Tomoyuki Kamao1, Naomi Takahashi2, Xiaodong Zheng1, Atsushi Shiraishi1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine , Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Saiseikai Matsuyama Hospital , Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the quality of life (QOL) and quality of vision (QOV) of patients who developed and did not develop dry eye disease (DED) after nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective nonrandomized observational study of 91 patients diagnosed with unilateral NLDO. The subjects underwent lacrimal stent insertion, and the stent was removed after 10-12 weeks. The QOL and QOV of the patients were examined preoperatively and at 6 months after the stent was removed. The postoperative outcomes were assessed subjectively with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire and an ocular specific questionnaire of 6 symptoms. The best-corrected visual acuity, functional visual acuity, and dry eye scores were also determined. Results: Of the 91 eyes, 19 eyes (20.9%) were diagnosed with DED (D group) and 72 were not (N group). Five of the 6 symptoms improved in the N group, while only 3 symptoms improved in the D group without blurred vision. For the GBI questionnaire, the social support and physical health scores were significantly higher in the N group than in the D group. The functional visual acuity improved significantly in the N group but not significantly in the D group. Conclusions: Patients who develop DED after treatments for NLDO may not have an improvement of their QOL or QOV. Therefore, careful dry eye assessments are important before treatments for NLDO.
Purpose: To determine the quality of life (QOL) and quality of vision (QOV) of patients who developed and did not develop dry eye disease (DED) after nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) treatment. Methods: This was a retrospective nonrandomized observational study of 91 patients diagnosed with unilateral NLDO. The subjects underwent lacrimal stent insertion, and the stent was removed after 10-12 weeks. The QOL and QOV of the patients were examined preoperatively and at 6 months after the stent was removed. The postoperative outcomes were assessed subjectively with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) questionnaire and an ocular specific questionnaire of 6 symptoms. The best-corrected visual acuity, functional visual acuity, and dry eye scores were also determined. Results: Of the 91 eyes, 19 eyes (20.9%) were diagnosed with DED (D group) and 72 were not (N group). Five of the 6 symptoms improved in the N group, while only 3 symptoms improved in the D group without blurred vision. For the GBI questionnaire, the social support and physical health scores were significantly higher in the N group than in the D group. The functional visual acuity improved significantly in the N group but not significantly in the D group. Conclusions: Patients who develop DED after treatments for NLDO may not have an improvement of their QOL or QOV. Therefore, careful dry eye assessments are important before treatments for NLDO.
Entities:
Keywords:
Lacrimal passage obstruction; bicanalicular intubation; dry eye; quality of life; quality of vision