

VariableObs.MeanStd. Dev.MinMax
AGE (year)37124.486.071547
INCOME (million Vietnamdong)31310.9310.290.450
FAMILYMEMBER (members)3794.421.87010
FREQUENCY (times)3734.986.34024
RISKPERCEPTION (level)3867.651.80110
FAKENEWS (level)3857.891.91110
OFFICIALNEWS (level)3865.871.90110

Notes: The respondents could skip uncomfortable questions. Therefore, the number of observation varies for each question.

Table 2

Data summary of variables with interval answers.

VariablesIntervals
GENDERMale (46.80%)Female (43.73%)Others (9.47%)
RELIGIONNon-religion (62.66%)Buddhism (29.67%)Christian and Protestant (4.35%)Others (3.32%)
CAREERStudent (46.80%)State officer (13.81%)Private officer (39.39%)
PROVINCENorth (20.70%)Central (15.32%)South (63.98%)
EDUCATIONHigh school (10.91%)University (69.35%)Post-graduation (19.74%)
SOCIALMEDIALess 1 h (4.65%)From 1 to 3 h (46.77%)More than 3 h (48.58%)
nCOV-SOURCEOfficial information (24.55%)Social media and word-of-mouth (62.40%)Others (13.04%)
Data summary of continuous variables. Notes: The respondents could skip uncomfortable questions. Therefore, the number of observation varies for each question. Data summary of variables with interval answers. In total, the questionnaire used in the 2020 survey included 14 questions. On average, it took approximately 10-15 minutes to complete this survey. The data covered COVID-19 risk perception, socioeconomics, and media attention. Our discussion of theoretical backgrounds and development in the further analysis of the survey variables can be found in the associated research article [2] (Table 3).
Table 3

Codebook and the related question.

CodebookQuestions
AGEHow old are you?
GENDERWhich gender do you identify with?
RELIGIONWhich religion are you belonging to?
INCOMEWhat is your monthly household income?
CAREERWhat is your current career?
FAMILYMEMBERHow many people are you living with in your household?
SOCIALMEDIAHow frequently do you use social media applications? (Facebook/Instagram, etc.)
PROVINCEIn which part have you mostly lived?
EDUCATIONWhat is your current educational background?
nCoV-SOURCEIn which source are you looking for information about COVID-19?
FREQUENCYHow many times do you actively look for COVID-19 information per an hour?
RISKPERCEPTIONFrom 1 to 10, to what extent do you concern/worry about COVID-19?
FAKENEWSFrom 1 to 10, to what extent do you think that the number of fake news (not confirmed or verified by any official organizations such as WHO, Ministry of Health and so forth) is overwhelming?
OFFICIALNEWSFrom 1 to 10, to what extent do you think that the number of official news (confirmed or verified by any official organizations such as WHO, Ministry of Health and so forth) is overwhelming?
Codebook and the related question.

Experimental design, materials, and methods

The questionnaire consists of three parts. The first part includes basic information of respondents. The second part has several questions regarding the use of social media use. The last part includes detailed information about participants’ risk perception of COVID-19 outbreaks in Vietnam. Our research design is mainly based on the theoretical framework [3]. Social and mass media could influence the risk perception [4] because the information might refer to heuristics. Thus, our questionnaire includes social media use behavior, which might contribute to the perceived risk in each sample. The personal characteristics are the potential sources that have an impact on risk perception [5]. These studies are our referred sources to design the questionnaire regarding the COVID-19 risk perception. As mentioned earlier, the 10-point Likert scale was used to estimate the risk perception from 1 “totally disagree” and 10 “totally agree”. In addition, apart from risk perception, the respondents were asked to consider the level of fake news as well as the overwhelming news of governmental office about COVID-19 in the 10-point Likert scale. In fact, these questions focus on the respondents’ perception of the number of (fake/official) news. Therefore, we asked the participant the level of overwhelming information on the online platform that they used to search for COVID-19 information. Survey data were collected through an anonymous self-administered questionnaire on the Internet platform. We randomly distributed the questionnaires to three regions in Vietnam (North, Central and South). Our data are the primary and first survey conducted about COVID-19 in Vietnam, a developing country. The analysis of our data could be done by STATA and other software to visualize and use for further econometric models. Therefore, follow-up studies might extend our work and enable to determine some helpful features to succeed in the containment of COVID-19.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The author declares that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.
SubjectInfectious Diseases
Specific subject areaEconometric models applied to infectious diseases’ epidemiological data to understand the risk perception through socioeconomics and media attention.
Type of dataTable
How data were acquiredSurvey
Data formatData are in raw format and have been analyzed. An Excel file with data has been uploaded.
Parameters for data collectionThere is no parameter used for data collection. It is randomized.
Description of data collectionData were collected from a random sample of an Internet research source, which provided an electronic questionnaire. Data have been collected since February 1, 2020, when the Vietnamese Prime minister officially declared the global and national emergency scenario.
Data source locationRegion: AsiaCountry: Vietnam
Data accessibilityhttps://data.mendeley.com/datasets/wh9xk5mp9m/3
Related research articleHuynh, T. L. (2020). The COVID-19 risk perception: A survey on socioeconomics and media attention. Economics Bulletin, 40(1), 758-764.
  3 in total

