| Literature DB >> 32322394 |
Bezawit Adane1, Girmatsion Fisseha2, Getaw Walle1, Melaku Yalew3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most postpartum women and newborns do not utilize postnatal care due to less emphasis given especially in developing countries. Understanding individual and community-level factors associated with postnatal care will help to design appropriate strategies and policies for improving service utilization. Therefore, this study aimed to assess individual and community-level factors associated with postnatal care utilization in Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; Factor associated; Multi-level analysis; Postnatal care utilization
Year: 2020 PMID: 32322394 PMCID: PMC7161122 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-020-00415-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Public Health ISSN: 0778-7367
Fig. 1--+Sampling and exclusion procedures to identify the final sample size in 2016 EDHS
Fig. 2The area under the ROC curve for each model (null model, model 1, model 2 and mode 3) in 2016 EDHS
Socio-demographic characteristics of women in Ethiopia who gave birth within 2 years before the survey, EDHS 2016 (n = 4489)
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 15–19 | 287 | 6.39 |
| 20–34 | 3297 | 73.46 | |
| 35–49 | 904 | 20.14 | |
| Marital status | Never in union | 32 | 0.70 |
| Formerly married | 188 | 4.18 | |
| Currently married | 4269 | 95.12 | |
| Age at first marriage | < 16 years | 1708 | 38.05 |
| 16–19 years | 1769 | 39.40 | |
| > 19 years | 1013 | 22.55 | |
| Educational status | No education | 2736 | 60.95 |
| Primary | 1355 | 30.18 | |
| Secondary | 268 | 5.98 | |
| Higher | 130 | 2.89 | |
| Occupation | Not employed | 2843 | 63.34 |
| Employed | 1646 | 36.66 | |
| Husband Education | No education | 1924 | 45.35 |
| Primary | 1710 | 40.29 | |
| Secondary | 393 | 9.27 | |
| Higher | 216 | 5.09 | |
| Husband occupation | Not Employed | 484 | 11.40 |
| Employed | 3761 | 88.60 |
Obstetric and related characteristics of women in Ethiopia who gave birth within 2 years before the survey, EDHS 2016 (n = 4489)
| Variables | Category | Frequency | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birth order | 1 | 912 | 20.31 |
| 2–4 | 1889 | 42.08 | |
| ≥5 | 1688 | 37.61 | |
| Place of delivery | Home | 2887 | 64.31 |
| Health facility | 1602 | 35.69 | |
| The last child wanted | No | 1172 | 26.10 |
| Yes | 3317 | 73.90 | |
| No of ANC visit | 0 | 1595 | 35.54 |
| 1–3 | 1399 | 31.16 | |
| ≥4 | 1495 | 33.30 | |
| Mode of delivery | Cesarean section | 4369 | 97.34 |
| Vaginal | 119 | 2.66 | |
| Women autonomy | Low | 489 | 11.47 |
| High | 3779 | 88.53 | |
| Attitude towards wife-beating | Opposing | 2485 | 55.51 |
| Favorable | 1991 | 44.49 |
Multilevel logistic regression analysis of individual and community-level factors associated with PNC in Ethiopia, EDHS 2016
| Individual and community level characteristics | COR (95% CI) | Model 0 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No education | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Primary | 1.19 (0.63, 2.25) | 0.98 (0.47, 2.07) | 0.86 (0.40, 1.86) | ||
| Secondary | 1.95 (0.76, 4.97) | 1.15 (0.41, 3.23) | 0.94 (0.35, 2.51) | ||
| Higher | 3.97 (1.09,14.35) | 2.92 (0.78,11.01) | 1.98 (0.54,7.31) | ||
| Not employed | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Employed | 1.66 (0.91, 3.03) | 1.43 (0.77, 2.66) | 1.26 (.62, 2.55) | ||
