Literature DB >> 32320842

Determining the effectiveness of early intensive versus escalation approaches for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: The DELIVER-MS study protocol.

Daniel Ontaneda1, Emma C Tallantyre2, Praneeta C Raza3, Sarah M Planchon3, Kunio Nakamura4, Deborah Miller3, Carrie Hersh5, Mathew Craner6, Clare Bale7, Burhan Chaudhry8, Douglas D Gunzler9, Thomas E Love9, Stephen Gerry10, Alasdair Coles11, Jeffrey A Cohen3, Nikos Evangelou12.   

Abstract

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a common cause of neurological disability among young adults and has a high economic burden. Currently there are 18 disease modifying agents for relapsing MS, which were tested in clinical trials versus placebo or an active comparator in a pairwise manner. However, there is currently no consensus on the fundamental principles of treatment approach and initial therapy selection. These factors result in variable use of disease modifying therapies. Here we describe the study protocol for Determining the Effectiveness of earLy Intensive Versus Escalation approaches for the Treatment of Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (DELIVER-MS). The main objective of the study is to determine whether an early highly effective treatment approach, defined as use of one of four monoclonal antibodies as initial therapy, is more effective than an escalation treatment approach (any other approved medication as initial therapy with subsequent escalation to higher efficacy treatments guided by radiological and clinical evaluation). The primary endpoint of the study is reduction in normalized brain volume loss from baseline visit to month 36 visit using MRI. Brain volume loss was selected as the best short-term predictor of long-term clinical disability. A total of 400 participants will be randomized 1:1 using minimization to account for age and sex by site, and 400 will be enrolled into a parallel observational cohort. The study results will help guide overall treatment philosophy and will have important implications for patient choice, clinical practice, and treatment access.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Disease modifying therapy; Early highly effective treatment; Escalation approach; Multiple sclerosis; Relapsing remitting

Year:  2020        PMID: 32320842     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  4 in total

Review 1.  The need for a strategic therapeutic approach: multiple sclerosis in check.

Authors:  Hernan Inojosa; Undine Proschmann; Katja Akgün; Tjalf Ziemssen
Journal:  Ther Adv Chronic Dis       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Early use of high-efficacy disease‑modifying therapies makes the difference in people with multiple sclerosis: an expert opinion.

Authors:  Massimo Filippi; Maria Pia Amato; Diego Centonze; Paolo Gallo; Claudio Gasperini; Matilde Inglese; Francesco Patti; Carlo Pozzilli; Paolo Preziosa; Maria Trojano
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 6.682

3.  Health Economic Impact of Software-Assisted Brain MRI on Therapeutic Decision-Making and Outcomes of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Patients-A Microsimulation Study.

Authors:  Diana M Sima; Giovanni Esposito; Wim Van Hecke; Annemie Ribbens; Guy Nagels; Dirk Smeets
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-11-27

4.  Initial treatment strategy and clinical outcomes in Finnish MS patients: a propensity-matched study.

Authors:  K Hänninen; M Viitala; S Atula; S M Laakso; H Kuusisto; M Soilu-Hänninen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 4.849

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.