| Literature DB >> 32322424 |
Li Jiang1, Yun Wu1, Yan Wang1, Qin Zhou1, Yuguo Zheng1, Yafei Chen1, Qianchun Zhang1.
Abstract
A highly sensitive and selective sensor for isobutyraldehyde (IBD) is demonstrated based on intensive cataluminescence (CTL) emission from the surface of nanosized Sm2O3 particles. The characteristics and optimum conditions for the CTL sensor, including the working temperature, wavelength, and flow rate, were investigated in detail. Under the optimized experimental conditions, the CTL intensity varied linearly with the concentration of IBD, in the two-order-of-magnitude range of 0.015-3.9 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.99991 and a limit of detection (LOD), at a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N = 3) of 4.6 ng/mL. The sensor was quite specific: butyraldehyde, methanol, ethanol, acetone, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, benzene, ethylbenzene, and cumene could not produce significant CTL intensities; specifically, butyraldehyde, ethanol, acetone, and acetaldehyde produced low CTL intensities, with values that were 3.8%, 2.8%, 0.60%, and 0.57% that of IBD. As a test of sensor stability, we found that the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 30 measurements of the CTL at an IBD concentration of 1.6 μg/mL within a period of 72 h was 2.2%, indicating good stability and long service life of the sensor. The sensor was tested against spiked samples containing IBD, and recoveries between 89.7% and 97.4% were obtained with an RSD of 6.1%-8.6%. The performance of the sensor indicated its utility for practical sample analysis.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322424 PMCID: PMC7152939 DOI: 10.1155/2020/5205724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the CTL sensing system device.
Figure 2(a) SEM images of nano-Sm2O3; (b) TEM images of nano-Sm2O3; (c) SAED of nano-Sm2O3.
Figure 3(a) FT-IR spectrum of nano-Sm2O3; (b) XRD pattern of nano-Sm2O3.
Figure 4(a) CTL response to IBD by different materials; (b) CTL response to different VOCs by nano-Sm2O3; (c) CTL response curves versus time for different concentrations of IBD on nano-Sm2O3.
Figure 5Effect of detection conditions on CTL intensity, noise, and S/N. (a) Effect of working temperature on CTL intensity, noise, and S/N; (b) effect of wavelength on CTL intensity and S/N; (c) effect of air flow rate on CTL intensity.
Figure 6(a) Calibration curve between CTL intensity and concentration of IBD; (b) typical results obtained from ten replicate determinations of IBD within 150 s.
Analysis results of IBD samples measured by the proposed CTL sensor.
| Sample no. | Composition | Spiked values ( | Measured values ( | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IBD | 0.0310 | 0.0278 | 89.7 | 6.1 |
| Formaldehyde | 0.0310 | ||||
| Ammonia | 0.0310 | ||||
| 2 | IBD | 0.310 | 0.285 | 91.9 | 8.5 |
| Acetaldehyde | 0.310 | ||||
| Ethanol | 0.310 | ||||
| 3 | IBD | 3.10 | 3.02 | 97.4 | 8.6 |
| Acetone | 3.10 | ||||
| Benzene | 3.10 |