1.  Personality correlates of risk perception.

Authors:  M Bouyer; S Bagdassarian; S Chaabanne; E Mullet
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: the example of vaccination.

Authors:  Noel T Brewer; Gretchen B Chapman; Frederick X Gibbons; Meg Gerrard; Kevin D McCaul; Neil D Weinstein
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  What risks are Chinese people concerned about?

Authors:  Xiaofei Xie; Mei Wang; Liancang Xu
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.000

  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  Level of Perceived Attitude and Practice and Associated Factors Towards the Prevention of the COVID-19 Epidemic Among Residents of Dessie and Kombolcha Town Administrations: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Ayesheshim Muluneh Kassa; Getahun Gebre Bogale; Asnakew Molla Mekonen
Journal:  Res Rep Trop Med       Date:  2020-11-19

2.  Perceived risk and protective behaviors regarding COVID-19 among Iranian pregnant women.

Authors:  Soodabeh Aghababaei; Saeed Bashirian; Alireza Soltanian; Mansoureh Refaei; Tahereh Omidi; Samereh Ghelichkhani; Farzaneh Soltani
Journal:  Middle East Fertil Soc J       Date:  2020-09-18

3.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards COVID-19 Pandemic Among Quarantined Adults in Tigrai Region, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mekonnen Haftom; Pammla Petrucka; Kbrom Gemechu; Haftamu Mamo; Tesfay Tsegay; Embay Amare; Hayelom Kahsay; Alem Gebremariam
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Risk Perception Towards COVID-19 and Its Associated Factors Among Waiters in Selected Towns of Southwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Adane Asefa; Qaro Qanche; Shewangizaw Hailemariam; Tadesse Dhuguma; Tadesse Nigussie
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-11-13

5.  Risk Perception of International Medical Students About Coronavirus (COVID-19) in China and Their Willingness to Fly Back.

Authors:  Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad; Muhammad Akram Naseem; Ramiz Ur Rehman; Weiqing Zhuang; Rizwan Ali; Muhammad Suhaib Manzoor
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Comparing Public Perceptions and Preventive Behaviors During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom: Cross-sectional Survey Study.

Authors:  Leigh Bowman; Kin On Kwok; Rozlyn Redd; Yuanyuan Yi; Helen Ward; Wan In Wei; Christina Atchison; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Knowledge, Practice, and Attitude Toward COVID-19 Among Physicians in Jordan and Palestine: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Saddam Al Demour; Mera A Ababneh; Raed N Al-Taher; Adel F Alrabadi; Ahmad F Jaradat; Faris A Abushamma; Fadi A Al-Hadidi; Baeth M Al-Rawashdeh; Mohammad A Ihmeidan; Ahmad K Abubaker; Mohammad T Al-Zubi
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-01-13

8.  How do we share data in COVID-19 research? A systematic review of COVID-19 datasets in PubMed Central Articles.

Authors:  Xu Zuo; Yong Chen; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Hua Xu
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Attachment, Personality and Locus of Control: Psychological Determinants of Risk Perception and Preventive Behaviors for COVID-19.

Authors:  Sofia Tagini; Agostino Brugnera; Roberta Ferrucci; Ketti Mazzocco; Luca Pievani; Alberto Priori; Nicola Ticozzi; Angelo Compare; Vincenzo Silani; Gabriella Pravettoni; Barbara Poletti
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Misinformation on COVID-19 origin and its relationship with perception and knowledge about social distancing: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lenisse M Reyes; Lilibeth Ortiz; Maxwell Abedi; Yenifel Luciano; Wilma Ramos; Pablo J de Js Reyes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.