| Home | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Health facility | 2.25 (1.18, 4.27) | 1.19 (0.58,2.45) | 1.01 (0.48, 2.12 | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| 1–3 | 7.27 (2.29, 22.97) | 8.3 (2.12, 32.35) | 7.27 (1.8,29.27)* | ||
| > =4 | 12.0 (3.84,37.51) | 12.24 (3.1, 8.24) | 10.8 (2.65,43.7)* | ||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| High | 2.64 (.87, 7.96) | 2.02 (0.58,6.7) | 2.09 (0.65, 6.74) | ||
| No exposure | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Low exposure | 2.42 (1.23, 4.76) | 1.43 (0.70, 2.91) | 1.27 (0.62,2.60) | ||
| High exposure | 1.11 (.56, 2.20) | 0.4 (0.19,1.18) | 0.47 (0.18, 1.23) | ||
| Poorest | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Poorer | 1.19 (0.39,3.56) | 0.97 (0.32, 2.9) | 0.96 (0.32,2.84) | ||
| Middle | 4.08 (1.58,10.52) | 2.87 (1.08, 7.7) | 3.10 (1.12,8.57)* | ||
| Richer | 3.43 (1.25, 9.44) | 2.18 (0.76, 6.3) | 2.18 (0.69,6.81) | ||
| Richest | 4.89 (1.77,13.54) | 2.73 (0.8, 9.29) | 1.99 (0.44,9.09) | ||
| No education | 0.28 (0.11, 0.77) | 0.97 (0.28, 3.30) | 1.02 (0.29,3.61) | ||
| Primary | 0.35 (0.13, 0 .92) | 0.91 (.28, 2.93) | 0.97 (0.28,3.26) | ||
| Secondary | 0.09 (0.03, 0.34) | 0.17 (0.04, 0.68) | 0.17 (0.04,0.68)* | ||
| Higher | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Urban | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Rural | 0.34 (0.19,0 .58) | 0.91 (0.40,2.05) | 0.82 (0.25, 2.64) | ||
| Far | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Near | 2.57 (1.39, 4.74) | 2.03 (1.05,3.92) | 1.92 (0.97, 3.78) | ||
| 1.02 (1.01,1.03) | 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 1.01 0(.99, 1.02) | |||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Middle | 0.62 (0.31, 1.17) | 1.32 (0.60,2.82) | 1.54 (0.68, 3.44) | ||
| High | 0.31 (0.16,0.60) | 0.92 (0.38,2.16) | 1.59 (0.60, 4.23) | ||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Middle | 1.64 (0.68,3.88) | 1.32 (0.58,3.01) | 1.02 (0.44, 2.34) | ||
| High | 4.29 (2.05, 8.97) | 2.56 (1.14,5.73) | 2.53 (1.06, 6.06)* | ||
| 1.01 (1.00,1.02) | 1.0 (0.99,1.01) | 1.00 (0.98, 1.01) | |||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |||
| High | 3.75 (1.93,7.26) | 2.25 (1.16, 4.4 | 2.32 (1.14, 4.73)* | ||
Key: * = P-value
< 0.05, ** = P-value < 0.01, AOR = Adjusted odds ratio and© = Continuous Variable, HSU = Health service utilization 1 = Reference
Result from a random intercept model (a measure of variation) for PNC at cluster level by multilevel logistic regression analysis, EDHS 2016
| Measure of variation | Model 0 (Null model) (95% CI) | Model 1 (95% CI) | Model 2 (95% CI) | Model3 (Full model) (95%CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variance | 2.37 | 1.77 | 1.52 | 1.50 |
| Explained variation (PCV) (%) | Ref. | 25 | 35 | 37 |
| ICC (%) | 42 (30.00, 53.99) | 35 (24.62, 45.37) | 32 (22.33, 41.66) | 31 (21.39, 40.61) |
| MOR | 3.97 (3.85, 4.09) | 3.42 (3.31, 3.2) | 3.18 (3.08, 3.27) | 3.15 (3.05, 3.24) |
| Model fitness | ||||
| Log-likelihood | − 552.68 | − 466.41 | − 525.29 | − 451.52 |
Model 0 = without independent variables (null model), Model 1 = only individual-level variables, Model 2 = only community-level variables, Model 3 = both individual and community-level variables, PCV Proportional change in variance, ICC Intra-class correlation coefficient and MOR Median odds ratio